Cargando…

Impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) patients

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic response to successful extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is not uniform. Pulse pressure (PP) as a correlate for myocardial damage or recovery from it, might be a valuable tool to estimate the outcome of these patients. METHODS: We report retrospective data o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rilinger, Jonathan, Riefler, Antonia M., Bemtgen, Xavier, Jäckel, Markus, Zotzmann, Viviane, Biever, Paul M., Duerschmied, Daniel, Benk, Christoph, Trummer, Georg, Kaier, Klaus, Bode, Christoph, Staudacher, Dawid L., Wengenmayer, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33779810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01838-7
_version_ 1783746340291870720
author Rilinger, Jonathan
Riefler, Antonia M.
Bemtgen, Xavier
Jäckel, Markus
Zotzmann, Viviane
Biever, Paul M.
Duerschmied, Daniel
Benk, Christoph
Trummer, Georg
Kaier, Klaus
Bode, Christoph
Staudacher, Dawid L.
Wengenmayer, Tobias
author_facet Rilinger, Jonathan
Riefler, Antonia M.
Bemtgen, Xavier
Jäckel, Markus
Zotzmann, Viviane
Biever, Paul M.
Duerschmied, Daniel
Benk, Christoph
Trummer, Georg
Kaier, Klaus
Bode, Christoph
Staudacher, Dawid L.
Wengenmayer, Tobias
author_sort Rilinger, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic response to successful extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is not uniform. Pulse pressure (PP) as a correlate for myocardial damage or recovery from it, might be a valuable tool to estimate the outcome of these patients. METHODS: We report retrospective data of a single-centre registry of eCPR patients, treated at the Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care Unit at the Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Germany, between 01/2017 and 01/2020. The association between PP of the first 10 days after eCPR and hospital survival was investigated. Moreover, patients were divided into three groups according to their PP [low (0–9 mmHg), mid (10–29 mmHg) and high (≥ 30 mmHg)] at each time point. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients (age 63 years, 74.1% male, 40% OHCA, average low flow time 49 min) were analysed. Overall hospital survival rate was 28%. A low PP both early after eCPR (after 1, 3, 6 and 12 h) and after day 1 to day 8 was associated with reduced hospital survival. At each time point (1 h to day 5) the classification of patients into a low, mid and high PP group was able to categorize the patients for a low (5–20%), moderate (20–40%) and high (50–70%) survival rate. A multivariable analysis showed that the mean PP of the first 24 h was an independent predictor for survival (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In this analysis, PP occurred to be a valuable parameter to estimate survival and maybe support clinical decision making in the further course of patients after eCPR. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-021-01838-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8405467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84054672021-09-09 Impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) patients Rilinger, Jonathan Riefler, Antonia M. Bemtgen, Xavier Jäckel, Markus Zotzmann, Viviane Biever, Paul M. Duerschmied, Daniel Benk, Christoph Trummer, Georg Kaier, Klaus Bode, Christoph Staudacher, Dawid L. Wengenmayer, Tobias Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic response to successful extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is not uniform. Pulse pressure (PP) as a correlate for myocardial damage or recovery from it, might be a valuable tool to estimate the outcome of these patients. METHODS: We report retrospective data of a single-centre registry of eCPR patients, treated at the Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care Unit at the Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Germany, between 01/2017 and 01/2020. The association between PP of the first 10 days after eCPR and hospital survival was investigated. Moreover, patients were divided into three groups according to their PP [low (0–9 mmHg), mid (10–29 mmHg) and high (≥ 30 mmHg)] at each time point. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients (age 63 years, 74.1% male, 40% OHCA, average low flow time 49 min) were analysed. Overall hospital survival rate was 28%. A low PP both early after eCPR (after 1, 3, 6 and 12 h) and after day 1 to day 8 was associated with reduced hospital survival. At each time point (1 h to day 5) the classification of patients into a low, mid and high PP group was able to categorize the patients for a low (5–20%), moderate (20–40%) and high (50–70%) survival rate. A multivariable analysis showed that the mean PP of the first 24 h was an independent predictor for survival (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In this analysis, PP occurred to be a valuable parameter to estimate survival and maybe support clinical decision making in the further course of patients after eCPR. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-021-01838-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8405467/ /pubmed/33779810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01838-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rilinger, Jonathan
Riefler, Antonia M.
Bemtgen, Xavier
Jäckel, Markus
Zotzmann, Viviane
Biever, Paul M.
Duerschmied, Daniel
Benk, Christoph
Trummer, Georg
Kaier, Klaus
Bode, Christoph
Staudacher, Dawid L.
Wengenmayer, Tobias
Impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) patients
title Impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) patients
title_full Impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) patients
title_fullStr Impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) patients
title_full_unstemmed Impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) patients
title_short Impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) patients
title_sort impact of pulse pressure on clinical outcome in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ecpr) patients
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33779810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01838-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rilingerjonathan impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT rieflerantoniam impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT bemtgenxavier impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT jackelmarkus impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT zotzmannviviane impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT bieverpaulm impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT duerschmieddaniel impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT benkchristoph impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT trummergeorg impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT kaierklaus impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT bodechristoph impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT staudacherdawidl impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients
AT wengenmayertobias impactofpulsepressureonclinicaloutcomeinextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationecprpatients