Cargando…
Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm?
Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) regimens, variously constituted with topical antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) and protocolized parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (PPAP), appear highly effective for preventing ICU-acquired infections but only within randomized concurrent control trials (RCCT’s)....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8408564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03744-w |
_version_ | 1783746849797046272 |
---|---|
author | Hurley, James C. |
author_facet | Hurley, James C. |
author_sort | Hurley, James C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) regimens, variously constituted with topical antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) and protocolized parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (PPAP), appear highly effective for preventing ICU-acquired infections but only within randomized concurrent control trials (RCCT’s). Confusingly, SDD is also a concept which, if true, implies population benefit. The SDD concept can finally be reified in humans using the broad accumulated evidence base, including studies of TAP and PPAP that used non-concurrent controls (NCC), as a natural experiment. However, this test implicates overall population harm with higher event rates associated with SDD use within the ICU context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8408564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84085642021-09-01 Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm? Hurley, James C. Crit Care Viewpoint Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) regimens, variously constituted with topical antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) and protocolized parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (PPAP), appear highly effective for preventing ICU-acquired infections but only within randomized concurrent control trials (RCCT’s). Confusingly, SDD is also a concept which, if true, implies population benefit. The SDD concept can finally be reified in humans using the broad accumulated evidence base, including studies of TAP and PPAP that used non-concurrent controls (NCC), as a natural experiment. However, this test implicates overall population harm with higher event rates associated with SDD use within the ICU context. BioMed Central 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8408564/ /pubmed/34470654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03744-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Hurley, James C. Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm? |
title | Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm? |
title_full | Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm? |
title_fullStr | Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm? |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm? |
title_short | Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm? |
title_sort | selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with population harm? |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8408564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03744-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hurleyjamesc selectivedigestivedecontaminationaseeminglyeffectiveregimenwithindividualbenefitoraflawedconceptwithpopulationharm |