Cargando…
Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database
Introduction Cranioplasty is performed by placing an artificial plate in place of a patient's native skull bones to repair post-craniectomy defects after trauma. Implanted materials can range from titanium to synthetic polyether derivatives and are produced by multiple manufacturers. There are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513401 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16795 |
_version_ | 1783746322581422080 |
---|---|
author | Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft Patel, Neal A Jones, Keri Ruh, Nikki B Gendreau, Julian L Abraham, Mickey E Mammis, Antonios |
author_facet | Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft Patel, Neal A Jones, Keri Ruh, Nikki B Gendreau, Julian L Abraham, Mickey E Mammis, Antonios |
author_sort | Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Cranioplasty is performed by placing an artificial plate in place of a patient's native skull bones to repair post-craniectomy defects after trauma. Implanted materials can range from titanium to synthetic polyether derivatives and are produced by multiple manufacturers. There are few studies characterizing complications associated with these cranioplasty plates to date. We aimed to quantify and categorize complications of these devices using a national federal database. Methods The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for all entries reported under the category "plate, cranioplasty, preformed, non-alterable" with the additional product code GXN between the time range from September 1, 2010, to September 1, 2020. After data extraction, each of the entries was screened for duplicates and tabulated into different categories of complications. Additionally, product information such as the plate manufacturer was extracted from each entry. Results The search yielded 329 unique event reports. The most frequent complications were infection (39%), followed by incorrectly fitting implants (30%) and implant breaks (6%). Other major complications included cerebrospinal fluid leakage and cerebral edema (5%), wound dehiscence (5%), and migration of hardware (3%). The brands associated with the most entries in the database were the Synthes (DePuy Synthes Companies, Massachusetts, United States) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants (PSI) (57%), the Biomet (Zimmer Biome, Indiana, United States) hard tissue replacement-polyetherketoneketone (HTR-PEKK) patient-matched implant (PMI) (23%), and the AccuShape PEEK PSI (MedCAD, Dallas, USA) (5%). Conclusions Infection and improperly fitting implants appear to be the two most frequent complications of cranioplasty plates. The goals of future research should include the prevention of plate infections as well as improving techniques to custom-fit implantable devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8405381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84053812021-09-09 Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft Patel, Neal A Jones, Keri Ruh, Nikki B Gendreau, Julian L Abraham, Mickey E Mammis, Antonios Cureus Neurology Introduction Cranioplasty is performed by placing an artificial plate in place of a patient's native skull bones to repair post-craniectomy defects after trauma. Implanted materials can range from titanium to synthetic polyether derivatives and are produced by multiple manufacturers. There are few studies characterizing complications associated with these cranioplasty plates to date. We aimed to quantify and categorize complications of these devices using a national federal database. Methods The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for all entries reported under the category "plate, cranioplasty, preformed, non-alterable" with the additional product code GXN between the time range from September 1, 2010, to September 1, 2020. After data extraction, each of the entries was screened for duplicates and tabulated into different categories of complications. Additionally, product information such as the plate manufacturer was extracted from each entry. Results The search yielded 329 unique event reports. The most frequent complications were infection (39%), followed by incorrectly fitting implants (30%) and implant breaks (6%). Other major complications included cerebrospinal fluid leakage and cerebral edema (5%), wound dehiscence (5%), and migration of hardware (3%). The brands associated with the most entries in the database were the Synthes (DePuy Synthes Companies, Massachusetts, United States) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants (PSI) (57%), the Biomet (Zimmer Biome, Indiana, United States) hard tissue replacement-polyetherketoneketone (HTR-PEKK) patient-matched implant (PMI) (23%), and the AccuShape PEEK PSI (MedCAD, Dallas, USA) (5%). Conclusions Infection and improperly fitting implants appear to be the two most frequent complications of cranioplasty plates. The goals of future research should include the prevention of plate infections as well as improving techniques to custom-fit implantable devices. Cureus 2021-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8405381/ /pubmed/34513401 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16795 Text en Copyright © 2021, Hacherl et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft Patel, Neal A Jones, Keri Ruh, Nikki B Gendreau, Julian L Abraham, Mickey E Mammis, Antonios Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database |
title | Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database |
title_full | Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database |
title_fullStr | Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database |
title_short | Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database |
title_sort | characterizing adverse events of cranioplasty implants after craniectomy: a retrospective review of the federal manufacturer and user facility device experience database |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513401 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16795 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hacherlcaitlincraft characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase AT patelneala characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase AT joneskeri characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase AT ruhnikkib characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase AT gendreaujulianl characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase AT abrahammickeye characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase AT mammisantonios characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase |