Cargando…

Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations

INTRODUCTION: The field of implementation science is the study of methods that promote the uptake of evidence-based interventions into healthcare policy and practice. While acupuncture has gained significant traction in the American healthcare landscape, its journey has been somewhat haphazard and n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, David W., Roseen, Eric J., Stone, Jennifer A.M., Gardiner, Paula, Olson, Juli, Rosen, Shellie, Wayne, Peter, Davis, Robert, Coeytaux, Remy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21649561211042574
_version_ 1783746214002425856
author Miller, David W.
Roseen, Eric J.
Stone, Jennifer A.M.
Gardiner, Paula
Olson, Juli
Rosen, Shellie
Wayne, Peter
Davis, Robert
Coeytaux, Remy
author_facet Miller, David W.
Roseen, Eric J.
Stone, Jennifer A.M.
Gardiner, Paula
Olson, Juli
Rosen, Shellie
Wayne, Peter
Davis, Robert
Coeytaux, Remy
author_sort Miller, David W.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The field of implementation science is the study of methods that promote the uptake of evidence-based interventions into healthcare policy and practice. While acupuncture has gained significant traction in the American healthcare landscape, its journey has been somewhat haphazard and non-linear. METHODS: In June 2019, a group of thirty diverse stakeholders was convened by the Society for Acupuncture Research with the support of a Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Eugene Washington Engagement Award. This group of stakeholders represented a diverse mix of patients, providers, academicians, researchers, funders, allied health professionals, insurers, association leaders, certification experts, and military program developers. The collective engaged in discussion that explored acupuncture’s status in healthcare, including reflections on its safety, effectiveness, best practices, and the actual implementation of acupuncture as seen from diverse stakeholder viewpoints. OBJECTIVES: A primary goal was to consider how to utilize knowledge from the field of implementation science more systematically and intentionally to disseminate information about acupuncture and its research base, through application of methods known to implementation science. The group also considered novel challenges that acupuncture may present to known implementation processes. FINDINGS: This article summarizes the initial findings of this in-person meeting of stakeholders and the ongoing discussion among the subject matter experts who authored this report. The goal of this report is to catalyze greater conversation about how the field of implementation science might intersect with practice, access, research, and policymaking pertaining to acupuncture. Core concepts of implementation science and its relationship to acupuncture are introduced, and the case for acupuncture as an Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is established. The status of the field and current environment of acupuncture is examined, and the perspectives of four stakeholder groups––patients, two types of professional practitioners, and researchers––are explored in more detail.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84046662021-08-31 Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations Miller, David W. Roseen, Eric J. Stone, Jennifer A.M. Gardiner, Paula Olson, Juli Rosen, Shellie Wayne, Peter Davis, Robert Coeytaux, Remy Glob Adv Health Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: The field of implementation science is the study of methods that promote the uptake of evidence-based interventions into healthcare policy and practice. While acupuncture has gained significant traction in the American healthcare landscape, its journey has been somewhat haphazard and non-linear. METHODS: In June 2019, a group of thirty diverse stakeholders was convened by the Society for Acupuncture Research with the support of a Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Eugene Washington Engagement Award. This group of stakeholders represented a diverse mix of patients, providers, academicians, researchers, funders, allied health professionals, insurers, association leaders, certification experts, and military program developers. The collective engaged in discussion that explored acupuncture’s status in healthcare, including reflections on its safety, effectiveness, best practices, and the actual implementation of acupuncture as seen from diverse stakeholder viewpoints. OBJECTIVES: A primary goal was to consider how to utilize knowledge from the field of implementation science more systematically and intentionally to disseminate information about acupuncture and its research base, through application of methods known to implementation science. The group also considered novel challenges that acupuncture may present to known implementation processes. FINDINGS: This article summarizes the initial findings of this in-person meeting of stakeholders and the ongoing discussion among the subject matter experts who authored this report. The goal of this report is to catalyze greater conversation about how the field of implementation science might intersect with practice, access, research, and policymaking pertaining to acupuncture. Core concepts of implementation science and its relationship to acupuncture are introduced, and the case for acupuncture as an Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is established. The status of the field and current environment of acupuncture is examined, and the perspectives of four stakeholder groups––patients, two types of professional practitioners, and researchers––are explored in more detail. SAGE Publications 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8404666/ /pubmed/34471570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21649561211042574 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Miller, David W.
Roseen, Eric J.
Stone, Jennifer A.M.
Gardiner, Paula
Olson, Juli
Rosen, Shellie
Wayne, Peter
Davis, Robert
Coeytaux, Remy
Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations
title Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations
title_full Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations
title_fullStr Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations
title_short Incorporating Acupuncture Into American Healthcare: Initiating a Discussion on Implementation Science, the Status of the Field, and Stakeholder Considerations
title_sort incorporating acupuncture into american healthcare: initiating a discussion on implementation science, the status of the field, and stakeholder considerations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21649561211042574
work_keys_str_mv AT millerdavidw incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations
AT roseenericj incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations
AT stonejenniferam incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations
AT gardinerpaula incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations
AT olsonjuli incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations
AT rosenshellie incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations
AT waynepeter incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations
AT davisrobert incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations
AT coeytauxremy incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations
AT incorporatingacupunctureintoamericanhealthcareinitiatingadiscussiononimplementationsciencethestatusofthefieldandstakeholderconsiderations