Cargando…
Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Early detection of fall risk is crucial for targeted fall prevention and rehabilitation. This systematic review facilitates decision-making concerning the optimal choice for a suitable fall risk assessment test for older persons in four different settings. This systematic revi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483656 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S322506 |
_version_ | 1783747050842619904 |
---|---|
author | Gafner, Simone Chantal Allet, Lara Hilfiker, Roger Bastiaenen, Caroline Henrice Germaine |
author_facet | Gafner, Simone Chantal Allet, Lara Hilfiker, Roger Bastiaenen, Caroline Henrice Germaine |
author_sort | Gafner, Simone Chantal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Early detection of fall risk is crucial for targeted fall prevention and rehabilitation. This systematic review facilitates decision-making concerning the optimal choice for a suitable fall risk assessment test for older persons in four different settings. This systematic review provides an overview of reliability and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity [SE], specificity, likelihood ratios, and post-test probabilities) of commonly used performance measures to assess older persons’ fall risk. METHODS: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of all articles identified through a systematic search on the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality was critically appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and the COSMIN risk of bias tool. Due to a setting-dependent fall risk, four relevant settings were selected for the analyses: 1) community dwelling, 2) nursing home, 3) hospital, and 4) the combined setting of hospitalized and community-dwelling persons. RESULTS: Recommendations for diagnostic accuracy can be made for the specific settings: setting 1) mini-balance evaluation system test, timed up and go test with fast speed (TUG FAST), cognitive TUG FAST, functional reach test, and fast gait speed; 2) TUG at usual speed; 3) none of the included tests; and 4) some hip muscle strength and hand grip strength tests might be recommended. CONCLUSION: The review’s results are applicable for use in clinical practice, both on a population and on an individual level for patients and caregivers. Most measures’ reliability is sufficient. However, the included tests’ discriminative ability is not optimal for clinical use in relevant settings. The low sample sizes of most of the included studies and a limited amount of studies in all but the community-dwelling setting hinder us from making strong recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8409789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84097892021-09-02 Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review Gafner, Simone Chantal Allet, Lara Hilfiker, Roger Bastiaenen, Caroline Henrice Germaine Clin Interv Aging Review BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Early detection of fall risk is crucial for targeted fall prevention and rehabilitation. This systematic review facilitates decision-making concerning the optimal choice for a suitable fall risk assessment test for older persons in four different settings. This systematic review provides an overview of reliability and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity [SE], specificity, likelihood ratios, and post-test probabilities) of commonly used performance measures to assess older persons’ fall risk. METHODS: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of all articles identified through a systematic search on the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality was critically appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and the COSMIN risk of bias tool. Due to a setting-dependent fall risk, four relevant settings were selected for the analyses: 1) community dwelling, 2) nursing home, 3) hospital, and 4) the combined setting of hospitalized and community-dwelling persons. RESULTS: Recommendations for diagnostic accuracy can be made for the specific settings: setting 1) mini-balance evaluation system test, timed up and go test with fast speed (TUG FAST), cognitive TUG FAST, functional reach test, and fast gait speed; 2) TUG at usual speed; 3) none of the included tests; and 4) some hip muscle strength and hand grip strength tests might be recommended. CONCLUSION: The review’s results are applicable for use in clinical practice, both on a population and on an individual level for patients and caregivers. Most measures’ reliability is sufficient. However, the included tests’ discriminative ability is not optimal for clinical use in relevant settings. The low sample sizes of most of the included studies and a limited amount of studies in all but the community-dwelling setting hinder us from making strong recommendations. Dove 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8409789/ /pubmed/34483656 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S322506 Text en © 2021 Gafner et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Gafner, Simone Chantal Allet, Lara Hilfiker, Roger Bastiaenen, Caroline Henrice Germaine Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review |
title | Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | reliability and diagnostic accuracy of commonly used performance tests relative to fall history in older persons: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483656 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S322506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gafnersimonechantal reliabilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofcommonlyusedperformancetestsrelativetofallhistoryinolderpersonsasystematicreview AT alletlara reliabilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofcommonlyusedperformancetestsrelativetofallhistoryinolderpersonsasystematicreview AT hilfikerroger reliabilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofcommonlyusedperformancetestsrelativetofallhistoryinolderpersonsasystematicreview AT bastiaenencarolinehenricegermaine reliabilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofcommonlyusedperformancetestsrelativetofallhistoryinolderpersonsasystematicreview |