Cargando…
Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States
INTRODUCTION: Despite 3 million adults in the United States being admitted annually for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, we lack an understanding of the barriers to round-the-clock EGS care. Our objective was to measure gaps in round...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000043 |
_version_ | 1783746939434565632 |
---|---|
author | Ingraham, Angela M. Chaffee, Scott M. Ayturk, M. Didem Heh, Victor K. Kiefe, Catarina I. Santry, Heena P. |
author_facet | Ingraham, Angela M. Chaffee, Scott M. Ayturk, M. Didem Heh, Victor K. Kiefe, Catarina I. Santry, Heena P. |
author_sort | Ingraham, Angela M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite 3 million adults in the United States being admitted annually for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, we lack an understanding of the barriers to round-the-clock EGS care. Our objective was to measure gaps in round-the-clock EGS care. METHODS: From August 2015 to December 2015, we surveyed all US-based adult acute care general hospitals that have an emergency room and ≥1 operating room and provided EGS care, utilizing paper and electronic methods. Surgeons or chief medical officers were queried regarding EGS practices. RESULTS: Of 2811 hospitals, 1634 (58.1%) responded; 279 (17.1%) were unable to always provide round-the-clock EGS care. Rural location, smaller bed size, and nonteaching status were associated with lack of round-the-clock care. Inconsistent surgeon coverage was the primary reason for lacking round-the-clock EGS care (n = 162; 58.1%). However, lack of a tiered system for booking emergency cases, no anesthesia availability overnight, and no stipend for EGS call were also associated with the inability to provide round-the-clock EGS care. DISCUSSION: We found significant gaps in access to EGS care, often attributable to workforce deficiencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8409136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84091362022-03-01 Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States Ingraham, Angela M. Chaffee, Scott M. Ayturk, M. Didem Heh, Victor K. Kiefe, Catarina I. Santry, Heena P. Ann Surg Open Original Study INTRODUCTION: Despite 3 million adults in the United States being admitted annually for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions, which disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, we lack an understanding of the barriers to round-the-clock EGS care. Our objective was to measure gaps in round-the-clock EGS care. METHODS: From August 2015 to December 2015, we surveyed all US-based adult acute care general hospitals that have an emergency room and ≥1 operating room and provided EGS care, utilizing paper and electronic methods. Surgeons or chief medical officers were queried regarding EGS practices. RESULTS: Of 2811 hospitals, 1634 (58.1%) responded; 279 (17.1%) were unable to always provide round-the-clock EGS care. Rural location, smaller bed size, and nonteaching status were associated with lack of round-the-clock care. Inconsistent surgeon coverage was the primary reason for lacking round-the-clock EGS care (n = 162; 58.1%). However, lack of a tiered system for booking emergency cases, no anesthesia availability overnight, and no stipend for EGS call were also associated with the inability to provide round-the-clock EGS care. DISCUSSION: We found significant gaps in access to EGS care, often attributable to workforce deficiencies. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8409136/ /pubmed/34485983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000043 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Study Ingraham, Angela M. Chaffee, Scott M. Ayturk, M. Didem Heh, Victor K. Kiefe, Catarina I. Santry, Heena P. Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States |
title | Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States |
title_full | Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States |
title_fullStr | Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States |
title_short | Gaps in Emergency General Surgery Coverage in the United States |
title_sort | gaps in emergency general surgery coverage in the united states |
topic | Original Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ingrahamangelam gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates AT chaffeescottm gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates AT ayturkmdidem gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates AT hehvictork gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates AT kiefecatarinai gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates AT santryheenap gapsinemergencygeneralsurgerycoverageintheunitedstates |