Cargando…

Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results

OBJECTIVE: To implement and evaluate co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results and make recommendations for future research and practice. DESIGN: A process evaluation underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. SETTING: Three National Health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chudleigh, Jane, Holder, Pru, Moody, Louise, Simpson, Alan, Southern, Kevin, Morris, Stephen, Fusco, Francesco, Ulph, Fiona, Bryon, Mandy, Bonham, James R, Olander, Ellinor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050773
_version_ 1783746167071309824
author Chudleigh, Jane
Holder, Pru
Moody, Louise
Simpson, Alan
Southern, Kevin
Morris, Stephen
Fusco, Francesco
Ulph, Fiona
Bryon, Mandy
Bonham, James R
Olander, Ellinor
author_facet Chudleigh, Jane
Holder, Pru
Moody, Louise
Simpson, Alan
Southern, Kevin
Morris, Stephen
Fusco, Francesco
Ulph, Fiona
Bryon, Mandy
Bonham, James R
Olander, Ellinor
author_sort Chudleigh, Jane
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To implement and evaluate co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results and make recommendations for future research and practice. DESIGN: A process evaluation underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. SETTING: Three National Health Service provider organisations in England. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four healthcare professionals (7 newborn screening laboratory staff and 24 clinicians) and 18 parents were interviewed. INTERVENTIONS: Three co-designed interventions were implemented in practice: standardised laboratory proformas, communication checklists and an email/letter template. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Acceptability and feasibility of the co-designed interventions. RESULTS: Auditing the implementation of these interventions revealed between 58%–76% of the items on the laboratory proforma and 43%–80% of items on the communication checklists were completed. Interviews with healthcare professionals who had used the interventions in practice provided positive feedback in relation to the purpose of the interventions and the ease of completion both of which were viewed as enhancing communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results. Interviews with parents highlighted the perceived benefit of the co-designed interventions in terms of consistency, pacing and tailoring of information as well as providing reliable information to families following communication of the positive newborn bloodspot screening result. The process evaluation illuminated organisational and contextual barriers during implementation of the co-designed interventions in practice. CONCLUSION: Variations in communication practices for positive newborn bloodspot screening results continue to exist. The co-designed interventions could help to standardise communication of positive newborn screening results from laboratories to clinicians and from clinicians to parents which in turn could improve parents’ experience of receiving a positive newborn bloodspot screening result. Implementation highlighted some organisational and contextual barriers to effective adoption of the co-designed interventions in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15330120.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84044362021-09-14 Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results Chudleigh, Jane Holder, Pru Moody, Louise Simpson, Alan Southern, Kevin Morris, Stephen Fusco, Francesco Ulph, Fiona Bryon, Mandy Bonham, James R Olander, Ellinor BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVE: To implement and evaluate co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results and make recommendations for future research and practice. DESIGN: A process evaluation underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. SETTING: Three National Health Service provider organisations in England. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four healthcare professionals (7 newborn screening laboratory staff and 24 clinicians) and 18 parents were interviewed. INTERVENTIONS: Three co-designed interventions were implemented in practice: standardised laboratory proformas, communication checklists and an email/letter template. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Acceptability and feasibility of the co-designed interventions. RESULTS: Auditing the implementation of these interventions revealed between 58%–76% of the items on the laboratory proforma and 43%–80% of items on the communication checklists were completed. Interviews with healthcare professionals who had used the interventions in practice provided positive feedback in relation to the purpose of the interventions and the ease of completion both of which were viewed as enhancing communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results. Interviews with parents highlighted the perceived benefit of the co-designed interventions in terms of consistency, pacing and tailoring of information as well as providing reliable information to families following communication of the positive newborn bloodspot screening result. The process evaluation illuminated organisational and contextual barriers during implementation of the co-designed interventions in practice. CONCLUSION: Variations in communication practices for positive newborn bloodspot screening results continue to exist. The co-designed interventions could help to standardise communication of positive newborn screening results from laboratories to clinicians and from clinicians to parents which in turn could improve parents’ experience of receiving a positive newborn bloodspot screening result. Implementation highlighted some organisational and contextual barriers to effective adoption of the co-designed interventions in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15330120. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8404436/ /pubmed/34452966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050773 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Chudleigh, Jane
Holder, Pru
Moody, Louise
Simpson, Alan
Southern, Kevin
Morris, Stephen
Fusco, Francesco
Ulph, Fiona
Bryon, Mandy
Bonham, James R
Olander, Ellinor
Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results
title Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results
title_full Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results
title_fullStr Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results
title_full_unstemmed Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results
title_short Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results
title_sort process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050773
work_keys_str_mv AT chudleighjane processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT holderpru processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT moodylouise processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT simpsonalan processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT southernkevin processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT morrisstephen processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT fuscofrancesco processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT ulphfiona processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT bryonmandy processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT bonhamjamesr processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults
AT olanderellinor processevaluationofcodesignedinterventionstoimprovecommunicationofpositivenewbornbloodspotscreeningresults