Cargando…
Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: a scoping review
OBJECTIVES: To scope the evidence surrounding workplace health and safety risks for the remote health workforce in Australia and to collate the recommendations to address those risks. DESIGN: A five-stage scoping review framework refined by Cooper et al was used for this review. Informit Health Coll...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051345 |
_version_ | 1783746167792730112 |
---|---|
author | Wright, Laura Kimberly Jatrana, Santosh Lindsay, David |
author_facet | Wright, Laura Kimberly Jatrana, Santosh Lindsay, David |
author_sort | Wright, Laura Kimberly |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To scope the evidence surrounding workplace health and safety risks for the remote health workforce in Australia and to collate the recommendations to address those risks. DESIGN: A five-stage scoping review framework refined by Cooper et al was used for this review. Informit Health Collection, Ovid Emcare, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest and the grey literature were searched in October 2020 using a combination of key words derived from the eligibility criteria. No date restriction was placed on the search. Title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction were performed by three reviewers. Data were analysed by the lead author using qualitative thematic analysis. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles were eligible for inclusion if they were published research or industry reports, focused on safety for the remote health workforce in Australia, identified hazards/safety risks or recommendations to reduce risk, and were written in English. RESULTS: The search yielded 312 articles, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. A wide range of hazards/safety risks and recommendations were identified within the literature, which related to safety culture, isolation, safe environment, and education and training. Some recommendations, such as the use of a risk management approach, good post-incident support, safer clinics and accommodation, and improved access to education and training, had been discussed in the literature for over a decade, with a high level of agreement regarding their importance. Two articles briefly evaluated the impact of some recommendations. CONCLUSION: While many recommendations have been developed to improve the safety of the remote health workforce in Australia, there is little evidence of their implementation and evaluation. As many remote health professionals report ongoing or worsening workplace safety issues, there is an urgent need for the implementation and evaluation of the workforce safety strategies recommended in the literature and required by legislation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8404439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84044392021-09-14 Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: a scoping review Wright, Laura Kimberly Jatrana, Santosh Lindsay, David BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To scope the evidence surrounding workplace health and safety risks for the remote health workforce in Australia and to collate the recommendations to address those risks. DESIGN: A five-stage scoping review framework refined by Cooper et al was used for this review. Informit Health Collection, Ovid Emcare, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest and the grey literature were searched in October 2020 using a combination of key words derived from the eligibility criteria. No date restriction was placed on the search. Title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction were performed by three reviewers. Data were analysed by the lead author using qualitative thematic analysis. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles were eligible for inclusion if they were published research or industry reports, focused on safety for the remote health workforce in Australia, identified hazards/safety risks or recommendations to reduce risk, and were written in English. RESULTS: The search yielded 312 articles, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. A wide range of hazards/safety risks and recommendations were identified within the literature, which related to safety culture, isolation, safe environment, and education and training. Some recommendations, such as the use of a risk management approach, good post-incident support, safer clinics and accommodation, and improved access to education and training, had been discussed in the literature for over a decade, with a high level of agreement regarding their importance. Two articles briefly evaluated the impact of some recommendations. CONCLUSION: While many recommendations have been developed to improve the safety of the remote health workforce in Australia, there is little evidence of their implementation and evaluation. As many remote health professionals report ongoing or worsening workplace safety issues, there is an urgent need for the implementation and evaluation of the workforce safety strategies recommended in the literature and required by legislation. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8404439/ /pubmed/34452968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051345 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Wright, Laura Kimberly Jatrana, Santosh Lindsay, David Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: a scoping review |
title | Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: a scoping review |
title_full | Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: a scoping review |
title_short | Workforce safety in the remote health sector of Australia: a scoping review |
title_sort | workforce safety in the remote health sector of australia: a scoping review |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34452968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wrightlaurakimberly workforcesafetyintheremotehealthsectorofaustraliaascopingreview AT jatranasantosh workforcesafetyintheremotehealthsectorofaustraliaascopingreview AT lindsaydavid workforcesafetyintheremotehealthsectorofaustraliaascopingreview |