Cargando…

Randomized multi-reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), a validated treatment for brain tumors, requires accurate tumor contouring. This manual segmentation process is time-consuming and prone to substantial inter-practitioner variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) with deep neural networks have increasingl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Shao-Lun, Xiao, Fu-Ren, Cheng, Jason Chia-Hsien, Yang, Wen-Chi, Cheng, Yueh-Hung, Chang, Yu-Cheng, Lin, Jhih-Yuan, Liang, Chih-Hung, Lu, Jen-Tang, Chen, Ya-Fang, Hsu, Feng-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8408868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33754155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab071
_version_ 1783746882745401344
author Lu, Shao-Lun
Xiao, Fu-Ren
Cheng, Jason Chia-Hsien
Yang, Wen-Chi
Cheng, Yueh-Hung
Chang, Yu-Cheng
Lin, Jhih-Yuan
Liang, Chih-Hung
Lu, Jen-Tang
Chen, Ya-Fang
Hsu, Feng-Ming
author_facet Lu, Shao-Lun
Xiao, Fu-Ren
Cheng, Jason Chia-Hsien
Yang, Wen-Chi
Cheng, Yueh-Hung
Chang, Yu-Cheng
Lin, Jhih-Yuan
Liang, Chih-Hung
Lu, Jen-Tang
Chen, Ya-Fang
Hsu, Feng-Ming
author_sort Lu, Shao-Lun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), a validated treatment for brain tumors, requires accurate tumor contouring. This manual segmentation process is time-consuming and prone to substantial inter-practitioner variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) with deep neural networks have increasingly been proposed for use in lesion detection and segmentation but have seldom been validated in a clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, cross-modal, multi-reader, multispecialty, multi-case study to evaluate the impact of AI assistance on brain tumor SRS. A state-of-the-art auto-contouring algorithm built on multi-modality imaging and ensemble neural networks was integrated into the clinical workflow. Nine medical professionals contoured the same case series in two reader modes (assisted or unassisted) with a memory washout period of 6 weeks between each section. The case series consisted of 10 algorithm-unseen cases, including five cases of brain metastases, three of meningiomas, and two of acoustic neuromas. Among the nine readers, three experienced experts determined the ground truths of tumor contours. RESULTS: With the AI assistance, the inter-reader agreement significantly increased (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC] from 0.86 to 0.90, P < 0.001). Algorithm-assisted physicians demonstrated a higher sensitivity for lesion detection than unassisted physicians (91.3% vs 82.6%, P = .030). AI assistance improved contouring accuracy, with an average increase in DSC of 0.028, especially for physicians with less SRS experience (average DSC from 0.847 to 0.865, P = .002). In addition, AI assistance improved efficiency with a median of 30.8% time-saving. Less-experienced clinicians gained prominent improvement on contouring accuracy but less benefit in reduction of working hours. By contrast, SRS specialists had a relatively minor advantage in DSC, but greater time-saving with the aid of AI. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning neural networks can be optimally utilized to improve accuracy and efficiency for the clinical workflow in brain tumor SRS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8408868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84088682021-09-02 Randomized multi-reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks Lu, Shao-Lun Xiao, Fu-Ren Cheng, Jason Chia-Hsien Yang, Wen-Chi Cheng, Yueh-Hung Chang, Yu-Cheng Lin, Jhih-Yuan Liang, Chih-Hung Lu, Jen-Tang Chen, Ya-Fang Hsu, Feng-Ming Neuro Oncol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), a validated treatment for brain tumors, requires accurate tumor contouring. This manual segmentation process is time-consuming and prone to substantial inter-practitioner variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) with deep neural networks have increasingly been proposed for use in lesion detection and segmentation but have seldom been validated in a clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, cross-modal, multi-reader, multispecialty, multi-case study to evaluate the impact of AI assistance on brain tumor SRS. A state-of-the-art auto-contouring algorithm built on multi-modality imaging and ensemble neural networks was integrated into the clinical workflow. Nine medical professionals contoured the same case series in two reader modes (assisted or unassisted) with a memory washout period of 6 weeks between each section. The case series consisted of 10 algorithm-unseen cases, including five cases of brain metastases, three of meningiomas, and two of acoustic neuromas. Among the nine readers, three experienced experts determined the ground truths of tumor contours. RESULTS: With the AI assistance, the inter-reader agreement significantly increased (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC] from 0.86 to 0.90, P < 0.001). Algorithm-assisted physicians demonstrated a higher sensitivity for lesion detection than unassisted physicians (91.3% vs 82.6%, P = .030). AI assistance improved contouring accuracy, with an average increase in DSC of 0.028, especially for physicians with less SRS experience (average DSC from 0.847 to 0.865, P = .002). In addition, AI assistance improved efficiency with a median of 30.8% time-saving. Less-experienced clinicians gained prominent improvement on contouring accuracy but less benefit in reduction of working hours. By contrast, SRS specialists had a relatively minor advantage in DSC, but greater time-saving with the aid of AI. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning neural networks can be optimally utilized to improve accuracy and efficiency for the clinical workflow in brain tumor SRS. Oxford University Press 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8408868/ /pubmed/33754155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab071 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Lu, Shao-Lun
Xiao, Fu-Ren
Cheng, Jason Chia-Hsien
Yang, Wen-Chi
Cheng, Yueh-Hung
Chang, Yu-Cheng
Lin, Jhih-Yuan
Liang, Chih-Hung
Lu, Jen-Tang
Chen, Ya-Fang
Hsu, Feng-Ming
Randomized multi-reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks
title Randomized multi-reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks
title_full Randomized multi-reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks
title_fullStr Randomized multi-reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks
title_full_unstemmed Randomized multi-reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks
title_short Randomized multi-reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks
title_sort randomized multi-reader evaluation of automated detection and segmentation of brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery with deep neural networks
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8408868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33754155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab071
work_keys_str_mv AT lushaolun randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT xiaofuren randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT chengjasonchiahsien randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT yangwenchi randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT chengyuehhung randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT changyucheng randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT linjhihyuan randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT liangchihhung randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT lujentang randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT chenyafang randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks
AT hsufengming randomizedmultireaderevaluationofautomateddetectionandsegmentationofbraintumorsinstereotacticradiosurgerywithdeepneuralnetworks