Cargando…

Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Early detection of fall risk is crucial for targeted fall prevention and rehabilitation. This systematic review facilitates decision-making concerning the optimal choice for a suitable fall risk assessment test for older persons in four different settings. This systematic revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gafner, Simone Chantal, Allet, Lara, Hilfiker, Roger, Bastiaenen, Caroline Henrice Germaine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483656
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S322506
_version_ 1783747050842619904
author Gafner, Simone Chantal
Allet, Lara
Hilfiker, Roger
Bastiaenen, Caroline Henrice Germaine
author_facet Gafner, Simone Chantal
Allet, Lara
Hilfiker, Roger
Bastiaenen, Caroline Henrice Germaine
author_sort Gafner, Simone Chantal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Early detection of fall risk is crucial for targeted fall prevention and rehabilitation. This systematic review facilitates decision-making concerning the optimal choice for a suitable fall risk assessment test for older persons in four different settings. This systematic review provides an overview of reliability and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity [SE], specificity, likelihood ratios, and post-test probabilities) of commonly used performance measures to assess older persons’ fall risk. METHODS: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of all articles identified through a systematic search on the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality was critically appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and the COSMIN risk of bias tool. Due to a setting-dependent fall risk, four relevant settings were selected for the analyses: 1) community dwelling, 2) nursing home, 3) hospital, and 4) the combined setting of hospitalized and community-dwelling persons. RESULTS: Recommendations for diagnostic accuracy can be made for the specific settings: setting 1) mini-balance evaluation system test, timed up and go test with fast speed (TUG FAST), cognitive TUG FAST, functional reach test, and fast gait speed; 2) TUG at usual speed; 3) none of the included tests; and 4) some hip muscle strength and hand grip strength tests might be recommended. CONCLUSION: The review’s results are applicable for use in clinical practice, both on a population and on an individual level for patients and caregivers. Most measures’ reliability is sufficient. However, the included tests’ discriminative ability is not optimal for clinical use in relevant settings. The low sample sizes of most of the included studies and a limited amount of studies in all but the community-dwelling setting hinder us from making strong recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8409789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84097892021-09-02 Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review Gafner, Simone Chantal Allet, Lara Hilfiker, Roger Bastiaenen, Caroline Henrice Germaine Clin Interv Aging Review BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Early detection of fall risk is crucial for targeted fall prevention and rehabilitation. This systematic review facilitates decision-making concerning the optimal choice for a suitable fall risk assessment test for older persons in four different settings. This systematic review provides an overview of reliability and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity [SE], specificity, likelihood ratios, and post-test probabilities) of commonly used performance measures to assess older persons’ fall risk. METHODS: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of all articles identified through a systematic search on the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality was critically appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and the COSMIN risk of bias tool. Due to a setting-dependent fall risk, four relevant settings were selected for the analyses: 1) community dwelling, 2) nursing home, 3) hospital, and 4) the combined setting of hospitalized and community-dwelling persons. RESULTS: Recommendations for diagnostic accuracy can be made for the specific settings: setting 1) mini-balance evaluation system test, timed up and go test with fast speed (TUG FAST), cognitive TUG FAST, functional reach test, and fast gait speed; 2) TUG at usual speed; 3) none of the included tests; and 4) some hip muscle strength and hand grip strength tests might be recommended. CONCLUSION: The review’s results are applicable for use in clinical practice, both on a population and on an individual level for patients and caregivers. Most measures’ reliability is sufficient. However, the included tests’ discriminative ability is not optimal for clinical use in relevant settings. The low sample sizes of most of the included studies and a limited amount of studies in all but the community-dwelling setting hinder us from making strong recommendations. Dove 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8409789/ /pubmed/34483656 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S322506 Text en © 2021 Gafner et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Gafner, Simone Chantal
Allet, Lara
Hilfiker, Roger
Bastiaenen, Caroline Henrice Germaine
Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review
title Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review
title_full Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review
title_short Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review
title_sort reliability and diagnostic accuracy of commonly used performance tests relative to fall history in older persons: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8409789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483656
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S322506
work_keys_str_mv AT gafnersimonechantal reliabilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofcommonlyusedperformancetestsrelativetofallhistoryinolderpersonsasystematicreview
AT alletlara reliabilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofcommonlyusedperformancetestsrelativetofallhistoryinolderpersonsasystematicreview
AT hilfikerroger reliabilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofcommonlyusedperformancetestsrelativetofallhistoryinolderpersonsasystematicreview
AT bastiaenencarolinehenricegermaine reliabilityanddiagnosticaccuracyofcommonlyusedperformancetestsrelativetofallhistoryinolderpersonsasystematicreview