Cargando…

A Prognostic Model of Gastrointestinal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND: The digestive tract is the most common site of extranodal involvement in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and its prognostic evaluation is different from that of ordinary DLBCL. Currently, for gastrointestinal lymphoma, in addition to the Ann Arbor staging system, the Lugano and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Fan, Wang, Zhan-fang, Tian, Lei, Dong, Fei, Wang, Jing, Jing, Hong-mei, Ke, Xiao-yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8406815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449759
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.929898
_version_ 1783746560168820736
author Gao, Fan
Wang, Zhan-fang
Tian, Lei
Dong, Fei
Wang, Jing
Jing, Hong-mei
Ke, Xiao-yan
author_facet Gao, Fan
Wang, Zhan-fang
Tian, Lei
Dong, Fei
Wang, Jing
Jing, Hong-mei
Ke, Xiao-yan
author_sort Gao, Fan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The digestive tract is the most common site of extranodal involvement in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and its prognostic evaluation is different from that of ordinary DLBCL. Currently, for gastrointestinal lymphoma, in addition to the Ann Arbor staging system, the Lugano and the TNM staging systems are commonly used. However, there is no effective prognostic model to identify poor prognosis in patients with localized gastrointestinal diffuse large B cell lymphoma (GI-DLBCL). MATERIAL/METHODS: This study included 82 patients with GI-DLBCL that had a median follow-up of 75 months, and developed a model (HLAMA) with 5 variables: hemoglobin, age, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum albumin, and the maximum intra-abdominal lesion diameter (MIALD). The specific indicators are: HGB <105 g/L (2 points); LDH ≥300 U/L; age ≥75 years, ALB <38 g/L, MIALD ≥4 cm (each scoring 1 point). We also developed a simplified model, which includes only 3 variables (HGB, LDH, and age). RESULTS: HLAMA model and the simplified model both demonstrated good ability to predict prognosis of patients with GI-DLBCL (P<0.001), performing better than the IPI score as it could distinguish low-risk groups in relatively elderly patients (60–75 years old). CONCLUSIONS: This study established a prognostic model for diffuse large B cell lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Both the HLAMA model and its simplified version are similar to the IPI score, but could be considered better as they can provide a simpler and more accurate prognostic assessment in patients with GI-DLBCL. For patients with localized GI-DLBCL, our model could distinguish high-risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8406815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84068152021-09-14 A Prognostic Model of Gastrointestinal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Gao, Fan Wang, Zhan-fang Tian, Lei Dong, Fei Wang, Jing Jing, Hong-mei Ke, Xiao-yan Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The digestive tract is the most common site of extranodal involvement in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and its prognostic evaluation is different from that of ordinary DLBCL. Currently, for gastrointestinal lymphoma, in addition to the Ann Arbor staging system, the Lugano and the TNM staging systems are commonly used. However, there is no effective prognostic model to identify poor prognosis in patients with localized gastrointestinal diffuse large B cell lymphoma (GI-DLBCL). MATERIAL/METHODS: This study included 82 patients with GI-DLBCL that had a median follow-up of 75 months, and developed a model (HLAMA) with 5 variables: hemoglobin, age, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum albumin, and the maximum intra-abdominal lesion diameter (MIALD). The specific indicators are: HGB <105 g/L (2 points); LDH ≥300 U/L; age ≥75 years, ALB <38 g/L, MIALD ≥4 cm (each scoring 1 point). We also developed a simplified model, which includes only 3 variables (HGB, LDH, and age). RESULTS: HLAMA model and the simplified model both demonstrated good ability to predict prognosis of patients with GI-DLBCL (P<0.001), performing better than the IPI score as it could distinguish low-risk groups in relatively elderly patients (60–75 years old). CONCLUSIONS: This study established a prognostic model for diffuse large B cell lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Both the HLAMA model and its simplified version are similar to the IPI score, but could be considered better as they can provide a simpler and more accurate prognostic assessment in patients with GI-DLBCL. For patients with localized GI-DLBCL, our model could distinguish high-risk patients. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8406815/ /pubmed/34449759 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.929898 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Gao, Fan
Wang, Zhan-fang
Tian, Lei
Dong, Fei
Wang, Jing
Jing, Hong-mei
Ke, Xiao-yan
A Prognostic Model of Gastrointestinal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
title A Prognostic Model of Gastrointestinal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
title_full A Prognostic Model of Gastrointestinal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
title_fullStr A Prognostic Model of Gastrointestinal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed A Prognostic Model of Gastrointestinal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
title_short A Prognostic Model of Gastrointestinal Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
title_sort prognostic model of gastrointestinal diffuse large b cell lymphoma
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8406815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449759
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.929898
work_keys_str_mv AT gaofan aprognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT wangzhanfang aprognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT tianlei aprognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT dongfei aprognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT wangjing aprognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT jinghongmei aprognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT kexiaoyan aprognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT gaofan prognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT wangzhanfang prognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT tianlei prognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT dongfei prognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT wangjing prognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT jinghongmei prognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT kexiaoyan prognosticmodelofgastrointestinaldiffuselargebcelllymphoma