Cargando…

Preoperative mitral annulus size – Can we get it right?

OBJECTIVE: We looked for a correlation between the surgically measured mitral valve size and the cardiac dimensions (left ventricle internal diameter, left atrial size, aorta size, and body surface area) measured by preoperative and intraoperative echocardiography. We also assessed to see if we coul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panicker, Varghese T., Sreekantan, Renjith, Lokanath, Nagananda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269261
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_91_20
_version_ 1783746196470235136
author Panicker, Varghese T.
Sreekantan, Renjith
Lokanath, Nagananda
author_facet Panicker, Varghese T.
Sreekantan, Renjith
Lokanath, Nagananda
author_sort Panicker, Varghese T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We looked for a correlation between the surgically measured mitral valve size and the cardiac dimensions (left ventricle internal diameter, left atrial size, aorta size, and body surface area) measured by preoperative and intraoperative echocardiography. We also assessed to see if we could predict the mitral prosthesis size based on the correlation data obtained. METHODS: The hospital records of 180 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with TTK Chitra valve between January 2008 and December 2012 at our hospital, were studied. The correlation between surgically measured mitral annulus size to left ventricular internal diameter systolic (LVIDS) and diastolic (LVIDD), left atrial size (linear measurement), and aorta size on echocardiography and body surface area was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Mean LVIDS was calculated for each valve prosthesis size separately and the correlation was studied. RESULTS: The correlation between mitral valve prosthesis size and left ventricular internal diameter (systolic) showed a Pearson coefficient of 3.3 with significance at the level 0.01. Mitral valve size and left atrial size showed a correlation coefficient of 2.7 with significance at the level 0.01. The correlation coefficient for mitral valve size with left ventricular internal diameter diastolic, aorta and body surface area were 2.5, 1.9, and 1.8, respectively. There was a gradual increase in the mean LVIDS with increase in the prosthetic valve size. Box plot and scatter plot showed linear correlation between valve size and mean LVIDS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84045882021-09-07 Preoperative mitral annulus size – Can we get it right? Panicker, Varghese T. Sreekantan, Renjith Lokanath, Nagananda Ann Card Anaesth Original Article OBJECTIVE: We looked for a correlation between the surgically measured mitral valve size and the cardiac dimensions (left ventricle internal diameter, left atrial size, aorta size, and body surface area) measured by preoperative and intraoperative echocardiography. We also assessed to see if we could predict the mitral prosthesis size based on the correlation data obtained. METHODS: The hospital records of 180 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with TTK Chitra valve between January 2008 and December 2012 at our hospital, were studied. The correlation between surgically measured mitral annulus size to left ventricular internal diameter systolic (LVIDS) and diastolic (LVIDD), left atrial size (linear measurement), and aorta size on echocardiography and body surface area was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Mean LVIDS was calculated for each valve prosthesis size separately and the correlation was studied. RESULTS: The correlation between mitral valve prosthesis size and left ventricular internal diameter (systolic) showed a Pearson coefficient of 3.3 with significance at the level 0.01. Mitral valve size and left atrial size showed a correlation coefficient of 2.7 with significance at the level 0.01. The correlation coefficient for mitral valve size with left ventricular internal diameter diastolic, aorta and body surface area were 2.5, 1.9, and 1.8, respectively. There was a gradual increase in the mean LVIDS with increase in the prosthetic valve size. Box plot and scatter plot showed linear correlation between valve size and mean LVIDS. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8404588/ /pubmed/34269261 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_91_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Panicker, Varghese T.
Sreekantan, Renjith
Lokanath, Nagananda
Preoperative mitral annulus size – Can we get it right?
title Preoperative mitral annulus size – Can we get it right?
title_full Preoperative mitral annulus size – Can we get it right?
title_fullStr Preoperative mitral annulus size – Can we get it right?
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative mitral annulus size – Can we get it right?
title_short Preoperative mitral annulus size – Can we get it right?
title_sort preoperative mitral annulus size – can we get it right?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269261
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_91_20
work_keys_str_mv AT panickervargheset preoperativemitralannulussizecanwegetitright
AT sreekantanrenjith preoperativemitralannulussizecanwegetitright
AT lokanathnagananda preoperativemitralannulussizecanwegetitright