Cargando…
Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
Multiple new recommendations have been introduced in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Most recommendations are supported by high-quality scientif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33635437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01821-2 |
_version_ | 1783746342443548672 |
---|---|
author | Giannitsis, Evangelos Blankenberg, Stefan Christenson, Robert H. Frey, Norbert von Haehling, Stephan Hamm, Christian W. Inoue, Kenji Katus, Hugo A. Lee, Chien-Chang McCord, James Möckel, Martin Chieh, Jack Tan Wei Tubaro, Marco Wollert, Kai C. Huber, Kurt |
author_facet | Giannitsis, Evangelos Blankenberg, Stefan Christenson, Robert H. Frey, Norbert von Haehling, Stephan Hamm, Christian W. Inoue, Kenji Katus, Hugo A. Lee, Chien-Chang McCord, James Möckel, Martin Chieh, Jack Tan Wei Tubaro, Marco Wollert, Kai C. Huber, Kurt |
author_sort | Giannitsis, Evangelos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple new recommendations have been introduced in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Most recommendations are supported by high-quality scientific evidence. The guidelines provide solutions to overcome obstacles presumed to complicate a convenient interpretation of troponin results such as age-, or sex-specific cutoffs, and to give practical advice to overcome delays of laboratory reporting. However, in some areas, scientific support is less well documented or even missing, and other areas are covered rather by expert opinion or subjective recommendations. We aim to provide a critical appraisal on several recommendations, mainly related to the diagnostic and prognostic assessment, highlighting the discrepancies between Guideline recommendations and the existing scientific evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8405476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84054762021-09-09 Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome Giannitsis, Evangelos Blankenberg, Stefan Christenson, Robert H. Frey, Norbert von Haehling, Stephan Hamm, Christian W. Inoue, Kenji Katus, Hugo A. Lee, Chien-Chang McCord, James Möckel, Martin Chieh, Jack Tan Wei Tubaro, Marco Wollert, Kai C. Huber, Kurt Clin Res Cardiol Critical Perspective Multiple new recommendations have been introduced in the 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Most recommendations are supported by high-quality scientific evidence. The guidelines provide solutions to overcome obstacles presumed to complicate a convenient interpretation of troponin results such as age-, or sex-specific cutoffs, and to give practical advice to overcome delays of laboratory reporting. However, in some areas, scientific support is less well documented or even missing, and other areas are covered rather by expert opinion or subjective recommendations. We aim to provide a critical appraisal on several recommendations, mainly related to the diagnostic and prognostic assessment, highlighting the discrepancies between Guideline recommendations and the existing scientific evidence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8405476/ /pubmed/33635437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01821-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Critical Perspective Giannitsis, Evangelos Blankenberg, Stefan Christenson, Robert H. Frey, Norbert von Haehling, Stephan Hamm, Christian W. Inoue, Kenji Katus, Hugo A. Lee, Chien-Chang McCord, James Möckel, Martin Chieh, Jack Tan Wei Tubaro, Marco Wollert, Kai C. Huber, Kurt Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title | Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_full | Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_fullStr | Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_short | Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_sort | critical appraisal of the 2020 esc guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome |
topic | Critical Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33635437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01821-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giannitsisevangelos criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT blankenbergstefan criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT christensonroberth criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT freynorbert criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT vonhaehlingstephan criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT hammchristianw criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT inouekenji criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT katushugoa criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT leechienchang criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT mccordjames criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT mockelmartin criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT chiehjacktanwei criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT tubaromarco criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT wollertkaic criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT huberkurt criticalappraisalofthe2020escguidelinerecommendationsondiagnosisandriskassessmentinpatientswithsuspectednonstsegmentelevationacutecoronarysyndrome |