Cargando…
Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews for the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of individuals with rotator cuff syndrome; to compare, through the Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR) instrument, the quality of studies found in the Co...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710334 |
_version_ | 1783746293516992512 |
---|---|
author | Estevam, Jhony de Almeida Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas Kriebel, Carolina Falconi Peccin, Maria Stella |
author_facet | Estevam, Jhony de Almeida Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas Kriebel, Carolina Falconi Peccin, Maria Stella |
author_sort | Estevam, Jhony de Almeida |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews for the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of individuals with rotator cuff syndrome; to compare, through the Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR) instrument, the quality of studies found in the Cochrane Library, PubMed (Publisher Medline ), EMBASE andQinsightdatabases. Methods This is a descriptive and comparative cross-sectional study, in which two independent authors analyzed, through the AMSTAR instrument, the methodological quality of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews on the treatment of individuals diagnosed with rotator cuff syndrome. Results A total of 76 systematic reviews were evaluated by the AMSTAR instrument. The overall mean score was 6.1 (±2.1) and the mean per database was 9.1 (±0.9) for the Cochrane reviews and 5.7 (±1.8) for the non-Cochrane reviews. The lowest-scoring item of AMSTAR was 11, related to the display of the conflict of interests of the publication. In a comparative analysis of the final variable score, there was a statistical difference between the Cochrane and non-Cochrane studies. Conclusion According to the present study, systematic reviews using the Cochrane methodology have a better methodological quality compared to non-Cochrane studies on the treatment of rotator cuff dysfunctions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8405256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84052562021-09-03 Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease Estevam, Jhony de Almeida Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas Kriebel, Carolina Falconi Peccin, Maria Stella Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews for the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of individuals with rotator cuff syndrome; to compare, through the Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR) instrument, the quality of studies found in the Cochrane Library, PubMed (Publisher Medline ), EMBASE andQinsightdatabases. Methods This is a descriptive and comparative cross-sectional study, in which two independent authors analyzed, through the AMSTAR instrument, the methodological quality of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews on the treatment of individuals diagnosed with rotator cuff syndrome. Results A total of 76 systematic reviews were evaluated by the AMSTAR instrument. The overall mean score was 6.1 (±2.1) and the mean per database was 9.1 (±0.9) for the Cochrane reviews and 5.7 (±1.8) for the non-Cochrane reviews. The lowest-scoring item of AMSTAR was 11, related to the display of the conflict of interests of the publication. In a comparative analysis of the final variable score, there was a statistical difference between the Cochrane and non-Cochrane studies. Conclusion According to the present study, systematic reviews using the Cochrane methodology have a better methodological quality compared to non-Cochrane studies on the treatment of rotator cuff dysfunctions. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021-08 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8405256/ /pubmed/34483393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710334 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Estevam, Jhony de Almeida Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas Kriebel, Carolina Falconi Peccin, Maria Stella Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease |
title |
Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
|
title_full |
Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
|
title_fullStr |
Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
|
title_short |
Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
|
title_sort | methodological quality analysis of systematic review for the treatment of rotator cuff disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estevamjhonydealmeida methodologicalqualityanalysisofsystematicreviewforthetreatmentofrotatorcuffdisease AT francoeduardosignorinibicas methodologicalqualityanalysisofsystematicreviewforthetreatmentofrotatorcuffdisease AT kriebelcarolinafalconi methodologicalqualityanalysisofsystematicreviewforthetreatmentofrotatorcuffdisease AT peccinmariastella methodologicalqualityanalysisofsystematicreviewforthetreatmentofrotatorcuffdisease |