Cargando…
Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma
BACKGROUND: Survival in patients with IDH1/2-mutant (mt) anaplastic astrocytomas is highly variable. We have used the prospective phase 3 CATNON trial to identify molecular factors related to outcome in IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients. METHODS: The CATNON trial randomized 751 adult patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8408862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab088 |
_version_ | 1783746882274590720 |
---|---|
author | Tesileanu, C Mircea S van den Bent, Martin J Sanson, Marc Wick, Wolfgang Brandes, Alba A Clement, Paul M Erridge, Sara C Vogelbaum, Michael A Nowak, Anna K Baurain, Jean F Mason, Warren P Wheeler, Helen Chinot, Olivier L Gill, Sanjeev Griffin, Matthew Rogers, Leland Taal, Walter Rudà, Roberta Weller, Michael McBain, Catherine van Linde, Myra E Sabedot, Thais S Hoogstrate, Youri von Deimling, Andreas de Heer, Iris van IJcken, Wilfred F J Brouwer, Rutger W W Aldape, Kenneth Jenkins, Robert B Dubbink, Hendrikus J Kros, Johan M Wesseling, Pieter Cheung, Kin Jip Golfinopoulos, Vassilis Baumert, Brigitta G Gorlia, Thierry Noushmehr, Houtan French, Pim J |
author_facet | Tesileanu, C Mircea S van den Bent, Martin J Sanson, Marc Wick, Wolfgang Brandes, Alba A Clement, Paul M Erridge, Sara C Vogelbaum, Michael A Nowak, Anna K Baurain, Jean F Mason, Warren P Wheeler, Helen Chinot, Olivier L Gill, Sanjeev Griffin, Matthew Rogers, Leland Taal, Walter Rudà, Roberta Weller, Michael McBain, Catherine van Linde, Myra E Sabedot, Thais S Hoogstrate, Youri von Deimling, Andreas de Heer, Iris van IJcken, Wilfred F J Brouwer, Rutger W W Aldape, Kenneth Jenkins, Robert B Dubbink, Hendrikus J Kros, Johan M Wesseling, Pieter Cheung, Kin Jip Golfinopoulos, Vassilis Baumert, Brigitta G Gorlia, Thierry Noushmehr, Houtan French, Pim J |
author_sort | Tesileanu, C Mircea S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Survival in patients with IDH1/2-mutant (mt) anaplastic astrocytomas is highly variable. We have used the prospective phase 3 CATNON trial to identify molecular factors related to outcome in IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients. METHODS: The CATNON trial randomized 751 adult patients with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-codeleted anaplastic glioma to 59.4 Gy radiotherapy +/− concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide. The presence of necrosis and/or microvascular proliferation was scored at central pathology review. Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip arrays were used for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis and the determination of copy number variations (CNV). Two DNA methylation-based tumor classifiers were used for risk stratification. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using 1 of the 2 glioma-tailored NGS panels. The primary endpoint was overall survival measured from the date of randomization. RESULTS: Full analysis (genome-wide DNA methylation and NGS) was successfully performed on 654 tumors. Of these, 432 tumors were IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytomas. Both epigenetic classifiers identified poor prognosis patients that partially overlapped. A predictive prognostic Cox proportional hazard model identified that independent prognostic factors for IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients included; age, mini-mental state examination score, treatment with concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide, the epigenetic classifiers, PDGFRA amplification, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, PI3K mutations, and total CNV load. Independent recursive partitioning analysis highlights the importance of these factors for patient prognostication. CONCLUSION: Both clinical and molecular factors identify IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients with worse outcome. These results will further refine the current WHO criteria for glioma classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8408862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84088622021-09-02 Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma Tesileanu, C Mircea S van den Bent, Martin J Sanson, Marc Wick, Wolfgang Brandes, Alba A Clement, Paul M Erridge, Sara C Vogelbaum, Michael A Nowak, Anna K Baurain, Jean F Mason, Warren P Wheeler, Helen Chinot, Olivier L Gill, Sanjeev Griffin, Matthew Rogers, Leland Taal, Walter Rudà, Roberta Weller, Michael McBain, Catherine van Linde, Myra E Sabedot, Thais S Hoogstrate, Youri von Deimling, Andreas de Heer, Iris van IJcken, Wilfred F J Brouwer, Rutger W W Aldape, Kenneth Jenkins, Robert B Dubbink, Hendrikus J Kros, Johan M Wesseling, Pieter Cheung, Kin Jip Golfinopoulos, Vassilis Baumert, Brigitta G Gorlia, Thierry Noushmehr, Houtan French, Pim J Neuro Oncol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Survival in patients with IDH1/2-mutant (mt) anaplastic astrocytomas is highly variable. We have used the prospective phase 3 CATNON trial to identify molecular factors related to outcome in IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients. METHODS: The CATNON trial randomized 751 adult patients with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-codeleted anaplastic glioma to 59.4 Gy radiotherapy +/− concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide. The presence of necrosis and/or microvascular proliferation was scored at central pathology review. Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip arrays were used for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis and the determination of copy number variations (CNV). Two DNA methylation-based tumor classifiers were used for risk stratification. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using 1 of the 2 glioma-tailored NGS panels. The primary endpoint was overall survival measured from the date of randomization. RESULTS: Full analysis (genome-wide DNA methylation and NGS) was successfully performed on 654 tumors. Of these, 432 tumors were IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytomas. Both epigenetic classifiers identified poor prognosis patients that partially overlapped. A predictive prognostic Cox proportional hazard model identified that independent prognostic factors for IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients included; age, mini-mental state examination score, treatment with concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide, the epigenetic classifiers, PDGFRA amplification, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, PI3K mutations, and total CNV load. Independent recursive partitioning analysis highlights the importance of these factors for patient prognostication. CONCLUSION: Both clinical and molecular factors identify IDH1/2mt anaplastic astrocytoma patients with worse outcome. These results will further refine the current WHO criteria for glioma classification. Oxford University Press 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8408862/ /pubmed/33914057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab088 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Tesileanu, C Mircea S van den Bent, Martin J Sanson, Marc Wick, Wolfgang Brandes, Alba A Clement, Paul M Erridge, Sara C Vogelbaum, Michael A Nowak, Anna K Baurain, Jean F Mason, Warren P Wheeler, Helen Chinot, Olivier L Gill, Sanjeev Griffin, Matthew Rogers, Leland Taal, Walter Rudà, Roberta Weller, Michael McBain, Catherine van Linde, Myra E Sabedot, Thais S Hoogstrate, Youri von Deimling, Andreas de Heer, Iris van IJcken, Wilfred F J Brouwer, Rutger W W Aldape, Kenneth Jenkins, Robert B Dubbink, Hendrikus J Kros, Johan M Wesseling, Pieter Cheung, Kin Jip Golfinopoulos, Vassilis Baumert, Brigitta G Gorlia, Thierry Noushmehr, Houtan French, Pim J Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma |
title | Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma |
title_full | Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma |
title_fullStr | Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma |
title_short | Prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, EORTC CATNON trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma |
title_sort | prognostic significance of genome-wide dna methylation profiles within the randomized, phase 3, eortc catnon trial on non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8408862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tesileanucmirceas prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT vandenbentmartinj prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT sansonmarc prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT wickwolfgang prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT brandesalbaa prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT clementpaulm prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT erridgesarac prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT vogelbaummichaela prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT nowakannak prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT baurainjeanf prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT masonwarrenp prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT wheelerhelen prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT chinotolivierl prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT gillsanjeev prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT griffinmatthew prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT rogersleland prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT taalwalter prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT rudaroberta prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT wellermichael prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT mcbaincatherine prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT vanlindemyrae prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT sabedotthaiss prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT hoogstrateyouri prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT vondeimlingandreas prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT deheeriris prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT vanijckenwilfredfj prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT brouwerrutgerww prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT aldapekenneth prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT jenkinsrobertb prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT dubbinkhendrikusj prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT krosjohanm prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT wesselingpieter prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT cheungkinjip prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT golfinopoulosvassilis prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT baumertbrigittag prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT gorliathierry prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT noushmehrhoutan prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma AT frenchpimj prognosticsignificanceofgenomewidednamethylationprofileswithintherandomizedphase3eortccatnontrialonnon1p19qdeletedanaplasticglioma |