Cargando…

Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study whether dimethyl fumarate is superior to placebo in decreasing CSF concentrations of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS). METHODS: In the double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study dimethyl FUMArate treatment in Progre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Højsgaard Chow, Helene, Talbot, Jacob, Lundell, Henrik, Gøbel Madsen, Camilla, Marstrand, Lisbet, Lange, Theis, Mahler, Mie Reith, Buhelt, Sophie, Holm Hansen, Rikke, Blinkenberg, Morten, Romme Christensen, Jeppe, Soelberg Sørensen, Per, Rode von Essen, Marina, Siebner, Hartwig Roman, Sellebjerg, Finn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8407149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001037
_version_ 1783746599676018688
author Højsgaard Chow, Helene
Talbot, Jacob
Lundell, Henrik
Gøbel Madsen, Camilla
Marstrand, Lisbet
Lange, Theis
Mahler, Mie Reith
Buhelt, Sophie
Holm Hansen, Rikke
Blinkenberg, Morten
Romme Christensen, Jeppe
Soelberg Sørensen, Per
Rode von Essen, Marina
Siebner, Hartwig Roman
Sellebjerg, Finn
author_facet Højsgaard Chow, Helene
Talbot, Jacob
Lundell, Henrik
Gøbel Madsen, Camilla
Marstrand, Lisbet
Lange, Theis
Mahler, Mie Reith
Buhelt, Sophie
Holm Hansen, Rikke
Blinkenberg, Morten
Romme Christensen, Jeppe
Soelberg Sørensen, Per
Rode von Essen, Marina
Siebner, Hartwig Roman
Sellebjerg, Finn
author_sort Højsgaard Chow, Helene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study whether dimethyl fumarate is superior to placebo in decreasing CSF concentrations of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS). METHODS: In the double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study dimethyl FUMArate treatment in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (FUMAPMS), patients with PPMS were randomly assigned to treatment with 240 mg dimethyl fumarate or placebo in a 1:1 ratio for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in concentration of NFL in the CSF. Secondary endpoints included other CSF biomarkers and clinical and MRI measures. Efficacy was evaluated for the full data set by multiple imputations to account for missing data. Safety was assessed for the full data set. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (mean age 54.9 years [SD 6.1], median Expanded Disability Status Scale 4.0 [nterquartile range 4.0–6.0], disease duration 14.1 [SD 9.4], and 21 [39%] female) were randomized to either placebo (n = 27) or dimethyl fumarate (n = 27) therapy. At screening CSF concentrations, adjusted for age and sex, of NFL, myelin basic protein (MBP), soluble CD27, chitinase 3-like 1, and B-cell maturation antigen were higher than in a group of symptomatic controls. Twenty-six patients (96%) in the dimethyl fumarate group and 24 patients (89%) in the placebo group completed the randomized phase. Mean change in CSF concentrations of NFL did not differ between groups (mean difference 99 ng/L; 95% CI −292 to 491 ng/L). MBP in CSF decreased in the treatment group (−182 ng/L, 95% CI −323 to −41 ng/L compared with placebo). The difference observed in the multiple imputation data set was not significant in a per protocol analysis. This was nominally significant in the multiple imputation data set but not in the per protocol analysis This was not found in the per protocol analysis Other secondary and tertiary outcomes were not affected. Various infections, lymphopenia, flushing, and gastrointestinal side effects were more frequent in the dimethyl fumarate group. Serious adverse events were similar between groups. DISCUSSION: Dimethyl fumarate treatment for 48 weeks had no effect on any of the investigated efficacy measures in patients with PPMS. We did not observe adverse events not anticipated for dimethyl fumarate treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02959658. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with PPMS, dimethyl fumarate treatment has no effect on CSF NFL levels compared with placebo treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8407149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84071492021-09-01 Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Højsgaard Chow, Helene Talbot, Jacob Lundell, Henrik Gøbel Madsen, Camilla Marstrand, Lisbet Lange, Theis Mahler, Mie Reith Buhelt, Sophie Holm Hansen, Rikke Blinkenberg, Morten Romme Christensen, Jeppe Soelberg Sørensen, Per Rode von Essen, Marina Siebner, Hartwig Roman Sellebjerg, Finn Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study whether dimethyl fumarate is superior to placebo in decreasing CSF concentrations of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS). METHODS: In the double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study dimethyl FUMArate treatment in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (FUMAPMS), patients with PPMS were randomly assigned to treatment with 240 mg dimethyl fumarate or placebo in a 1:1 ratio for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in concentration of NFL in the CSF. Secondary endpoints included other CSF biomarkers and clinical and MRI measures. Efficacy was evaluated for the full data set by multiple imputations to account for missing data. Safety was assessed for the full data set. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (mean age 54.9 years [SD 6.1], median Expanded Disability Status Scale 4.0 [nterquartile range 4.0–6.0], disease duration 14.1 [SD 9.4], and 21 [39%] female) were randomized to either placebo (n = 27) or dimethyl fumarate (n = 27) therapy. At screening CSF concentrations, adjusted for age and sex, of NFL, myelin basic protein (MBP), soluble CD27, chitinase 3-like 1, and B-cell maturation antigen were higher than in a group of symptomatic controls. Twenty-six patients (96%) in the dimethyl fumarate group and 24 patients (89%) in the placebo group completed the randomized phase. Mean change in CSF concentrations of NFL did not differ between groups (mean difference 99 ng/L; 95% CI −292 to 491 ng/L). MBP in CSF decreased in the treatment group (−182 ng/L, 95% CI −323 to −41 ng/L compared with placebo). The difference observed in the multiple imputation data set was not significant in a per protocol analysis. This was nominally significant in the multiple imputation data set but not in the per protocol analysis This was not found in the per protocol analysis Other secondary and tertiary outcomes were not affected. Various infections, lymphopenia, flushing, and gastrointestinal side effects were more frequent in the dimethyl fumarate group. Serious adverse events were similar between groups. DISCUSSION: Dimethyl fumarate treatment for 48 weeks had no effect on any of the investigated efficacy measures in patients with PPMS. We did not observe adverse events not anticipated for dimethyl fumarate treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02959658. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with PPMS, dimethyl fumarate treatment has no effect on CSF NFL levels compared with placebo treatment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8407149/ /pubmed/34429340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001037 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Højsgaard Chow, Helene
Talbot, Jacob
Lundell, Henrik
Gøbel Madsen, Camilla
Marstrand, Lisbet
Lange, Theis
Mahler, Mie Reith
Buhelt, Sophie
Holm Hansen, Rikke
Blinkenberg, Morten
Romme Christensen, Jeppe
Soelberg Sørensen, Per
Rode von Essen, Marina
Siebner, Hartwig Roman
Sellebjerg, Finn
Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
title Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_full Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_short Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_sort dimethyl fumarate treatment in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a randomized, controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8407149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001037
work_keys_str_mv AT højsgaardchowhelene dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT talbotjacob dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lundellhenrik dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gøbelmadsencamilla dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marstrandlisbet dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT langetheis dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mahlermiereith dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT buheltsophie dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT holmhansenrikke dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT blinkenbergmorten dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rommechristensenjeppe dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT soelbergsørensenper dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rodevonessenmarina dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT siebnerhartwigroman dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sellebjergfinn dimethylfumaratetreatmentinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial