Cargando…

A rapid test for the environmental detection of pigeon antigen

INTRODUCTION: Avoidance of inhaled bird antigens is essential to prevent hypersensitivity pneumonitis disease progression. The aim of the present study was to develop a sandwich enzyme link immunoassay (ELISA) and an immunochromatographic test (ICT) and compare their ability to detect pigeon antigen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez-Díez, Silvia, Cruz, María-Jesús, Álvarez-Simón, Daniel, Montalvo, Tomás, Muñoz, Xavier, Hoet, Peter M., Vanoirbeek, Jeroen A., Gómez-Ollés, Susana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34134383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147789
_version_ 1783746088328495104
author Sánchez-Díez, Silvia
Cruz, María-Jesús
Álvarez-Simón, Daniel
Montalvo, Tomás
Muñoz, Xavier
Hoet, Peter M.
Vanoirbeek, Jeroen A.
Gómez-Ollés, Susana
author_facet Sánchez-Díez, Silvia
Cruz, María-Jesús
Álvarez-Simón, Daniel
Montalvo, Tomás
Muñoz, Xavier
Hoet, Peter M.
Vanoirbeek, Jeroen A.
Gómez-Ollés, Susana
author_sort Sánchez-Díez, Silvia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Avoidance of inhaled bird antigens is essential to prevent hypersensitivity pneumonitis disease progression. The aim of the present study was to develop a sandwich enzyme link immunoassay (ELISA) and an immunochromatographic test (ICT) and compare their ability to detect pigeon antigens in environmental samples. METHODS: An amplified sandwich ELISA using pigeon serum as a calibration standard and a ICT using gold-labeled anti-pigeon serum antibodies for the rapid detection of pigeon antigens in environmental samples were developed. Twenty-two different airborne samples were collected and analysed using both methods. Strip density values obtained with ICT were calculated and compared with the concentrations determined by the ELISA method for pigeon antigens. Strips results were also visually analysed by five independent evaluators. RESULTS: The ELISA method to quantify pigeon antigen had a broader range (58.4 and 10,112.2 ng/ml), compared to the ICT assay (420 to 3360 ng/ml). A kappa index of 0.736 (p < 0.0001) was obtained between the observers evaluating the ICT strips. The results of the ELISA and the relative density of the ICT showed a highly significant correlation (rs:0.935; p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plot also confirmed excellent agreement between the two methods (mean difference: −1.626; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Since there was a good correlation between both assays, we can conclude that the rapid and simple ICT assay is a good and valid alternative, which does not require expensive equipment, for the validated ELISA technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84040412021-09-20 A rapid test for the environmental detection of pigeon antigen Sánchez-Díez, Silvia Cruz, María-Jesús Álvarez-Simón, Daniel Montalvo, Tomás Muñoz, Xavier Hoet, Peter M. Vanoirbeek, Jeroen A. Gómez-Ollés, Susana Sci Total Environ Article INTRODUCTION: Avoidance of inhaled bird antigens is essential to prevent hypersensitivity pneumonitis disease progression. The aim of the present study was to develop a sandwich enzyme link immunoassay (ELISA) and an immunochromatographic test (ICT) and compare their ability to detect pigeon antigens in environmental samples. METHODS: An amplified sandwich ELISA using pigeon serum as a calibration standard and a ICT using gold-labeled anti-pigeon serum antibodies for the rapid detection of pigeon antigens in environmental samples were developed. Twenty-two different airborne samples were collected and analysed using both methods. Strip density values obtained with ICT were calculated and compared with the concentrations determined by the ELISA method for pigeon antigens. Strips results were also visually analysed by five independent evaluators. RESULTS: The ELISA method to quantify pigeon antigen had a broader range (58.4 and 10,112.2 ng/ml), compared to the ICT assay (420 to 3360 ng/ml). A kappa index of 0.736 (p < 0.0001) was obtained between the observers evaluating the ICT strips. The results of the ELISA and the relative density of the ICT showed a highly significant correlation (rs:0.935; p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plot also confirmed excellent agreement between the two methods (mean difference: −1.626; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Since there was a good correlation between both assays, we can conclude that the rapid and simple ICT assay is a good and valid alternative, which does not require expensive equipment, for the validated ELISA technique. Elsevier 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8404041/ /pubmed/34134383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147789 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sánchez-Díez, Silvia
Cruz, María-Jesús
Álvarez-Simón, Daniel
Montalvo, Tomás
Muñoz, Xavier
Hoet, Peter M.
Vanoirbeek, Jeroen A.
Gómez-Ollés, Susana
A rapid test for the environmental detection of pigeon antigen
title A rapid test for the environmental detection of pigeon antigen
title_full A rapid test for the environmental detection of pigeon antigen
title_fullStr A rapid test for the environmental detection of pigeon antigen
title_full_unstemmed A rapid test for the environmental detection of pigeon antigen
title_short A rapid test for the environmental detection of pigeon antigen
title_sort rapid test for the environmental detection of pigeon antigen
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34134383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147789
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezdiezsilvia arapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT cruzmariajesus arapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT alvarezsimondaniel arapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT montalvotomas arapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT munozxavier arapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT hoetpeterm arapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT vanoirbeekjeroena arapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT gomezollessusana arapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT sanchezdiezsilvia rapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT cruzmariajesus rapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT alvarezsimondaniel rapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT montalvotomas rapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT munozxavier rapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT hoetpeterm rapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT vanoirbeekjeroena rapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen
AT gomezollessusana rapidtestfortheenvironmentaldetectionofpigeonantigen