Cargando…
Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In recent years, many studies focused on the use of robotic devices for both the assessment and the neuro-motor reeducation of upper limb in subjects after stroke, spinal cord injuries or affected by neurological disorders. Contrarily, it is still hard to find examples of robot-aided ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8406564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34465356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00925-0 |
_version_ | 1783746526798938112 |
---|---|
author | Albanese, Giulia Aurora Taglione, Elisa Gasparini, Cecilia Grandi, Sara Pettinelli, Foebe Sardelli, Claudio Catitti, Paolo Sandini, Giulio Masia, Lorenzo Zenzeri, Jacopo |
author_facet | Albanese, Giulia Aurora Taglione, Elisa Gasparini, Cecilia Grandi, Sara Pettinelli, Foebe Sardelli, Claudio Catitti, Paolo Sandini, Giulio Masia, Lorenzo Zenzeri, Jacopo |
author_sort | Albanese, Giulia Aurora |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In recent years, many studies focused on the use of robotic devices for both the assessment and the neuro-motor reeducation of upper limb in subjects after stroke, spinal cord injuries or affected by neurological disorders. Contrarily, it is still hard to find examples of robot-aided assessment and rehabilitation after traumatic injuries in the orthopedic field. However, those benefits related to the use of robotic devices are expected also in orthopedic functional reeducation. METHODS: After a wrist injury occurred at their workplace, wrist functionality of twenty-three subjects was evaluated through a robot-based assessment and clinical measures (Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation, Jebsen-Taylor and Jamar Test), before and after a 3-week long rehabilitative treatment. Subjects were randomized in two groups: while the control group (n = 13) underwent a traditional rehabilitative protocol, the experimental group (n = 10) was treated replacing traditional exercises with robot-aided ones. RESULTS: Functionality, assessed through the function subscale of PRWE scale, improved in both groups (experimental p = 0.016; control p < 0.001) and was comparable between groups, both pre (U = 45.5, p = 0.355) and post (U = 47, p = 0.597) treatment. Additionally, even though groups’ performance during the robotic assessment was comparable before the treatment (U = 36, p = 0.077), after rehabilitation the experimental group presented better results than the control one (U = 26, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: This work can be considered a starting point for introducing the use of robotic devices in the orthopedic field. The robot-aided rehabilitative treatment was effective and comparable to the traditional one. Preserving efficacy and safety conditions, a systematic use of these devices could lead to decrease human therapists’ effort, increase repeatability and accuracy of assessments, and promote subject’s engagement and voluntary participation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT04739644. Registered on February 4, 2021—Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04739644. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8406564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84065642021-08-31 Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial Albanese, Giulia Aurora Taglione, Elisa Gasparini, Cecilia Grandi, Sara Pettinelli, Foebe Sardelli, Claudio Catitti, Paolo Sandini, Giulio Masia, Lorenzo Zenzeri, Jacopo J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: In recent years, many studies focused on the use of robotic devices for both the assessment and the neuro-motor reeducation of upper limb in subjects after stroke, spinal cord injuries or affected by neurological disorders. Contrarily, it is still hard to find examples of robot-aided assessment and rehabilitation after traumatic injuries in the orthopedic field. However, those benefits related to the use of robotic devices are expected also in orthopedic functional reeducation. METHODS: After a wrist injury occurred at their workplace, wrist functionality of twenty-three subjects was evaluated through a robot-based assessment and clinical measures (Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation, Jebsen-Taylor and Jamar Test), before and after a 3-week long rehabilitative treatment. Subjects were randomized in two groups: while the control group (n = 13) underwent a traditional rehabilitative protocol, the experimental group (n = 10) was treated replacing traditional exercises with robot-aided ones. RESULTS: Functionality, assessed through the function subscale of PRWE scale, improved in both groups (experimental p = 0.016; control p < 0.001) and was comparable between groups, both pre (U = 45.5, p = 0.355) and post (U = 47, p = 0.597) treatment. Additionally, even though groups’ performance during the robotic assessment was comparable before the treatment (U = 36, p = 0.077), after rehabilitation the experimental group presented better results than the control one (U = 26, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: This work can be considered a starting point for introducing the use of robotic devices in the orthopedic field. The robot-aided rehabilitative treatment was effective and comparable to the traditional one. Preserving efficacy and safety conditions, a systematic use of these devices could lead to decrease human therapists’ effort, increase repeatability and accuracy of assessments, and promote subject’s engagement and voluntary participation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT04739644. Registered on February 4, 2021—Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04739644. BioMed Central 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8406564/ /pubmed/34465356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00925-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Albanese, Giulia Aurora Taglione, Elisa Gasparini, Cecilia Grandi, Sara Pettinelli, Foebe Sardelli, Claudio Catitti, Paolo Sandini, Giulio Masia, Lorenzo Zenzeri, Jacopo Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8406564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34465356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00925-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albanesegiuliaaurora efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT taglioneelisa efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gasparinicecilia efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT grandisara efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pettinellifoebe efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sardelliclaudio efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT catittipaolo efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sandinigiulio efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT masialorenzo efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zenzerijacopo efficacyofwristrobotaidedorthopedicrehabilitationarandomizedcontrolledtrial |