Cargando…
Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR). METHODS: Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33989056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210153 |
_version_ | 1783746183436435456 |
---|---|
author | Belmans, Niels Oenning, Anne Caroline Salmon, Benjamin Baselet, Bjorn Tabury, Kevin Lucas, Stéphane Lambrichts, Ivo Moreels, Marjan Jacobs, Reinhilde Baatout, Sarah |
author_facet | Belmans, Niels Oenning, Anne Caroline Salmon, Benjamin Baselet, Bjorn Tabury, Kevin Lucas, Stéphane Lambrichts, Ivo Moreels, Marjan Jacobs, Reinhilde Baatout, Sarah |
author_sort | Belmans, Niels |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR). METHODS: Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobiological outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields. RESULTS: There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dentomaxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8404518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84045182022-09-01 Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? Belmans, Niels Oenning, Anne Caroline Salmon, Benjamin Baselet, Bjorn Tabury, Kevin Lucas, Stéphane Lambrichts, Ivo Moreels, Marjan Jacobs, Reinhilde Baatout, Sarah Dentomaxillofac Radiol DMFR 50th Anniversary: Review Article OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR). METHODS: Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobiological outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields. RESULTS: There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dentomaxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables. The British Institute of Radiology. 2021-09-01 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8404518/ /pubmed/33989056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210153 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | DMFR 50th Anniversary: Review Article Belmans, Niels Oenning, Anne Caroline Salmon, Benjamin Baselet, Bjorn Tabury, Kevin Lucas, Stéphane Lambrichts, Ivo Moreels, Marjan Jacobs, Reinhilde Baatout, Sarah Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? |
title | Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? |
title_full | Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? |
title_fullStr | Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? |
title_short | Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? |
title_sort | radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? |
topic | DMFR 50th Anniversary: Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33989056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belmansniels radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned AT oenningannecaroline radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned AT salmonbenjamin radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned AT baseletbjorn radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned AT taburykevin radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned AT lucasstephane radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned AT lambrichtsivo radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned AT moreelsmarjan radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned AT jacobsreinhilde radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned AT baatoutsarah radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned |