Cargando…
Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment
PURPOPSE: This study aims to evaluate the ocular surface response after strabismus surgery, using two different materials for conjunctival closure. METHODS: Randomized prospective comparative study was done. After performing strabismus surgery, conjunctival flap was apposed with fibrin sealant in Gr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527865 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.322602 |
_version_ | 1783746981874630656 |
---|---|
author | Anand, Kamlesh Goyal, Gaurav Goel, Yashpal Bansal, Yuvika Rastogi, Anju Jaisingh, Kirti |
author_facet | Anand, Kamlesh Goyal, Gaurav Goel, Yashpal Bansal, Yuvika Rastogi, Anju Jaisingh, Kirti |
author_sort | Anand, Kamlesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOPSE: This study aims to evaluate the ocular surface response after strabismus surgery, using two different materials for conjunctival closure. METHODS: Randomized prospective comparative study was done. After performing strabismus surgery, conjunctival flap was apposed with fibrin sealant in Group 1 and 8-0 vicryl suture with buried knots in Group 2. Preoperative and postoperative measurement of tear film break up time and Schirmer test for tear secretion was done in both the groups of 30 patients each at regular follow-up visit up to 2 months. Postoperatively, both the groups were also compared for the resolution of discomfort and redness. RESULTS: Conjunctival recession was not seen in any group. Mean period was 5.8 days for resolution of discomfort (pain, lacrimation, and irritation) and 7.2 days for redness in Group 1 compared to 12 and 16 days in Group 2 (P < 0.05). During the study, we noticed significant decrease in tear film stability and increase in tear secretion in both the groups. However, in Group 2, the parameters were significantly more altered and even changes persisted for longer duration. CONCLUSION: Early rehabilitation of ocular surface might be related to unaltered healing process with the use of a biological substance (fibrin sealant) as compared to suture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8409358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84093582021-09-14 Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment Anand, Kamlesh Goyal, Gaurav Goel, Yashpal Bansal, Yuvika Rastogi, Anju Jaisingh, Kirti Saudi J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOPSE: This study aims to evaluate the ocular surface response after strabismus surgery, using two different materials for conjunctival closure. METHODS: Randomized prospective comparative study was done. After performing strabismus surgery, conjunctival flap was apposed with fibrin sealant in Group 1 and 8-0 vicryl suture with buried knots in Group 2. Preoperative and postoperative measurement of tear film break up time and Schirmer test for tear secretion was done in both the groups of 30 patients each at regular follow-up visit up to 2 months. Postoperatively, both the groups were also compared for the resolution of discomfort and redness. RESULTS: Conjunctival recession was not seen in any group. Mean period was 5.8 days for resolution of discomfort (pain, lacrimation, and irritation) and 7.2 days for redness in Group 1 compared to 12 and 16 days in Group 2 (P < 0.05). During the study, we noticed significant decrease in tear film stability and increase in tear secretion in both the groups. However, in Group 2, the parameters were significantly more altered and even changes persisted for longer duration. CONCLUSION: Early rehabilitation of ocular surface might be related to unaltered healing process with the use of a biological substance (fibrin sealant) as compared to suture. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8409358/ /pubmed/34527865 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.322602 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Anand, Kamlesh Goyal, Gaurav Goel, Yashpal Bansal, Yuvika Rastogi, Anju Jaisingh, Kirti Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment |
title | Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment |
title_full | Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment |
title_fullStr | Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment |
title_short | Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment |
title_sort | ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: an objective assessment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527865 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.322602 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anandkamlesh ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment AT goyalgaurav ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment AT goelyashpal ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment AT bansalyuvika ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment AT rastogianju ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment AT jaisinghkirti ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment |