Cargando…

Point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza is a burden for emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study was to investigate whether point‐of‐care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perlitz, Benjamin, Slagman, Anna, Hitzek, Jennifer, Riedlinger, Dorothee, Möckel, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12857
_version_ 1783746089011118080
author Perlitz, Benjamin
Slagman, Anna
Hitzek, Jennifer
Riedlinger, Dorothee
Möckel, Martin
author_facet Perlitz, Benjamin
Slagman, Anna
Hitzek, Jennifer
Riedlinger, Dorothee
Möckel, Martin
author_sort Perlitz, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza is a burden for emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study was to investigate whether point‐of‐care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether point‐of‐care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. METHODS: Using a cross‐over design, the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B POC PCR test (Liat) was compared with standard clinical practice during the 2019/2020 influenza season. All adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with fever (≥38°C) and respiratory symptoms were included. Primary end points were the prevalence of influenza infections in the ED and staff sick days. Secondary end points were frequency of antiviral and antibacterial therapy, time between admission and test result or treatment initiation, patient disposition, ED length of stay (LOS), and for inpatients mortality and LOS. Nurses were interviewed about handling and integration of POC testing. The occurrence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infections coincided with the second half of the study. RESULTS: A total of 828 patients were enrolled in the study. All 375 patients of the intervention group were tested with Liat, and 103 patients of them (27.6%) tested positive. During the intervention period, staff sick days were reduced by 34.4% (P = .023). Significantly, more patients in the intervention group received antiviral therapy with neuraminidase inhibitors (7.2% vs 3.8%, P = .028) and tested patients received antibiotics more frequently (40.0% vs 31.6%, P = .033). Patients with POC test were transferred to external hospitals significantly more often (5.6% vs 1.3%, P = .01). CONCLUSION: We conclude that POC testing for influenza is useful in the ED, especially if it is heavily frequented by patients with respiratory symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84040452021-09-04 Point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study Perlitz, Benjamin Slagman, Anna Hitzek, Jennifer Riedlinger, Dorothee Möckel, Martin Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza is a burden for emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study was to investigate whether point‐of‐care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether point‐of‐care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. METHODS: Using a cross‐over design, the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B POC PCR test (Liat) was compared with standard clinical practice during the 2019/2020 influenza season. All adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with fever (≥38°C) and respiratory symptoms were included. Primary end points were the prevalence of influenza infections in the ED and staff sick days. Secondary end points were frequency of antiviral and antibacterial therapy, time between admission and test result or treatment initiation, patient disposition, ED length of stay (LOS), and for inpatients mortality and LOS. Nurses were interviewed about handling and integration of POC testing. The occurrence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infections coincided with the second half of the study. RESULTS: A total of 828 patients were enrolled in the study. All 375 patients of the intervention group were tested with Liat, and 103 patients of them (27.6%) tested positive. During the intervention period, staff sick days were reduced by 34.4% (P = .023). Significantly, more patients in the intervention group received antiviral therapy with neuraminidase inhibitors (7.2% vs 3.8%, P = .028) and tested patients received antibiotics more frequently (40.0% vs 31.6%, P = .033). Patients with POC test were transferred to external hospitals significantly more often (5.6% vs 1.3%, P = .01). CONCLUSION: We conclude that POC testing for influenza is useful in the ED, especially if it is heavily frequented by patients with respiratory symptoms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-04 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8404045/ /pubmed/33817983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12857 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Perlitz, Benjamin
Slagman, Anna
Hitzek, Jennifer
Riedlinger, Dorothee
Möckel, Martin
Point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study
title Point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study
title_full Point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study
title_fullStr Point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study
title_short Point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study
title_sort point‐of‐care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: a prospective study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12857
work_keys_str_mv AT perlitzbenjamin pointofcaretestingforinfluenzainauniversityemergencydepartmentaprospectivestudy
AT slagmananna pointofcaretestingforinfluenzainauniversityemergencydepartmentaprospectivestudy
AT hitzekjennifer pointofcaretestingforinfluenzainauniversityemergencydepartmentaprospectivestudy
AT riedlingerdorothee pointofcaretestingforinfluenzainauniversityemergencydepartmentaprospectivestudy
AT mockelmartin pointofcaretestingforinfluenzainauniversityemergencydepartmentaprospectivestudy