Cargando…

Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wohlleber, Kerstin, Heger, Patrick, Probst, Pascal, Engel, Christoph, Diener, Markus K., Mihaljevic, André L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8
_version_ 1783746351020900352
author Wohlleber, Kerstin
Heger, Patrick
Probst, Pascal
Engel, Christoph
Diener, Markus K.
Mihaljevic, André L.
author_facet Wohlleber, Kerstin
Heger, Patrick
Probst, Pascal
Engel, Christoph
Diener, Markus K.
Mihaljevic, André L.
author_sort Wohlleber, Kerstin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options in respect to HRQoL are sparse. The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis was, therefore, to identify all available HRQoL tools regarding primary liver cancer, to assess the methodological quality of these HRQoL instruments and to compare surgical, interventional and medical treatments with regard to HRQoL. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE. The methodological quality of all identified HRQoL instruments was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) standard. Consequently, the quality of reporting of HRQoL data was assessed. Finally, wherever possible HRQoL data were extracted and quantitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 124 studies using 29 different HRQoL instruments were identified. After the methodological assessment, only 10 instruments fulfilled the psychometric criteria and could be included in subsequent analyses. However, quality of reporting of HRQoL data was insufficient, precluding meta-analyses for 9 instruments. CONCLUSION: Using a standardized methodological assessment, specific HRQoL instruments are recommended for use in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. HRQoL data of patients undergoing treatment of primary liver cancers are sparse and reporting falls short of published standards. Meaningful comparison of established treatment options with regard to HRQoL was impossible indicating the need for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8405513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84055132021-09-09 Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies Wohlleber, Kerstin Heger, Patrick Probst, Pascal Engel, Christoph Diener, Markus K. Mihaljevic, André L. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options in respect to HRQoL are sparse. The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis was, therefore, to identify all available HRQoL tools regarding primary liver cancer, to assess the methodological quality of these HRQoL instruments and to compare surgical, interventional and medical treatments with regard to HRQoL. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE. The methodological quality of all identified HRQoL instruments was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) standard. Consequently, the quality of reporting of HRQoL data was assessed. Finally, wherever possible HRQoL data were extracted and quantitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 124 studies using 29 different HRQoL instruments were identified. After the methodological assessment, only 10 instruments fulfilled the psychometric criteria and could be included in subsequent analyses. However, quality of reporting of HRQoL data was insufficient, precluding meta-analyses for 9 instruments. CONCLUSION: Using a standardized methodological assessment, specific HRQoL instruments are recommended for use in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. HRQoL data of patients undergoing treatment of primary liver cancers are sparse and reporting falls short of published standards. Meaningful comparison of established treatment options with regard to HRQoL was impossible indicating the need for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8405513/ /pubmed/34283381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wohlleber, Kerstin
Heger, Patrick
Probst, Pascal
Engel, Christoph
Diener, Markus K.
Mihaljevic, André L.
Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies
title Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies
title_full Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies
title_fullStr Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies
title_full_unstemmed Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies
title_short Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies
title_sort health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8405513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34283381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wohlleberkerstin healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies
AT hegerpatrick healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies
AT probstpascal healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies
AT engelchristoph healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies
AT dienermarkusk healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies
AT mihaljevicandrel healthrelatedqualityoflifeinprimaryhepaticcancerasystematicreviewassessingthemethodologicalpropertiesofinstrumentsandametaanalysiscomparingtreatmentstrategies