Cargando…

Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database

Introduction Cranioplasty is performed by placing an artificial plate in place of a patient's native skull bones to repair post-craniectomy defects after trauma. Implanted materials can range from titanium to synthetic polyether derivatives and are produced by multiple manufacturers. There are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft, Patel, Neal A, Jones, Keri, Ruh, Nikki B, Gendreau, Julian L, Abraham, Mickey E, Mammis, Antonios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513401
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16795
_version_ 1783746322581422080
author Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft
Patel, Neal A
Jones, Keri
Ruh, Nikki B
Gendreau, Julian L
Abraham, Mickey E
Mammis, Antonios
author_facet Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft
Patel, Neal A
Jones, Keri
Ruh, Nikki B
Gendreau, Julian L
Abraham, Mickey E
Mammis, Antonios
author_sort Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft
collection PubMed
description Introduction Cranioplasty is performed by placing an artificial plate in place of a patient's native skull bones to repair post-craniectomy defects after trauma. Implanted materials can range from titanium to synthetic polyether derivatives and are produced by multiple manufacturers. There are few studies characterizing complications associated with these cranioplasty plates to date. We aimed to quantify and categorize complications of these devices using a national federal database. Methods The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for all entries reported under the category "plate, cranioplasty, preformed, non-alterable" with the additional product code GXN between the time range from September 1, 2010, to September 1, 2020. After data extraction, each of the entries was screened for duplicates and tabulated into different categories of complications. Additionally, product information such as the plate manufacturer was extracted from each entry. Results The search yielded 329 unique event reports. The most frequent complications were infection (39%), followed by incorrectly fitting implants (30%) and implant breaks (6%). Other major complications included cerebrospinal fluid leakage and cerebral edema (5%), wound dehiscence (5%), and migration of hardware (3%). The brands associated with the most entries in the database were the Synthes (DePuy Synthes Companies, Massachusetts, United States) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants (PSI) (57%), the Biomet (Zimmer Biome, Indiana, United States) hard tissue replacement-polyetherketoneketone (HTR-PEKK) patient-matched implant (PMI) (23%), and the AccuShape PEEK PSI (MedCAD, Dallas, USA) (5%). Conclusions Infection and improperly fitting implants appear to be the two most frequent complications of cranioplasty plates. The goals of future research should include the prevention of plate infections as well as improving techniques to custom-fit implantable devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8405381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84053812021-09-09 Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft Patel, Neal A Jones, Keri Ruh, Nikki B Gendreau, Julian L Abraham, Mickey E Mammis, Antonios Cureus Neurology Introduction Cranioplasty is performed by placing an artificial plate in place of a patient's native skull bones to repair post-craniectomy defects after trauma. Implanted materials can range from titanium to synthetic polyether derivatives and are produced by multiple manufacturers. There are few studies characterizing complications associated with these cranioplasty plates to date. We aimed to quantify and categorize complications of these devices using a national federal database. Methods The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for all entries reported under the category "plate, cranioplasty, preformed, non-alterable" with the additional product code GXN between the time range from September 1, 2010, to September 1, 2020. After data extraction, each of the entries was screened for duplicates and tabulated into different categories of complications. Additionally, product information such as the plate manufacturer was extracted from each entry. Results The search yielded 329 unique event reports. The most frequent complications were infection (39%), followed by incorrectly fitting implants (30%) and implant breaks (6%). Other major complications included cerebrospinal fluid leakage and cerebral edema (5%), wound dehiscence (5%), and migration of hardware (3%). The brands associated with the most entries in the database were the Synthes (DePuy Synthes Companies, Massachusetts, United States) polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific implants (PSI) (57%), the Biomet (Zimmer Biome, Indiana, United States) hard tissue replacement-polyetherketoneketone (HTR-PEKK) patient-matched implant (PMI) (23%), and the AccuShape PEEK PSI (MedCAD, Dallas, USA) (5%). Conclusions Infection and improperly fitting implants appear to be the two most frequent complications of cranioplasty plates. The goals of future research should include the prevention of plate infections as well as improving techniques to custom-fit implantable devices. Cureus 2021-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8405381/ /pubmed/34513401 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16795 Text en Copyright © 2021, Hacherl et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurology
Hacherl, Caitlin-Craft
Patel, Neal A
Jones, Keri
Ruh, Nikki B
Gendreau, Julian L
Abraham, Mickey E
Mammis, Antonios
Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database
title Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database
title_full Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database
title_fullStr Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database
title_short Characterizing Adverse Events of Cranioplasty Implants After Craniectomy: A Retrospective Review of the Federal Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database
title_sort characterizing adverse events of cranioplasty implants after craniectomy: a retrospective review of the federal manufacturer and user facility device experience database
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513401
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16795
work_keys_str_mv AT hacherlcaitlincraft characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase
AT patelneala characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase
AT joneskeri characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase
AT ruhnikkib characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase
AT gendreaujulianl characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase
AT abrahammickeye characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase
AT mammisantonios characterizingadverseeventsofcranioplastyimplantsaftercraniectomyaretrospectivereviewofthefederalmanufactureranduserfacilitydeviceexperiencedatabase