Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation and inferior vena cava distensibility index for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation between stroke volume variation (SVV) and inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC) as a marker for fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated hypotensive intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN: This study is designed as prospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Kaminder Bir, Nakra, Monish, Mangal, Vishal, Singh, Shalendra, Taank, Priya, Marwah, Vikas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269263
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_113_20
_version_ 1783746200661393408
author Kaur, Kaminder Bir
Nakra, Monish
Mangal, Vishal
Singh, Shalendra
Taank, Priya
Marwah, Vikas
author_facet Kaur, Kaminder Bir
Nakra, Monish
Mangal, Vishal
Singh, Shalendra
Taank, Priya
Marwah, Vikas
author_sort Kaur, Kaminder Bir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation between stroke volume variation (SVV) and inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC) as a marker for fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated hypotensive intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN: This study is designed as prospective observational study conducted in patients admitted to an ICU who were mechanically ventilated and experienced a hypotensive episode. INTERVENTION: A fluid challenge of 10 mL/kg ringer’s lactate was given over 20 min. MEASUREMENTS: Hemodynamic parameters as well as SVV, IVCmax, IVCmin, dIVC, and cardiac output (CO), were recorded at a different time interval. An increase in ≥15% of CO was taken as fluid responsiveness. RESULTS: Out of 67 patients, 67.2% responded to fluid challenge. Pearson’s correlation graph at baseline showed a strong positive correlation between dIVC and SVV with r = 0.453, (P < 0.002). Non-responders also had a strong positive correlation (r = 0.474) at the baseline. Bland Altman’s analysis of the correlation between dIVC and SVV post-fluid challenge showed a mean difference of – 4.444, with 1.49% of the values falling outside the limits of agreement (18.418 and -27.306). This difference was clinically significant. Pearson’s correlation graph post-fluid challenge showed a moderately strong positive correlation between dIVC and SVV with r = 0.298 and P value = 0.047, which was statistically significant. Also, non-responders had a weak correlation as compared to the responder’s group, r = 0.364 and P value = 0.095, which was not clinically significant. There was no significant difference in the trend of dIVC and SVV values between the non-surgical and surgical groups, nor was there any gender difference analyzed in the study. CONCLUSION: This study ascertains the positive correlation between dIVC and SVV and justifies its use in a clinical setting of hypotension suspected to be due to hypovolemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84046062021-09-07 Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation and inferior vena cava distensibility index for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients Kaur, Kaminder Bir Nakra, Monish Mangal, Vishal Singh, Shalendra Taank, Priya Marwah, Vikas Ann Card Anaesth Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation between stroke volume variation (SVV) and inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC) as a marker for fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated hypotensive intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN: This study is designed as prospective observational study conducted in patients admitted to an ICU who were mechanically ventilated and experienced a hypotensive episode. INTERVENTION: A fluid challenge of 10 mL/kg ringer’s lactate was given over 20 min. MEASUREMENTS: Hemodynamic parameters as well as SVV, IVCmax, IVCmin, dIVC, and cardiac output (CO), were recorded at a different time interval. An increase in ≥15% of CO was taken as fluid responsiveness. RESULTS: Out of 67 patients, 67.2% responded to fluid challenge. Pearson’s correlation graph at baseline showed a strong positive correlation between dIVC and SVV with r = 0.453, (P < 0.002). Non-responders also had a strong positive correlation (r = 0.474) at the baseline. Bland Altman’s analysis of the correlation between dIVC and SVV post-fluid challenge showed a mean difference of – 4.444, with 1.49% of the values falling outside the limits of agreement (18.418 and -27.306). This difference was clinically significant. Pearson’s correlation graph post-fluid challenge showed a moderately strong positive correlation between dIVC and SVV with r = 0.298 and P value = 0.047, which was statistically significant. Also, non-responders had a weak correlation as compared to the responder’s group, r = 0.364 and P value = 0.095, which was not clinically significant. There was no significant difference in the trend of dIVC and SVV values between the non-surgical and surgical groups, nor was there any gender difference analyzed in the study. CONCLUSION: This study ascertains the positive correlation between dIVC and SVV and justifies its use in a clinical setting of hypotension suspected to be due to hypovolemia. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8404606/ /pubmed/34269263 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_113_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaur, Kaminder Bir
Nakra, Monish
Mangal, Vishal
Singh, Shalendra
Taank, Priya
Marwah, Vikas
Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation and inferior vena cava distensibility index for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients
title Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation and inferior vena cava distensibility index for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients
title_full Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation and inferior vena cava distensibility index for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation and inferior vena cava distensibility index for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation and inferior vena cava distensibility index for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients
title_short Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation and inferior vena cava distensibility index for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients
title_sort comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation and inferior vena cava distensibility index for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269263
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_113_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurkaminderbir comparativeevaluationofstrokevolumevariationandinferiorvenacavadistensibilityindexforpredictionoffluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT nakramonish comparativeevaluationofstrokevolumevariationandinferiorvenacavadistensibilityindexforpredictionoffluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT mangalvishal comparativeevaluationofstrokevolumevariationandinferiorvenacavadistensibilityindexforpredictionoffluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT singhshalendra comparativeevaluationofstrokevolumevariationandinferiorvenacavadistensibilityindexforpredictionoffluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT taankpriya comparativeevaluationofstrokevolumevariationandinferiorvenacavadistensibilityindexforpredictionoffluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT marwahvikas comparativeevaluationofstrokevolumevariationandinferiorvenacavadistensibilityindexforpredictionoffluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatients