Cargando…

Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt‐Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of micromotion of dental implants under immediate loading supported by Titanium (Ti) and Cobalt‐Chrome (Co‐Cr) superstructures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A model of tridimensional half‐edentulous maxilla with three dental implants was made usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tobar‐Reyes, Julio, Andueza‐Castro, Luis, Jiménez‐Silva, Antonio, Bustamante‐Plaza, Roger, Carvajal‐Herrera, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.365
_version_ 1783746180118740992
author Tobar‐Reyes, Julio
Andueza‐Castro, Luis
Jiménez‐Silva, Antonio
Bustamante‐Plaza, Roger
Carvajal‐Herrera, Juan
author_facet Tobar‐Reyes, Julio
Andueza‐Castro, Luis
Jiménez‐Silva, Antonio
Bustamante‐Plaza, Roger
Carvajal‐Herrera, Juan
author_sort Tobar‐Reyes, Julio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of micromotion of dental implants under immediate loading supported by Titanium (Ti) and Cobalt‐Chrome (Co‐Cr) superstructures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A model of tridimensional half‐edentulous maxilla with three dental implants was made using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Two standard and one zygomatic implants were connected to a superstructure with an elliptic section of 6x 3 mm (mm). Two study models were established. Model A: Titanium (Ti) alloy superstructure; Model B: Cobalt‐Chrome (Co‐Cr) alloy superstructure. To simulate an immediate‐loading situation, a friction coefficient of 0.71 was applied between the implant and the bone surface. An axial load of 252.04 [N] was applied on standard and zygomatic implants. RESULTS: The Micromotion of dental implants was similar in both superstructure situations. The amount of micromotion was slightly higher in B1 and B3 models (Co‐Cr alloy‐superstructure) compared with A1 and A3 models (Titanium alloy superstructure). The micromotion values in two groups were greater than 150 μm in the incisive region (standard implant) and molar region (zygomatic). In general, the micromotion was higher on the implant that received the load with respect to the other implants. The greater difference was observed when the load was applied on the standard implant A1 (Model A1 = 189.12 μm) compared with standard implant B1(Model B1 = 263.25 μm). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of present study, all implants on different load application points showed micromotion; in general, the amount of micromotion was slightly higher in the implants connected with Co‐Cr alloy superstructure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84044962021-09-03 Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt‐Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis Tobar‐Reyes, Julio Andueza‐Castro, Luis Jiménez‐Silva, Antonio Bustamante‐Plaza, Roger Carvajal‐Herrera, Juan Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of micromotion of dental implants under immediate loading supported by Titanium (Ti) and Cobalt‐Chrome (Co‐Cr) superstructures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A model of tridimensional half‐edentulous maxilla with three dental implants was made using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Two standard and one zygomatic implants were connected to a superstructure with an elliptic section of 6x 3 mm (mm). Two study models were established. Model A: Titanium (Ti) alloy superstructure; Model B: Cobalt‐Chrome (Co‐Cr) alloy superstructure. To simulate an immediate‐loading situation, a friction coefficient of 0.71 was applied between the implant and the bone surface. An axial load of 252.04 [N] was applied on standard and zygomatic implants. RESULTS: The Micromotion of dental implants was similar in both superstructure situations. The amount of micromotion was slightly higher in B1 and B3 models (Co‐Cr alloy‐superstructure) compared with A1 and A3 models (Titanium alloy superstructure). The micromotion values in two groups were greater than 150 μm in the incisive region (standard implant) and molar region (zygomatic). In general, the micromotion was higher on the implant that received the load with respect to the other implants. The greater difference was observed when the load was applied on the standard implant A1 (Model A1 = 189.12 μm) compared with standard implant B1(Model B1 = 263.25 μm). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of present study, all implants on different load application points showed micromotion; in general, the amount of micromotion was slightly higher in the implants connected with Co‐Cr alloy superstructure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8404496/ /pubmed/34042328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.365 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tobar‐Reyes, Julio
Andueza‐Castro, Luis
Jiménez‐Silva, Antonio
Bustamante‐Plaza, Roger
Carvajal‐Herrera, Juan
Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt‐Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis
title Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt‐Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis
title_full Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt‐Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis
title_fullStr Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt‐Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt‐Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis
title_short Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt‐Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis
title_sort micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with titanium and cobalt‐chrome superstructures. 3d finite element analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.365
work_keys_str_mv AT tobarreyesjulio micromotionanalysisofimmediatelyloadedimplantswithtitaniumandcobaltchromesuperstructures3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT anduezacastroluis micromotionanalysisofimmediatelyloadedimplantswithtitaniumandcobaltchromesuperstructures3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT jimenezsilvaantonio micromotionanalysisofimmediatelyloadedimplantswithtitaniumandcobaltchromesuperstructures3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT bustamanteplazaroger micromotionanalysisofimmediatelyloadedimplantswithtitaniumandcobaltchromesuperstructures3dfiniteelementanalysis
AT carvajalherrerajuan micromotionanalysisofimmediatelyloadedimplantswithtitaniumandcobaltchromesuperstructures3dfiniteelementanalysis