Cargando…

Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries

Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Nathan B., Levi, Miriam, Morabito, Marco, Messeri, Alessandro, Ioannou, Leonidas G., Flouris, Andreas D., Samoutis, George, Pogačar, Tjaša, Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež, Piil, Jacob F., Nybo, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049
_version_ 1783747049905192960
author Morris, Nathan B.
Levi, Miriam
Morabito, Marco
Messeri, Alessandro
Ioannou, Leonidas G.
Flouris, Andreas D.
Samoutis, George
Pogačar, Tjaša
Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež
Piil, Jacob F.
Nybo, Lars
author_facet Morris, Nathan B.
Levi, Miriam
Morabito, Marco
Messeri, Alessandro
Ioannou, Leonidas G.
Flouris, Andreas D.
Samoutis, George
Pogačar, Tjaša
Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež
Piil, Jacob F.
Nybo, Lars
author_sort Morris, Nathan B.
collection PubMed
description Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end-users are not well elucidated. We therefore arranged two series of meetings with stakeholders to identify knowledge gaps, receive feedback on proposed cooling interventions, and discuss factors affecting implementation of heat-health interventions. This included four meetings attended by employers, employees, and health and safety officers (n = 41), and three meetings attended primarily by policy makers (n = 74), with feedback obtained via qualitative and quantitative questionnaires and focus group discussions. On a 10-point scale, both employers and employees valued worker safety (9.1 ± 1.8; mean±SD) and health (8.5 ± 1.9) as more important than protecting company profits (6.3 ± 2.3). Of the respondents, 41% were unaware of any cooling strategies at their company and of those who were aware, only 30% thought the interventions were effective. Following presentation of proposed interventions, the respondents rated “facilitated hydration”, “optimization of clothing/protective equipment”, and “rescheduling of work tasks” as the top-three preferred solutions. The main barriers for adopting cooling interventions were cost, feasibility, employer perceptions, and legislation. In conclusion, preventing negative health and safety effects was deemed to be more important than preventing productivity loss. Regardless of work sector or occupation, both health and wealth were emphasized as important parameters and considered as somewhat interrelated. However, a large fraction of the European worker force lacks information on effective measures to mitigate occupational heat stress. List of abbreviations: OH-Stress: Occupational heat stress; WBGT: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8409781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84097812021-09-02 Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries Morris, Nathan B. Levi, Miriam Morabito, Marco Messeri, Alessandro Ioannou, Leonidas G. Flouris, Andreas D. Samoutis, George Pogačar, Tjaša Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež Piil, Jacob F. Nybo, Lars Temperature (Austin) Research Paper Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end-users are not well elucidated. We therefore arranged two series of meetings with stakeholders to identify knowledge gaps, receive feedback on proposed cooling interventions, and discuss factors affecting implementation of heat-health interventions. This included four meetings attended by employers, employees, and health and safety officers (n = 41), and three meetings attended primarily by policy makers (n = 74), with feedback obtained via qualitative and quantitative questionnaires and focus group discussions. On a 10-point scale, both employers and employees valued worker safety (9.1 ± 1.8; mean±SD) and health (8.5 ± 1.9) as more important than protecting company profits (6.3 ± 2.3). Of the respondents, 41% were unaware of any cooling strategies at their company and of those who were aware, only 30% thought the interventions were effective. Following presentation of proposed interventions, the respondents rated “facilitated hydration”, “optimization of clothing/protective equipment”, and “rescheduling of work tasks” as the top-three preferred solutions. The main barriers for adopting cooling interventions were cost, feasibility, employer perceptions, and legislation. In conclusion, preventing negative health and safety effects was deemed to be more important than preventing productivity loss. Regardless of work sector or occupation, both health and wealth were emphasized as important parameters and considered as somewhat interrelated. However, a large fraction of the European worker force lacks information on effective measures to mitigate occupational heat stress. List of abbreviations: OH-Stress: Occupational heat stress; WBGT: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature Taylor & Francis 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8409781/ /pubmed/34485621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Morris, Nathan B.
Levi, Miriam
Morabito, Marco
Messeri, Alessandro
Ioannou, Leonidas G.
Flouris, Andreas D.
Samoutis, George
Pogačar, Tjaša
Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež
Piil, Jacob F.
Nybo, Lars
Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries
title Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries
title_full Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries
title_fullStr Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries
title_full_unstemmed Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries
title_short Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries
title_sort health vs. wealth: employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple european industries
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisnathanb healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT levimiriam healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT morabitomarco healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT messerialessandro healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT ioannouleonidasg healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT flourisandreasd healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT samoutisgeorge healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT pogacartjasa healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT bogatajluckakajfez healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT piiljacobf healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries
AT nybolars healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries