Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital
Purpose: To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 Antigen kit (GenBody Inc., Cheonan, South Korea) available in the market with the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SAR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513392 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16785 |
_version_ | 1783746329944522752 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Arpana Gupta, Pratima Mathuria, Yogendra P Kalita, Deepjyoti Prasad, Amber Panda, Prasan K Bahurupi, Yogesh Sahoo, Biswajeet Omar, Balram Ji |
author_facet | Singh, Arpana Gupta, Pratima Mathuria, Yogendra P Kalita, Deepjyoti Prasad, Amber Panda, Prasan K Bahurupi, Yogesh Sahoo, Biswajeet Omar, Balram Ji |
author_sort | Singh, Arpana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 Antigen kit (GenBody Inc., Cheonan, South Korea) available in the market with the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methods: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and tested by RT-PCR and GenBody Rapid antigen kit. Performance characteristic of the antigen kit was calculated. Results: We tested nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs (n=240). Amongst the 102 positive RT-PCR samples, the rapid antigen test detected 36 as positive, showing an overall sensitivity of 35.3%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also detected positive by RT-PCR. Conclusion: The performance of the rapid antigen kit was good with respect to high viral load samples, whereas those with lower levels were missed. Unfortunately, the overall low sensitivity of the antigen kit does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing kit for COVID-19 diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8405413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84054132021-09-09 Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital Singh, Arpana Gupta, Pratima Mathuria, Yogendra P Kalita, Deepjyoti Prasad, Amber Panda, Prasan K Bahurupi, Yogesh Sahoo, Biswajeet Omar, Balram Ji Cureus Infectious Disease Purpose: To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 Antigen kit (GenBody Inc., Cheonan, South Korea) available in the market with the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methods: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and tested by RT-PCR and GenBody Rapid antigen kit. Performance characteristic of the antigen kit was calculated. Results: We tested nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs (n=240). Amongst the 102 positive RT-PCR samples, the rapid antigen test detected 36 as positive, showing an overall sensitivity of 35.3%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also detected positive by RT-PCR. Conclusion: The performance of the rapid antigen kit was good with respect to high viral load samples, whereas those with lower levels were missed. Unfortunately, the overall low sensitivity of the antigen kit does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing kit for COVID-19 diagnosis. Cureus 2021-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8405413/ /pubmed/34513392 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16785 Text en Copyright © 2021, Singh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Infectious Disease Singh, Arpana Gupta, Pratima Mathuria, Yogendra P Kalita, Deepjyoti Prasad, Amber Panda, Prasan K Bahurupi, Yogesh Sahoo, Biswajeet Omar, Balram Ji Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab based rapid sars-cov-2 antigen detection and real-time rt-pcr for diagnosis of covid-19 in tertiary care hospital |
topic | Infectious Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513392 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singharpana comparativeevaluationofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabbasedrapidsarscov2antigendetectionandrealtimertpcrfordiagnosisofcovid19intertiarycarehospital AT guptapratima comparativeevaluationofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabbasedrapidsarscov2antigendetectionandrealtimertpcrfordiagnosisofcovid19intertiarycarehospital AT mathuriayogendrap comparativeevaluationofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabbasedrapidsarscov2antigendetectionandrealtimertpcrfordiagnosisofcovid19intertiarycarehospital AT kalitadeepjyoti comparativeevaluationofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabbasedrapidsarscov2antigendetectionandrealtimertpcrfordiagnosisofcovid19intertiarycarehospital AT prasadamber comparativeevaluationofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabbasedrapidsarscov2antigendetectionandrealtimertpcrfordiagnosisofcovid19intertiarycarehospital AT pandaprasank comparativeevaluationofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabbasedrapidsarscov2antigendetectionandrealtimertpcrfordiagnosisofcovid19intertiarycarehospital AT bahurupiyogesh comparativeevaluationofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabbasedrapidsarscov2antigendetectionandrealtimertpcrfordiagnosisofcovid19intertiarycarehospital AT sahoobiswajeet comparativeevaluationofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabbasedrapidsarscov2antigendetectionandrealtimertpcrfordiagnosisofcovid19intertiarycarehospital AT omarbalramji comparativeevaluationofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabbasedrapidsarscov2antigendetectionandrealtimertpcrfordiagnosisofcovid19intertiarycarehospital |