Cargando…
Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries
Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049 |
_version_ | 1783747049905192960 |
---|---|
author | Morris, Nathan B. Levi, Miriam Morabito, Marco Messeri, Alessandro Ioannou, Leonidas G. Flouris, Andreas D. Samoutis, George Pogačar, Tjaša Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež Piil, Jacob F. Nybo, Lars |
author_facet | Morris, Nathan B. Levi, Miriam Morabito, Marco Messeri, Alessandro Ioannou, Leonidas G. Flouris, Andreas D. Samoutis, George Pogačar, Tjaša Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež Piil, Jacob F. Nybo, Lars |
author_sort | Morris, Nathan B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end-users are not well elucidated. We therefore arranged two series of meetings with stakeholders to identify knowledge gaps, receive feedback on proposed cooling interventions, and discuss factors affecting implementation of heat-health interventions. This included four meetings attended by employers, employees, and health and safety officers (n = 41), and three meetings attended primarily by policy makers (n = 74), with feedback obtained via qualitative and quantitative questionnaires and focus group discussions. On a 10-point scale, both employers and employees valued worker safety (9.1 ± 1.8; mean±SD) and health (8.5 ± 1.9) as more important than protecting company profits (6.3 ± 2.3). Of the respondents, 41% were unaware of any cooling strategies at their company and of those who were aware, only 30% thought the interventions were effective. Following presentation of proposed interventions, the respondents rated “facilitated hydration”, “optimization of clothing/protective equipment”, and “rescheduling of work tasks” as the top-three preferred solutions. The main barriers for adopting cooling interventions were cost, feasibility, employer perceptions, and legislation. In conclusion, preventing negative health and safety effects was deemed to be more important than preventing productivity loss. Regardless of work sector or occupation, both health and wealth were emphasized as important parameters and considered as somewhat interrelated. However, a large fraction of the European worker force lacks information on effective measures to mitigate occupational heat stress. List of abbreviations: OH-Stress: Occupational heat stress; WBGT: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8409781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84097812021-09-02 Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries Morris, Nathan B. Levi, Miriam Morabito, Marco Messeri, Alessandro Ioannou, Leonidas G. Flouris, Andreas D. Samoutis, George Pogačar, Tjaša Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež Piil, Jacob F. Nybo, Lars Temperature (Austin) Research Paper Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end-users are not well elucidated. We therefore arranged two series of meetings with stakeholders to identify knowledge gaps, receive feedback on proposed cooling interventions, and discuss factors affecting implementation of heat-health interventions. This included four meetings attended by employers, employees, and health and safety officers (n = 41), and three meetings attended primarily by policy makers (n = 74), with feedback obtained via qualitative and quantitative questionnaires and focus group discussions. On a 10-point scale, both employers and employees valued worker safety (9.1 ± 1.8; mean±SD) and health (8.5 ± 1.9) as more important than protecting company profits (6.3 ± 2.3). Of the respondents, 41% were unaware of any cooling strategies at their company and of those who were aware, only 30% thought the interventions were effective. Following presentation of proposed interventions, the respondents rated “facilitated hydration”, “optimization of clothing/protective equipment”, and “rescheduling of work tasks” as the top-three preferred solutions. The main barriers for adopting cooling interventions were cost, feasibility, employer perceptions, and legislation. In conclusion, preventing negative health and safety effects was deemed to be more important than preventing productivity loss. Regardless of work sector or occupation, both health and wealth were emphasized as important parameters and considered as somewhat interrelated. However, a large fraction of the European worker force lacks information on effective measures to mitigate occupational heat stress. List of abbreviations: OH-Stress: Occupational heat stress; WBGT: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature Taylor & Francis 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8409781/ /pubmed/34485621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Morris, Nathan B. Levi, Miriam Morabito, Marco Messeri, Alessandro Ioannou, Leonidas G. Flouris, Andreas D. Samoutis, George Pogačar, Tjaša Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež Piil, Jacob F. Nybo, Lars Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries |
title | Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries |
title_full | Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries |
title_fullStr | Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries |
title_full_unstemmed | Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries |
title_short | Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries |
title_sort | health vs. wealth: employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple european industries |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrisnathanb healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT levimiriam healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT morabitomarco healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT messerialessandro healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT ioannouleonidasg healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT flourisandreasd healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT samoutisgeorge healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT pogacartjasa healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT bogatajluckakajfez healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT piiljacobf healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries AT nybolars healthvswealthemployeremployeeandpolicymakerperspectivesonoccupationalheatstressacrossmultipleeuropeanindustries |