Cargando…

Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States

INTRODUCTION: Despite 3 million adults in the United States being admitted annually for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, we lack an understanding of the barriers to round-the-clock EGS care. Our objective was to measure gaps in round...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ingraham, Angela M., Chaffee, Scott M., Ayturk, M. Didem, Heh, Victor K., Kiefe, Catarina I., Santry, Heena P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000043
_version_ 1783746939434565632
author Ingraham, Angela M.
Chaffee, Scott M.
Ayturk, M. Didem
Heh, Victor K.
Kiefe, Catarina I.
Santry, Heena P.
author_facet Ingraham, Angela M.
Chaffee, Scott M.
Ayturk, M. Didem
Heh, Victor K.
Kiefe, Catarina I.
Santry, Heena P.
author_sort Ingraham, Angela M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite 3 million adults in the United States being admitted annually for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, we lack an understanding of the barriers to round-the-clock EGS care. Our objective was to measure gaps in round-the-clock EGS care. METHODS: From August 2015 to December 2015, we surveyed all US-based adult acute care general hospitals that have an emergency room and ≥1 operating room and provided EGS care, utilizing paper and electronic methods. Surgeons or chief medical officers were queried regarding EGS practices. RESULTS: Of 2811 hospitals, 1634 (58.1%) responded; 279 (17.1%) were unable to always provide round-the-clock EGS care. Rural location, smaller bed size, and nonteaching status were associated with lack of round-the-clock care. Inconsistent surgeon coverage was the primary reason for lacking round-the-clock EGS care (n = 162; 58.1%). However, lack of a tiered system for booking emergency cases, no anesthesia availability overnight, and no stipend for EGS call were also associated with the inability to provide round-the-clock EGS care. DISCUSSION: We found significant gaps in access to EGS care, often attributable to workforce deficiencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8409136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84091362022-03-01 Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States Ingraham, Angela M. Chaffee, Scott M. Ayturk, M. Didem Heh, Victor K. Kiefe, Catarina I. Santry, Heena P. Ann Surg Open Original Study INTRODUCTION: Despite 3 million adults in the United States being admitted annually for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, we lack an understanding of the barriers to round-the-clock EGS care. Our objective was to measure gaps in round-the-clock EGS care. METHODS: From August 2015 to December 2015, we surveyed all US-based adult acute care general hospitals that have an emergency room and ≥1 operating room and provided EGS care, utilizing paper and electronic methods. Surgeons or chief medical officers were queried regarding EGS practices. RESULTS: Of 2811 hospitals, 1634 (58.1%) responded; 279 (17.1%) were unable to always provide round-the-clock EGS care. Rural location, smaller bed size, and nonteaching status were associated with lack of round-the-clock care. Inconsistent surgeon coverage was the primary reason for lacking round-the-clock EGS care (n = 162; 58.1%). However, lack of a tiered system for booking emergency cases, no anesthesia availability overnight, and no stipend for EGS call were also associated with the inability to provide round-the-clock EGS care. DISCUSSION: We found significant gaps in access to EGS care, often attributable to workforce deficiencies. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8409136/ /pubmed/34485983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000043 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Study
Ingraham, Angela M.
Chaffee, Scott M.
Ayturk, M. Didem
Heh, Victor K.
Kiefe, Catarina I.
Santry, Heena P.
Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States
title Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States
title_full Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States
title_fullStr Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States
title_short Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States
title_sort gaps in emergency general surgery coverage in the united states
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000043
work_keys_str_mv AT ingrahamangelam gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates
AT chaffeescottm gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates
AT ayturkmdidem gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates
AT hehvictork gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates
AT kiefecatarinai gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates
AT santryheenap gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates