Cargando…

Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 human premolars were included in this study. The samples were first arranged following a standard protocol for bracketing and then debonded using the ultrasonic scaler (US), debonding plier (DP), ligature cutter (LC), and thermal method (TM). Depending on the tec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bora, Neelutpal, Mahanta, Putul, Konwar, Ranjumoni, Basumatari, Bharati, Phukan, Chiranjita, Kalita, Deepjyoti, Gojendra Singh, Senjam, Deka, Sangeeta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8407970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5567863
_version_ 1783746726685835264
author Bora, Neelutpal
Mahanta, Putul
Konwar, Ranjumoni
Basumatari, Bharati
Phukan, Chiranjita
Kalita, Deepjyoti
Gojendra Singh, Senjam
Deka, Sangeeta
author_facet Bora, Neelutpal
Mahanta, Putul
Konwar, Ranjumoni
Basumatari, Bharati
Phukan, Chiranjita
Kalita, Deepjyoti
Gojendra Singh, Senjam
Deka, Sangeeta
author_sort Bora, Neelutpal
collection PubMed
description MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 human premolars were included in this study. The samples were first arranged following a standard protocol for bracketing and then debonded using the ultrasonic scaler (US), debonding plier (DP), ligature cutter (LC), and thermal method (TM). Depending on the technique applied for debonding, the specimens were randomly divided into four groups with 20 samples, each keeping a 1 : 1 ratio. During the debonding process, the time taken for each bracket removal was recorded using a stopwatch. To assess the difference in mean time required for debonding among the four techniques, one-way ANOVA test was applied along with Tukey's HSD to compare the two methods. RESULTS: The time range and the mean time required for the four techniques analyzed show that the DP method has the highest range of time needed for debonding with 0.97–2.56 seconds, while LC methods have the least time range taking 0.46 to 1.79 seconds. TM's mean time to debond is the highest at 1.5880 seconds. LC method has the lowest mean debonding time of 0.9880 seconds. The one-way ANOVA test has shown the mean debonding time required by the four techniques to be significantly different (p < 0.001). Tukey's HSD multiple comparisons also show that the mean time to debond using the LC method is substantially less than the other three methods (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The mean debonding time for the TM was substantially the highest, followed by the US and DP. Debonding with the LC technique required the least time. This study shows some limelight towards the effectiveness of the LC method as it is the least time-consuming technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8407970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84079702021-09-01 Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study Bora, Neelutpal Mahanta, Putul Konwar, Ranjumoni Basumatari, Bharati Phukan, Chiranjita Kalita, Deepjyoti Gojendra Singh, Senjam Deka, Sangeeta J Healthc Eng Research Article MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 human premolars were included in this study. The samples were first arranged following a standard protocol for bracketing and then debonded using the ultrasonic scaler (US), debonding plier (DP), ligature cutter (LC), and thermal method (TM). Depending on the technique applied for debonding, the specimens were randomly divided into four groups with 20 samples, each keeping a 1 : 1 ratio. During the debonding process, the time taken for each bracket removal was recorded using a stopwatch. To assess the difference in mean time required for debonding among the four techniques, one-way ANOVA test was applied along with Tukey's HSD to compare the two methods. RESULTS: The time range and the mean time required for the four techniques analyzed show that the DP method has the highest range of time needed for debonding with 0.97–2.56 seconds, while LC methods have the least time range taking 0.46 to 1.79 seconds. TM's mean time to debond is the highest at 1.5880 seconds. LC method has the lowest mean debonding time of 0.9880 seconds. The one-way ANOVA test has shown the mean debonding time required by the four techniques to be significantly different (p < 0.001). Tukey's HSD multiple comparisons also show that the mean time to debond using the LC method is substantially less than the other three methods (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The mean debonding time for the TM was substantially the highest, followed by the US and DP. Debonding with the LC technique required the least time. This study shows some limelight towards the effectiveness of the LC method as it is the least time-consuming technique. Hindawi 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8407970/ /pubmed/34476047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5567863 Text en Copyright © 2021 Neelutpal Bora et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bora, Neelutpal
Mahanta, Putul
Konwar, Ranjumoni
Basumatari, Bharati
Phukan, Chiranjita
Kalita, Deepjyoti
Gojendra Singh, Senjam
Deka, Sangeeta
Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study
title Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study
title_full Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study
title_short Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study
title_sort evaluation of time consumption for debonding brackets using different techniques: a hospital-based study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8407970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5567863
work_keys_str_mv AT boraneelutpal evaluationoftimeconsumptionfordebondingbracketsusingdifferenttechniquesahospitalbasedstudy
AT mahantaputul evaluationoftimeconsumptionfordebondingbracketsusingdifferenttechniquesahospitalbasedstudy
AT konwarranjumoni evaluationoftimeconsumptionfordebondingbracketsusingdifferenttechniquesahospitalbasedstudy
AT basumataribharati evaluationoftimeconsumptionfordebondingbracketsusingdifferenttechniquesahospitalbasedstudy
AT phukanchiranjita evaluationoftimeconsumptionfordebondingbracketsusingdifferenttechniquesahospitalbasedstudy
AT kalitadeepjyoti evaluationoftimeconsumptionfordebondingbracketsusingdifferenttechniquesahospitalbasedstudy
AT gojendrasinghsenjam evaluationoftimeconsumptionfordebondingbracketsusingdifferenttechniquesahospitalbasedstudy
AT dekasangeeta evaluationoftimeconsumptionfordebondingbracketsusingdifferenttechniquesahospitalbasedstudy