Cargando…
Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8 |
_version_ | 1783746351020900352 |
---|---|
author | Wohlleber, Kerstin Heger, Patrick Probst, Pascal Engel, Christoph Diener, Markus K. Mihaljevic, André L. |
author_facet | Wohlleber, Kerstin Heger, Patrick Probst, Pascal Engel, Christoph Diener, Markus K. Mihaljevic, André L. |
author_sort | Wohlleber, Kerstin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options in respect to HRQoL are sparse. The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis was, therefore, to identify all available HRQoL tools regarding primary liver cancer, to assess the methodological quality of these HRQoL instruments and to compare surgical, interventional and medical treatments with regard to HRQoL. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE. The methodological quality of all identified HRQoL instruments was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) standard. Consequently, the quality of reporting of HRQoL data was assessed. Finally, wherever possible HRQoL data were extracted and quantitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 124 studies using 29 different HRQoL instruments were identified. After the methodological assessment, only 10 instruments fulfilled the psychometric criteria and could be included in subsequent analyses. However, quality of reporting of HRQoL data was insufficient, precluding meta-analyses for 9 instruments. CONCLUSION: Using a standardized methodological assessment, specific HRQoL instruments are recommended for use in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. HRQoL data of patients undergoing treatment of primary liver cancers are sparse and reporting falls short of published standards. Meaningful comparison of established treatment options with regard to HRQoL was impossible indicating the need for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8405513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84055132021-09-09 Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies Wohlleber, Kerstin Heger, Patrick Probst, Pascal Engel, Christoph Diener, Markus K. Mihaljevic, André L. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options in respect to HRQoL are sparse. The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis was, therefore, to identify all available HRQoL tools regarding primary liver cancer, to assess the methodological quality of these HRQoL instruments and to compare surgical, interventional and medical treatments with regard to HRQoL. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE. The methodological quality of all identified HRQoL instruments was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) standard. Consequently, the quality of reporting of HRQoL data was assessed. Finally, wherever possible HRQoL data were extracted and quantitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 124 studies using 29 different HRQoL instruments were identified. After the methodological assessment, only 10 instruments fulfilled the psychometric criteria and could be included in subsequent analyses. However, quality of reporting of HRQoL data was insufficient, precluding meta-analyses for 9 instruments. CONCLUSION: Using a standardized methodological assessment, specific HRQoL instruments are recommended for use in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. HRQoL data of patients undergoing treatment of primary liver cancers are sparse and reporting falls short of published standards. Meaningful comparison of established treatment options with regard to HRQoL was impossible indicating the need for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8405513/ /pubmed/34283381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wohlleber, Kerstin Heger, Patrick Probst, Pascal Engel, Christoph Diener, Markus K. Mihaljevic, André L. Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies |
title | Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies |
title_full | Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies |
title_fullStr | Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies |
title_short | Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies |
title_sort | health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wohlleberkerstin healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies AT hegerpatrick healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies AT probstpascal healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies AT engelchristoph healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies AT dienermarkusk healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies AT mihaljevicandrel healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies |