Cargando…

Measuring Acetabular Version after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Two Radiographic Methods

Objective  The objective of the present work was to compare the measurement of acetabular component version on anteroposterior (AP) and on cross-table radiographs after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods  Radiographs of 60 hips with a primary THA were selected. Version was calculated on the AP ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cardoso, Afonso, Duarte, Mafalda, Viegas, Rui, Oliveira, Filipe, Pinto, Pedro, Rego, Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721360
Descripción
Sumario:Objective  The objective of the present work was to compare the measurement of acetabular component version on anteroposterior (AP) and on cross-table radiographs after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods  Radiographs of 60 hips with a primary THA were selected. Version was calculated on the AP radiograph using the Lewinnek method and, on the cross-table, using the Woo and Morrey direct method. Results  Mean and standard deviation (SD) were different on both radiographs, being 9.7° ± 5.5° on the AP, whereas in the cross-table the measurements were 20.6° ± 8.4° ( p  < 0.001). Minding our aim of 10°, the cross-table measurements were statistically different from it ( p  < 0.001), while the AP measurement did not differ ( p  = 0.716). Conclusion  The present study showed that the best way to correctly evaluate the acetabular component positioning following a THA is by measuring anteversion and abduction on an AP radiograph after confirming, in a cross-table radiograph, that the component is not retroverted.