Cargando…

Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?

OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR). METHODS: Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belmans, Niels, Oenning, Anne Caroline, Salmon, Benjamin, Baselet, Bjorn, Tabury, Kevin, Lucas, Stéphane, Lambrichts, Ivo, Moreels, Marjan, Jacobs, Reinhilde, Baatout, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33989056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210153
_version_ 1783746183436435456
author Belmans, Niels
Oenning, Anne Caroline
Salmon, Benjamin
Baselet, Bjorn
Tabury, Kevin
Lucas, Stéphane
Lambrichts, Ivo
Moreels, Marjan
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Baatout, Sarah
author_facet Belmans, Niels
Oenning, Anne Caroline
Salmon, Benjamin
Baselet, Bjorn
Tabury, Kevin
Lucas, Stéphane
Lambrichts, Ivo
Moreels, Marjan
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Baatout, Sarah
author_sort Belmans, Niels
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR). METHODS: Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobiological outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields. RESULTS: There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dentomaxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84045182022-09-01 Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? Belmans, Niels Oenning, Anne Caroline Salmon, Benjamin Baselet, Bjorn Tabury, Kevin Lucas, Stéphane Lambrichts, Ivo Moreels, Marjan Jacobs, Reinhilde Baatout, Sarah Dentomaxillofac Radiol DMFR 50th Anniversary: Review Article OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR). METHODS: Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobiological outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields. RESULTS: There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dentomaxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables. The British Institute of Radiology. 2021-09-01 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8404518/ /pubmed/33989056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210153 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle DMFR 50th Anniversary: Review Article
Belmans, Niels
Oenning, Anne Caroline
Salmon, Benjamin
Baselet, Bjorn
Tabury, Kevin
Lucas, Stéphane
Lambrichts, Ivo
Moreels, Marjan
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Baatout, Sarah
Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
title Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
title_full Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
title_fullStr Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
title_full_unstemmed Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
title_short Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
title_sort radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?
topic DMFR 50th Anniversary: Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33989056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210153
work_keys_str_mv AT belmansniels radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned
AT oenningannecaroline radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned
AT salmonbenjamin radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned
AT baseletbjorn radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned
AT taburykevin radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned
AT lucasstephane radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned
AT lambrichtsivo radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned
AT moreelsmarjan radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned
AT jacobsreinhilde radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned
AT baatoutsarah radiobiologicalrisksfollowingdentomaxillofacialimagingshouldwebeconcerned