Cargando…

Comparative therapeutic efficacy of interferon alfa-2b and combination lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed an enormous threat to public health. The use of antiviral drugs in patients with this disease have triggered people’s attentions. Whether interferon alfa-2b or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus interferon alfa-2b treatment can agai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jingyuan, Du, Chunjing, Pu, Lin, Xiang, Pan, Xiong, Haofeng, Xie, Wen, Chen, Zhihai, Li, Ang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34461841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06595-6
_version_ 1783746083798646784
author Liu, Jingyuan
Du, Chunjing
Pu, Lin
Xiang, Pan
Xiong, Haofeng
Xie, Wen
Chen, Zhihai
Li, Ang
author_facet Liu, Jingyuan
Du, Chunjing
Pu, Lin
Xiang, Pan
Xiong, Haofeng
Xie, Wen
Chen, Zhihai
Li, Ang
author_sort Liu, Jingyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed an enormous threat to public health. The use of antiviral drugs in patients with this disease have triggered people’s attentions. Whether interferon alfa-2b or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus interferon alfa-2b treatment can against SARS-CoV-2 was unknown. The objectives of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interferon alfa-2b and LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b for SARS-CoV-2 infection in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 123 patients confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR on nasopharyngeal swab and symptoms between Jan. 13 and Apr. 23, 2020. All patients received standard supportive care and regular clinical monitoring. Patients were assigned to standard care group (n = 12), interferon alfa-2b group (n = 44), and combination LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b group (n = 67). The primary endpoints were duration of required oxygen support and virus clearance time. Associations between therapies and these outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different among the three groups (P > 0.05). No significant associations were observed between LPV/r/interferon alfa-2b and faster SARS-CoV-2 RNA clearance (HR, 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–1.61]; P = 0.61 in interferon alfa-2b group vs HR, 0.59 [95% CI 0.32–1.11]; P = 0.10 in LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b group). Individual therapy groups also showed no significant association with duration of required oxygen support. There were no significant differences among the three groups in the incidence of adverse events (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, no benefit was observed from interferon alfa-2b or LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b treatment. The findings may provide references for treatment guidelines of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84040232021-08-30 Comparative therapeutic efficacy of interferon alfa-2b and combination lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2 Liu, Jingyuan Du, Chunjing Pu, Lin Xiang, Pan Xiong, Haofeng Xie, Wen Chen, Zhihai Li, Ang BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed an enormous threat to public health. The use of antiviral drugs in patients with this disease have triggered people’s attentions. Whether interferon alfa-2b or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus interferon alfa-2b treatment can against SARS-CoV-2 was unknown. The objectives of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interferon alfa-2b and LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b for SARS-CoV-2 infection in adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 123 patients confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR on nasopharyngeal swab and symptoms between Jan. 13 and Apr. 23, 2020. All patients received standard supportive care and regular clinical monitoring. Patients were assigned to standard care group (n = 12), interferon alfa-2b group (n = 44), and combination LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b group (n = 67). The primary endpoints were duration of required oxygen support and virus clearance time. Associations between therapies and these outcomes were assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different among the three groups (P > 0.05). No significant associations were observed between LPV/r/interferon alfa-2b and faster SARS-CoV-2 RNA clearance (HR, 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–1.61]; P = 0.61 in interferon alfa-2b group vs HR, 0.59 [95% CI 0.32–1.11]; P = 0.10 in LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b group). Individual therapy groups also showed no significant association with duration of required oxygen support. There were no significant differences among the three groups in the incidence of adverse events (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, no benefit was observed from interferon alfa-2b or LPV/r plus interferon alfa-2b treatment. The findings may provide references for treatment guidelines of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. BioMed Central 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8404023/ /pubmed/34461841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06595-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Jingyuan
Du, Chunjing
Pu, Lin
Xiang, Pan
Xiong, Haofeng
Xie, Wen
Chen, Zhihai
Li, Ang
Comparative therapeutic efficacy of interferon alfa-2b and combination lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2
title Comparative therapeutic efficacy of interferon alfa-2b and combination lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2
title_full Comparative therapeutic efficacy of interferon alfa-2b and combination lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Comparative therapeutic efficacy of interferon alfa-2b and combination lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Comparative therapeutic efficacy of interferon alfa-2b and combination lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2
title_short Comparative therapeutic efficacy of interferon alfa-2b and combination lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon alfa-2b against SARS-CoV-2
title_sort comparative therapeutic efficacy of interferon alfa-2b and combination lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon alfa-2b against sars-cov-2
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34461841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06595-6
work_keys_str_mv AT liujingyuan comparativetherapeuticefficacyofinterferonalfa2bandcombinationlopinavirritonavirplusinterferonalfa2bagainstsarscov2
AT duchunjing comparativetherapeuticefficacyofinterferonalfa2bandcombinationlopinavirritonavirplusinterferonalfa2bagainstsarscov2
AT pulin comparativetherapeuticefficacyofinterferonalfa2bandcombinationlopinavirritonavirplusinterferonalfa2bagainstsarscov2
AT xiangpan comparativetherapeuticefficacyofinterferonalfa2bandcombinationlopinavirritonavirplusinterferonalfa2bagainstsarscov2
AT xionghaofeng comparativetherapeuticefficacyofinterferonalfa2bandcombinationlopinavirritonavirplusinterferonalfa2bagainstsarscov2
AT xiewen comparativetherapeuticefficacyofinterferonalfa2bandcombinationlopinavirritonavirplusinterferonalfa2bagainstsarscov2
AT chenzhihai comparativetherapeuticefficacyofinterferonalfa2bandcombinationlopinavirritonavirplusinterferonalfa2bagainstsarscov2
AT liang comparativetherapeuticefficacyofinterferonalfa2bandcombinationlopinavirritonavirplusinterferonalfa2bagainstsarscov2