Cargando…

Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Ophthalmic disorders cause 8% of hospital clinic attendances, the highest of any specialty. The fundamental need for a distance visual acuity (VA) measurement constrains remote consultation. A web-application, DigiVis, facilitates self-assessment of VA using two internet-conne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thirunavukarasu, Arun James, Mullinger, Deborah, Rufus-Toye, Remi Mohan, Farrell, Sarah, Allen, Louise E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34462579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01760-2
_version_ 1783746066554814464
author Thirunavukarasu, Arun James
Mullinger, Deborah
Rufus-Toye, Remi Mohan
Farrell, Sarah
Allen, Louise E.
author_facet Thirunavukarasu, Arun James
Mullinger, Deborah
Rufus-Toye, Remi Mohan
Farrell, Sarah
Allen, Louise E.
author_sort Thirunavukarasu, Arun James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Ophthalmic disorders cause 8% of hospital clinic attendances, the highest of any specialty. The fundamental need for a distance visual acuity (VA) measurement constrains remote consultation. A web-application, DigiVis, facilitates self-assessment of VA using two internet-connected devices. This prospective validation study aimed to establish its accuracy, reliability, usability and acceptability. SUBJECTS/METHODS: In total, 120 patients aged 5–87 years (median = 27) self-tested their vision twice using DigiVis in addition to their standard clinical assessment. Eyes with VA worse than +0.80 logMAR were excluded. Accuracy and test-retest (TRT) variability were compared using Bland–Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Patient feedback was analysed. RESULTS: Bias between VA tests was insignificant at −0.001 (95% CI −0.017 to 0.015) logMAR. The upper limit of agreement (LOA) was 0.173 (95% CI 0.146 to 0.201) and the lower LOA −0.175 (95% CI −0.202 to −0.147) logMAR. The ICC was 0.818 (95% CI 0.748 to 0.869). DigiVis TRT mean bias was similarly insignificant, at 0.001 (95% CI −0.011 to 0.013) logMAR, the upper LOA was 0.124 (95% CI 0.103 to 0.144) and the lower LOA −0.121 (95% CI −0.142 to −0.101) logMAR. The ICC was 0.922 (95% CI 0.887 to 0.946). 95% of subjects were willing to use DigiVis to monitor vision at home. CONCLUSIONS: Self-tested distance VA using DigiVis is accurate, reliable and well accepted by patients. The app has potential to facilitate home monitoring, triage and remote consultation but widescale implementation will require integration with NHS databases and secure patient data storage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8403827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84038272021-08-30 Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity Thirunavukarasu, Arun James Mullinger, Deborah Rufus-Toye, Remi Mohan Farrell, Sarah Allen, Louise E. Eye (Lond) Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Ophthalmic disorders cause 8% of hospital clinic attendances, the highest of any specialty. The fundamental need for a distance visual acuity (VA) measurement constrains remote consultation. A web-application, DigiVis, facilitates self-assessment of VA using two internet-connected devices. This prospective validation study aimed to establish its accuracy, reliability, usability and acceptability. SUBJECTS/METHODS: In total, 120 patients aged 5–87 years (median = 27) self-tested their vision twice using DigiVis in addition to their standard clinical assessment. Eyes with VA worse than +0.80 logMAR were excluded. Accuracy and test-retest (TRT) variability were compared using Bland–Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Patient feedback was analysed. RESULTS: Bias between VA tests was insignificant at −0.001 (95% CI −0.017 to 0.015) logMAR. The upper limit of agreement (LOA) was 0.173 (95% CI 0.146 to 0.201) and the lower LOA −0.175 (95% CI −0.202 to −0.147) logMAR. The ICC was 0.818 (95% CI 0.748 to 0.869). DigiVis TRT mean bias was similarly insignificant, at 0.001 (95% CI −0.011 to 0.013) logMAR, the upper LOA was 0.124 (95% CI 0.103 to 0.144) and the lower LOA −0.121 (95% CI −0.142 to −0.101) logMAR. The ICC was 0.922 (95% CI 0.887 to 0.946). 95% of subjects were willing to use DigiVis to monitor vision at home. CONCLUSIONS: Self-tested distance VA using DigiVis is accurate, reliable and well accepted by patients. The app has potential to facilitate home monitoring, triage and remote consultation but widescale implementation will require integration with NHS databases and secure patient data storage. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-30 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8403827/ /pubmed/34462579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01760-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Thirunavukarasu, Arun James
Mullinger, Deborah
Rufus-Toye, Remi Mohan
Farrell, Sarah
Allen, Louise E.
Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity
title Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity
title_full Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity
title_fullStr Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity
title_full_unstemmed Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity
title_short Clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity
title_sort clinical validation of a novel web-application for remote assessment of distance visual acuity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34462579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01760-2
work_keys_str_mv AT thirunavukarasuarunjames clinicalvalidationofanovelwebapplicationforremoteassessmentofdistancevisualacuity
AT mullingerdeborah clinicalvalidationofanovelwebapplicationforremoteassessmentofdistancevisualacuity
AT rufustoyeremimohan clinicalvalidationofanovelwebapplicationforremoteassessmentofdistancevisualacuity
AT farrellsarah clinicalvalidationofanovelwebapplicationforremoteassessmentofdistancevisualacuity
AT allenlouisee clinicalvalidationofanovelwebapplicationforremoteassessmentofdistancevisualacuity