Cargando…
Evaluation of 360° Image Projection Formats; Comparing Format Conversion Distortion Using Objective Quality Metrics
Currently available 360° cameras normally capture several images covering a scene in all directions around a shooting point. The captured images are spherical in nature and are mapped to a two-dimensional plane using various projection methods. Many projection formats have been proposed for 360° vid...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7080137 |
_version_ | 1783746231987601408 |
---|---|
author | Hussain, Ikram Kwon, Oh-Jin |
author_facet | Hussain, Ikram Kwon, Oh-Jin |
author_sort | Hussain, Ikram |
collection | PubMed |
description | Currently available 360° cameras normally capture several images covering a scene in all directions around a shooting point. The captured images are spherical in nature and are mapped to a two-dimensional plane using various projection methods. Many projection formats have been proposed for 360° videos. However, standards for a quality assessment of 360° images are limited. In this paper, various projection formats are compared to explore the problem of distortion caused by a mapping operation, which has been a considerable challenge in recent approaches. The performances of various projection formats, including equi-rectangular, equal-area, cylindrical, cube-map, and their modified versions, are evaluated based on the conversion causing the least amount of distortion when the format is changed. The evaluation is conducted using sample images selected based on several attributes that determine the perceptual image quality. The evaluation results based on the objective quality metrics have proved that the hybrid equi-angular cube-map format is the most appropriate solution as a common format in 360° image services for where format conversions are frequently demanded. This study presents findings ranking these formats that are useful for identifying the best image format for a future standard. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8404912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84049122021-10-28 Evaluation of 360° Image Projection Formats; Comparing Format Conversion Distortion Using Objective Quality Metrics Hussain, Ikram Kwon, Oh-Jin J Imaging Article Currently available 360° cameras normally capture several images covering a scene in all directions around a shooting point. The captured images are spherical in nature and are mapped to a two-dimensional plane using various projection methods. Many projection formats have been proposed for 360° videos. However, standards for a quality assessment of 360° images are limited. In this paper, various projection formats are compared to explore the problem of distortion caused by a mapping operation, which has been a considerable challenge in recent approaches. The performances of various projection formats, including equi-rectangular, equal-area, cylindrical, cube-map, and their modified versions, are evaluated based on the conversion causing the least amount of distortion when the format is changed. The evaluation is conducted using sample images selected based on several attributes that determine the perceptual image quality. The evaluation results based on the objective quality metrics have proved that the hybrid equi-angular cube-map format is the most appropriate solution as a common format in 360° image services for where format conversions are frequently demanded. This study presents findings ranking these formats that are useful for identifying the best image format for a future standard. MDPI 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8404912/ /pubmed/34460774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7080137 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hussain, Ikram Kwon, Oh-Jin Evaluation of 360° Image Projection Formats; Comparing Format Conversion Distortion Using Objective Quality Metrics |
title | Evaluation of 360° Image Projection Formats; Comparing Format Conversion Distortion Using Objective Quality Metrics |
title_full | Evaluation of 360° Image Projection Formats; Comparing Format Conversion Distortion Using Objective Quality Metrics |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of 360° Image Projection Formats; Comparing Format Conversion Distortion Using Objective Quality Metrics |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of 360° Image Projection Formats; Comparing Format Conversion Distortion Using Objective Quality Metrics |
title_short | Evaluation of 360° Image Projection Formats; Comparing Format Conversion Distortion Using Objective Quality Metrics |
title_sort | evaluation of 360° image projection formats; comparing format conversion distortion using objective quality metrics |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7080137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hussainikram evaluationof360imageprojectionformatscomparingformatconversiondistortionusingobjectivequalitymetrics AT kwonohjin evaluationof360imageprojectionformatscomparingformatconversiondistortionusingobjectivequalitymetrics |