Cargando…

Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

Multiple new recommendations have been introduced in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Most recommendations are supported by high-quality scientif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giannitsis, Evangelos, Blankenberg, Stefan, Christenson, Robert H., Frey, Norbert, von Haehling, Stephan, Hamm, Christian W., Inoue, Kenji, Katus, Hugo A., Lee, Chien-Chang, McCord, James, Möckel, Martin, Chieh, Jack Tan Wei, Tubaro, Marco, Wollert, Kai C., Huber, Kurt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33635437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01821-2
_version_ 1783746342443548672
author Giannitsis, Evangelos
Blankenberg, Stefan
Christenson, Robert H.
Frey, Norbert
von Haehling, Stephan
Hamm, Christian W.
Inoue, Kenji
Katus, Hugo A.
Lee, Chien-Chang
McCord, James
Möckel, Martin
Chieh, Jack Tan Wei
Tubaro, Marco
Wollert, Kai C.
Huber, Kurt
author_facet Giannitsis, Evangelos
Blankenberg, Stefan
Christenson, Robert H.
Frey, Norbert
von Haehling, Stephan
Hamm, Christian W.
Inoue, Kenji
Katus, Hugo A.
Lee, Chien-Chang
McCord, James
Möckel, Martin
Chieh, Jack Tan Wei
Tubaro, Marco
Wollert, Kai C.
Huber, Kurt
author_sort Giannitsis, Evangelos
collection PubMed
description Multiple new recommendations have been introduced in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Most recommendations are supported by high-quality scientific evidence. The guidelines provide solutions to overcome obstacles presumed to complicate a convenient interpretation of troponin results such as age-, or sex-specific cutoffs, and to give practical advice to overcome delays of laboratory reporting. However, in some areas, scientific support is less well documented or even missing, and other areas are covered rather by expert opinion or subjective recommendations. We aim to provide a critical appraisal on several recommendations, mainly related to the diagnostic and prognostic assessment, highlighting the discrepancies between Guideline recommendations and the existing scientific evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8405476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84054762021-09-09 Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome Giannitsis, Evangelos Blankenberg, Stefan Christenson, Robert H. Frey, Norbert von Haehling, Stephan Hamm, Christian W. Inoue, Kenji Katus, Hugo A. Lee, Chien-Chang McCord, James Möckel, Martin Chieh, Jack Tan Wei Tubaro, Marco Wollert, Kai C. Huber, Kurt Clin Res Cardiol Critical Perspective Multiple new recommendations have been introduced in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Most recommendations are supported by high-quality scientific evidence. The guidelines provide solutions to overcome obstacles presumed to complicate a convenient interpretation of troponin results such as age-, or sex-specific cutoffs, and to give practical advice to overcome delays of laboratory reporting. However, in some areas, scientific support is less well documented or even missing, and other areas are covered rather by expert opinion or subjective recommendations. We aim to provide a critical appraisal on several recommendations, mainly related to the diagnostic and prognostic assessment, highlighting the discrepancies between Guideline recommendations and the existing scientific evidence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8405476/ /pubmed/33635437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01821-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Critical Perspective
Giannitsis, Evangelos
Blankenberg, Stefan
Christenson, Robert H.
Frey, Norbert
von Haehling, Stephan
Hamm, Christian W.
Inoue, Kenji
Katus, Hugo A.
Lee, Chien-Chang
McCord, James
Möckel, Martin
Chieh, Jack Tan Wei
Tubaro, Marco
Wollert, Kai C.
Huber, Kurt
Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
title Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_full Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_fullStr Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_short Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_sort critical appraisal of the 2020 esc guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
topic Critical Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33635437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01821-2
work_keys_str_mv AT giannitsisevangelos criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT blankenbergstefan criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT christensonroberth criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT freynorbert criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT vonhaehlingstephan criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT hammchristianw criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT inouekenji criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT katushugoa criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT leechienchang criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT mccordjames criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT mockelmartin criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT chiehjacktanwei criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT tubaromarco criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT wollertkaic criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT huberkurt criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome