Cargando…

Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment

PURPOPSE: This study aims to evaluate the ocular surface response after strabismus surgery, using two different materials for conjunctival closure. METHODS: Randomized prospective comparative study was done. After performing strabismus surgery, conjunctival flap was apposed with fibrin sealant in Gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anand, Kamlesh, Goyal, Gaurav, Goel, Yashpal, Bansal, Yuvika, Rastogi, Anju, Jaisingh, Kirti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527865
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.322602
_version_ 1783746981874630656
author Anand, Kamlesh
Goyal, Gaurav
Goel, Yashpal
Bansal, Yuvika
Rastogi, Anju
Jaisingh, Kirti
author_facet Anand, Kamlesh
Goyal, Gaurav
Goel, Yashpal
Bansal, Yuvika
Rastogi, Anju
Jaisingh, Kirti
author_sort Anand, Kamlesh
collection PubMed
description PURPOPSE: This study aims to evaluate the ocular surface response after strabismus surgery, using two different materials for conjunctival closure. METHODS: Randomized prospective comparative study was done. After performing strabismus surgery, conjunctival flap was apposed with fibrin sealant in Group 1 and 8-0 vicryl suture with buried knots in Group 2. Preoperative and postoperative measurement of tear film break up time and Schirmer test for tear secretion was done in both the groups of 30 patients each at regular follow-up visit up to 2 months. Postoperatively, both the groups were also compared for the resolution of discomfort and redness. RESULTS: Conjunctival recession was not seen in any group. Mean period was 5.8 days for resolution of discomfort (pain, lacrimation, and irritation) and 7.2 days for redness in Group 1 compared to 12 and 16 days in Group 2 (P < 0.05). During the study, we noticed significant decrease in tear film stability and increase in tear secretion in both the groups. However, in Group 2, the parameters were significantly more altered and even changes persisted for longer duration. CONCLUSION: Early rehabilitation of ocular surface might be related to unaltered healing process with the use of a biological substance (fibrin sealant) as compared to suture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8409358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84093582021-09-14 Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment Anand, Kamlesh Goyal, Gaurav Goel, Yashpal Bansal, Yuvika Rastogi, Anju Jaisingh, Kirti Saudi J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOPSE: This study aims to evaluate the ocular surface response after strabismus surgery, using two different materials for conjunctival closure. METHODS: Randomized prospective comparative study was done. After performing strabismus surgery, conjunctival flap was apposed with fibrin sealant in Group 1 and 8-0 vicryl suture with buried knots in Group 2. Preoperative and postoperative measurement of tear film break up time and Schirmer test for tear secretion was done in both the groups of 30 patients each at regular follow-up visit up to 2 months. Postoperatively, both the groups were also compared for the resolution of discomfort and redness. RESULTS: Conjunctival recession was not seen in any group. Mean period was 5.8 days for resolution of discomfort (pain, lacrimation, and irritation) and 7.2 days for redness in Group 1 compared to 12 and 16 days in Group 2 (P < 0.05). During the study, we noticed significant decrease in tear film stability and increase in tear secretion in both the groups. However, in Group 2, the parameters were significantly more altered and even changes persisted for longer duration. CONCLUSION: Early rehabilitation of ocular surface might be related to unaltered healing process with the use of a biological substance (fibrin sealant) as compared to suture. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8409358/ /pubmed/34527865 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.322602 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Anand, Kamlesh
Goyal, Gaurav
Goel, Yashpal
Bansal, Yuvika
Rastogi, Anju
Jaisingh, Kirti
Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment
title Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment
title_full Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment
title_fullStr Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment
title_full_unstemmed Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment
title_short Ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: An objective assessment
title_sort ocular surface response to fibrin sealant versus vicryl suture for conjunctival closure after strabismus surgery: an objective assessment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527865
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-4534.322602
work_keys_str_mv AT anandkamlesh ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment
AT goyalgaurav ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment
AT goelyashpal ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment
AT bansalyuvika ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment
AT rastogianju ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment
AT jaisinghkirti ocularsurfaceresponsetofibrinsealantversusvicrylsutureforconjunctivalclosureafterstrabismussurgeryanobjectiveassessment