Cargando…

Changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region

BACKGROUND: Few reports have examined dental arch morphology (DAM) after dental implant placement in cleft patients and its actual state is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the presence of changes in DAM and influencing factors in cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) patients who receive implant treatment in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Kilwoo, Sato, Hitoshi, Kurihara, Yuji, Ogura, Hiroshi, Shirota, Tatsuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33342089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.384
_version_ 1783746178234449920
author Ahn, Kilwoo
Sato, Hitoshi
Kurihara, Yuji
Ogura, Hiroshi
Shirota, Tatsuo
author_facet Ahn, Kilwoo
Sato, Hitoshi
Kurihara, Yuji
Ogura, Hiroshi
Shirota, Tatsuo
author_sort Ahn, Kilwoo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few reports have examined dental arch morphology (DAM) after dental implant placement in cleft patients and its actual state is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the presence of changes in DAM and influencing factors in cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) patients who receive implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region. METHODS: Subjects comprised 20 CLP patients in whom maxillary dental arch width (DAW) was evaluated before and after implant treatment based on computed tomography data. First, widths between the canines (W3), between the first premolars (W4), between the second premolars (W5), and between the first molars (W6) were measured before and after surgery. Changes in distance were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, revealing a significant increase in W6. Analysis of Co‐Variance was performed with the difference in W6 after implant treatment as the response variable, and the following six items as explanatory variables: sex; cleft type; age at alveolar bone graft; time to implantation after bone grafting; number of implants; and time after completion of the observation period. RESULTS: The reduction in W6 was larger in the order of complete bilateral CLP, complete unilateral CLP, and unilateral cleft lip and alveolus, and the change decreased with an increasing number of implants. CONCLUSIONS: Implant treatment of the alveolar cleft region may result in a slight reduction in width of the dental arch after treatment completion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84044882021-09-03 Changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region Ahn, Kilwoo Sato, Hitoshi Kurihara, Yuji Ogura, Hiroshi Shirota, Tatsuo Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: Few reports have examined dental arch morphology (DAM) after dental implant placement in cleft patients and its actual state is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the presence of changes in DAM and influencing factors in cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) patients who receive implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region. METHODS: Subjects comprised 20 CLP patients in whom maxillary dental arch width (DAW) was evaluated before and after implant treatment based on computed tomography data. First, widths between the canines (W3), between the first premolars (W4), between the second premolars (W5), and between the first molars (W6) were measured before and after surgery. Changes in distance were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, revealing a significant increase in W6. Analysis of Co‐Variance was performed with the difference in W6 after implant treatment as the response variable, and the following six items as explanatory variables: sex; cleft type; age at alveolar bone graft; time to implantation after bone grafting; number of implants; and time after completion of the observation period. RESULTS: The reduction in W6 was larger in the order of complete bilateral CLP, complete unilateral CLP, and unilateral cleft lip and alveolus, and the change decreased with an increasing number of implants. CONCLUSIONS: Implant treatment of the alveolar cleft region may result in a slight reduction in width of the dental arch after treatment completion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8404488/ /pubmed/33342089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.384 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ahn, Kilwoo
Sato, Hitoshi
Kurihara, Yuji
Ogura, Hiroshi
Shirota, Tatsuo
Changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region
title Changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region
title_full Changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region
title_fullStr Changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region
title_full_unstemmed Changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region
title_short Changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region
title_sort changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33342089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.384
work_keys_str_mv AT ahnkilwoo changesinmaxillarydentalarchmorphologyafterimplanttreatmentinthealveolarcleftregion
AT satohitoshi changesinmaxillarydentalarchmorphologyafterimplanttreatmentinthealveolarcleftregion
AT kuriharayuji changesinmaxillarydentalarchmorphologyafterimplanttreatmentinthealveolarcleftregion
AT ogurahiroshi changesinmaxillarydentalarchmorphologyafterimplanttreatmentinthealveolarcleftregion
AT shirotatatsuo changesinmaxillarydentalarchmorphologyafterimplanttreatmentinthealveolarcleftregion