Cargando…

Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease

Objective  To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews for the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of individuals with rotator cuff syndrome; to compare, through the Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR) instrument, the quality of studies found in the Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estevam, Jhony de Almeida, Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas, Kriebel, Carolina Falconi, Peccin, Maria Stella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710334
_version_ 1783746293516992512
author Estevam, Jhony de Almeida
Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas
Kriebel, Carolina Falconi
Peccin, Maria Stella
author_facet Estevam, Jhony de Almeida
Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas
Kriebel, Carolina Falconi
Peccin, Maria Stella
author_sort Estevam, Jhony de Almeida
collection PubMed
description Objective  To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews for the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of individuals with rotator cuff syndrome; to compare, through the Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR) instrument, the quality of studies found in the Cochrane Library, PubMed (Publisher Medline ), EMBASE andQinsightdatabases. Methods  This is a descriptive and comparative cross-sectional study, in which two independent authors analyzed, through the AMSTAR instrument, the methodological quality of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews on the treatment of individuals diagnosed with rotator cuff syndrome. Results  A total of 76 systematic reviews were evaluated by the AMSTAR instrument. The overall mean score was 6.1 (±2.1) and the mean per database was 9.1 (±0.9) for the Cochrane reviews and 5.7 (±1.8) for the non-Cochrane reviews. The lowest-scoring item of AMSTAR was 11, related to the display of the conflict of interests of the publication. In a comparative analysis of the final variable score, there was a statistical difference between the Cochrane and non-Cochrane studies. Conclusion  According to the present study, systematic reviews using the Cochrane methodology have a better methodological quality compared to non-Cochrane studies on the treatment of rotator cuff dysfunctions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8405256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84052562021-09-03 Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease Estevam, Jhony de Almeida Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas Kriebel, Carolina Falconi Peccin, Maria Stella Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective  To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews for the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of individuals with rotator cuff syndrome; to compare, through the Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR) instrument, the quality of studies found in the Cochrane Library, PubMed (Publisher Medline ), EMBASE andQinsightdatabases. Methods  This is a descriptive and comparative cross-sectional study, in which two independent authors analyzed, through the AMSTAR instrument, the methodological quality of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews on the treatment of individuals diagnosed with rotator cuff syndrome. Results  A total of 76 systematic reviews were evaluated by the AMSTAR instrument. The overall mean score was 6.1 (±2.1) and the mean per database was 9.1 (±0.9) for the Cochrane reviews and 5.7 (±1.8) for the non-Cochrane reviews. The lowest-scoring item of AMSTAR was 11, related to the display of the conflict of interests of the publication. In a comparative analysis of the final variable score, there was a statistical difference between the Cochrane and non-Cochrane studies. Conclusion  According to the present study, systematic reviews using the Cochrane methodology have a better methodological quality compared to non-Cochrane studies on the treatment of rotator cuff dysfunctions. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021-08 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8405256/ /pubmed/34483393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710334 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Estevam, Jhony de Almeida
Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas
Kriebel, Carolina Falconi
Peccin, Maria Stella
Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
title Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
title_full Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
title_fullStr Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
title_short Methodological Quality Analysis of Systematic Review for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease
title_sort methodological quality analysis of systematic review for the treatment of rotator cuff disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710334
work_keys_str_mv AT estevamjhonydealmeida methodologicalqualityanalysisofsystematicreviewforthetreatmentofrotatorcuffdisease
AT francoeduardosignorinibicas methodologicalqualityanalysisofsystematicreviewforthetreatmentofrotatorcuffdisease
AT kriebelcarolinafalconi methodologicalqualityanalysisofsystematicreviewforthetreatmentofrotatorcuffdisease
AT peccinmariastella methodologicalqualityanalysisofsystematicreviewforthetreatmentofrotatorcuffdisease