Cargando…

Direct and Indirect vSLAM Fusion for Augmented Reality

Augmented reality (AR) is an emerging technology that is applied in many fields. One of the limitations that still prevents AR to be even more widely used relates to the accessibility of devices. Indeed, the devices currently used are usually high end, expensive glasses or mobile devices. vSLAM (vis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Outahar, Mohamed, Moreau, Guillaume, Normand, Jean-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460777
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7080141
_version_ 1783746236439855104
author Outahar, Mohamed
Moreau, Guillaume
Normand, Jean-Marie
author_facet Outahar, Mohamed
Moreau, Guillaume
Normand, Jean-Marie
author_sort Outahar, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description Augmented reality (AR) is an emerging technology that is applied in many fields. One of the limitations that still prevents AR to be even more widely used relates to the accessibility of devices. Indeed, the devices currently used are usually high end, expensive glasses or mobile devices. vSLAM (visual simultaneous localization and mapping) algorithms circumvent this problem by requiring relatively cheap cameras for AR. vSLAM algorithms can be classified as direct or indirect methods based on the type of data used. Each class of algorithms works optimally on a type of scene (e.g., textured or untextured) but unfortunately with little overlap. In this work, a method is proposed to fuse a direct and an indirect methods in order to have a higher robustness and to offer the possibility for AR to move seamlessly between different types of scenes. Our method is tested on three datasets against state-of-the-art direct (LSD-SLAM), semi-direct (LCSD) and indirect (ORBSLAM2) algorithms in two different scenarios: a trajectory planning and an AR scenario where a virtual object is displayed on top of the video feed; furthermore, a similar method (LCSD SLAM) is also compared to our proposal. Results show that our fusion algorithm is generally as efficient as the best algorithm both in terms of trajectory (mean errors with respect to ground truth trajectory measurements) as well as in terms of quality of the augmentation (robustness and stability). In short, we can propose a fusion algorithm that, in our tests, takes the best of both the direct and indirect methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8404931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84049312021-10-28 Direct and Indirect vSLAM Fusion for Augmented Reality Outahar, Mohamed Moreau, Guillaume Normand, Jean-Marie J Imaging Article Augmented reality (AR) is an emerging technology that is applied in many fields. One of the limitations that still prevents AR to be even more widely used relates to the accessibility of devices. Indeed, the devices currently used are usually high end, expensive glasses or mobile devices. vSLAM (visual simultaneous localization and mapping) algorithms circumvent this problem by requiring relatively cheap cameras for AR. vSLAM algorithms can be classified as direct or indirect methods based on the type of data used. Each class of algorithms works optimally on a type of scene (e.g., textured or untextured) but unfortunately with little overlap. In this work, a method is proposed to fuse a direct and an indirect methods in order to have a higher robustness and to offer the possibility for AR to move seamlessly between different types of scenes. Our method is tested on three datasets against state-of-the-art direct (LSD-SLAM), semi-direct (LCSD) and indirect (ORBSLAM2) algorithms in two different scenarios: a trajectory planning and an AR scenario where a virtual object is displayed on top of the video feed; furthermore, a similar method (LCSD SLAM) is also compared to our proposal. Results show that our fusion algorithm is generally as efficient as the best algorithm both in terms of trajectory (mean errors with respect to ground truth trajectory measurements) as well as in terms of quality of the augmentation (robustness and stability). In short, we can propose a fusion algorithm that, in our tests, takes the best of both the direct and indirect methods. MDPI 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8404931/ /pubmed/34460777 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7080141 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Outahar, Mohamed
Moreau, Guillaume
Normand, Jean-Marie
Direct and Indirect vSLAM Fusion for Augmented Reality
title Direct and Indirect vSLAM Fusion for Augmented Reality
title_full Direct and Indirect vSLAM Fusion for Augmented Reality
title_fullStr Direct and Indirect vSLAM Fusion for Augmented Reality
title_full_unstemmed Direct and Indirect vSLAM Fusion for Augmented Reality
title_short Direct and Indirect vSLAM Fusion for Augmented Reality
title_sort direct and indirect vslam fusion for augmented reality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460777
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7080141
work_keys_str_mv AT outaharmohamed directandindirectvslamfusionforaugmentedreality
AT moreauguillaume directandindirectvslamfusionforaugmentedreality
AT normandjeanmarie directandindirectvslamfusionforaugmentedreality