Cargando…

Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?

Regulatory RNAs have emerged as ubiquitous gene regulators in all bacterial species studied to date. The combination of sequence-specific RNA interactions and malleable RNA structure has allowed regulatory RNA to adopt different mechanisms of gene regulation in a diversity of genetic backgrounds. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mediati, Daniel G., Lalaouna, David, Tree, Jai J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8406224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01041-21
_version_ 1783746479564783616
author Mediati, Daniel G.
Lalaouna, David
Tree, Jai J.
author_facet Mediati, Daniel G.
Lalaouna, David
Tree, Jai J.
author_sort Mediati, Daniel G.
collection PubMed
description Regulatory RNAs have emerged as ubiquitous gene regulators in all bacterial species studied to date. The combination of sequence-specific RNA interactions and malleable RNA structure has allowed regulatory RNA to adopt different mechanisms of gene regulation in a diversity of genetic backgrounds. In the model Gammaproteobacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella, the regulatory RNA chaperone Hfq appears to play a global role in gene regulation, directly controlling ∼20 to 25% of the entire transcriptome. While the model Firmicutes Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus encode a Hfq homologue, its role has been significantly depreciated. These bacteria also have marked differences in RNA turnover. E. coli and Salmonella degrade RNA through internal endonucleolytic and 3′→5′ exonucleolytic cleavage that appears to allow transient accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR cleavage fragments that contain stabilizing 3′ structures. In contrast, B. subtilis and S. aureus are able to exonucleolytically attack internally cleaved RNA from both the 5′ and 3′ ends, efficiently degrading mRNA 3′ UTR fragments. Here, we propose that the lack of 5′→3′ exoribonuclease activity in Gammaproteobacteria has allowed the accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR ends as the “default” setting. This in turn may have provided a larger pool of unconstrained RNA sequences that has fueled the expansion of Hfq function and small RNA (sRNA) regulation in E. coli and Salmonella. Conversely, the exoribonuclease RNase J may be a significant barrier to the evolution of 3′ UTR sRNAs in B. subtilis and S. aureus that has limited the pool of RNA ligands available to Hfq and other sRNA chaperones, depreciating their function in these model Firmicutes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8406224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84062242021-09-09 Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria? Mediati, Daniel G. Lalaouna, David Tree, Jai J. mBio Opinion/Hypothesis Regulatory RNAs have emerged as ubiquitous gene regulators in all bacterial species studied to date. The combination of sequence-specific RNA interactions and malleable RNA structure has allowed regulatory RNA to adopt different mechanisms of gene regulation in a diversity of genetic backgrounds. In the model Gammaproteobacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella, the regulatory RNA chaperone Hfq appears to play a global role in gene regulation, directly controlling ∼20 to 25% of the entire transcriptome. While the model Firmicutes Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus encode a Hfq homologue, its role has been significantly depreciated. These bacteria also have marked differences in RNA turnover. E. coli and Salmonella degrade RNA through internal endonucleolytic and 3′→5′ exonucleolytic cleavage that appears to allow transient accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR cleavage fragments that contain stabilizing 3′ structures. In contrast, B. subtilis and S. aureus are able to exonucleolytically attack internally cleaved RNA from both the 5′ and 3′ ends, efficiently degrading mRNA 3′ UTR fragments. Here, we propose that the lack of 5′→3′ exoribonuclease activity in Gammaproteobacteria has allowed the accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR ends as the “default” setting. This in turn may have provided a larger pool of unconstrained RNA sequences that has fueled the expansion of Hfq function and small RNA (sRNA) regulation in E. coli and Salmonella. Conversely, the exoribonuclease RNase J may be a significant barrier to the evolution of 3′ UTR sRNAs in B. subtilis and S. aureus that has limited the pool of RNA ligands available to Hfq and other sRNA chaperones, depreciating their function in these model Firmicutes. American Society for Microbiology 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8406224/ /pubmed/34372700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01041-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mediati et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Opinion/Hypothesis
Mediati, Daniel G.
Lalaouna, David
Tree, Jai J.
Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_full Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_fullStr Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_full_unstemmed Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_short Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_sort burning the candle at both ends: have exoribonucleases driven divergence of regulatory rna mechanisms in bacteria?
topic Opinion/Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8406224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34372700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01041-21
work_keys_str_mv AT mediatidanielg burningthecandleatbothendshaveexoribonucleasesdrivendivergenceofregulatoryrnamechanismsinbacteria
AT lalaounadavid burningthecandleatbothendshaveexoribonucleasesdrivendivergenceofregulatoryrnamechanismsinbacteria
AT treejaij burningthecandleatbothendshaveexoribonucleasesdrivendivergenceofregulatoryrnamechanismsinbacteria