Cargando…

Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action

When dogs interact with humans, they often show appropriate reactions to human intentional action. But it is unclear from these everyday observations whether the dogs simply respond to the action outcomes or whether they are able to discriminate between different categories of actions. Are dogs able...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schünemann, Britta, Keller, Judith, Rakoczy, Hannes, Behne, Tanya, Bräuer, Juliane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8410798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94374-3
_version_ 1783747175006601216
author Schünemann, Britta
Keller, Judith
Rakoczy, Hannes
Behne, Tanya
Bräuer, Juliane
author_facet Schünemann, Britta
Keller, Judith
Rakoczy, Hannes
Behne, Tanya
Bräuer, Juliane
author_sort Schünemann, Britta
collection PubMed
description When dogs interact with humans, they often show appropriate reactions to human intentional action. But it is unclear from these everyday observations whether the dogs simply respond to the action outcomes or whether they are able to discriminate between different categories of actions. Are dogs able to distinguish intentional human actions from unintentional ones, even when the action outcomes are the same? We tested dogs’ ability to discriminate these action categories by adapting the so-called “Unwilling vs. Unable” paradigm. This paradigm compares subjects’ reactions to intentional and unintentional human behaviour. All dogs received three conditions: In the unwilling-condition, an experimenter intentionally withheld a reward from them. In the two unable-conditions, she unintentionally withheld the reward, either because she was clumsy or because she was physically prevented from giving the reward to the dog. Dogs clearly distinguished in their spontaneous behaviour between unwilling- and unable-conditions. This indicates that dogs indeed distinguish intentional actions from unintentional behaviour. We critically discuss our findings with regard to dogs’ understanding of human intentional action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8410798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84107982021-09-03 Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action Schünemann, Britta Keller, Judith Rakoczy, Hannes Behne, Tanya Bräuer, Juliane Sci Rep Article When dogs interact with humans, they often show appropriate reactions to human intentional action. But it is unclear from these everyday observations whether the dogs simply respond to the action outcomes or whether they are able to discriminate between different categories of actions. Are dogs able to distinguish intentional human actions from unintentional ones, even when the action outcomes are the same? We tested dogs’ ability to discriminate these action categories by adapting the so-called “Unwilling vs. Unable” paradigm. This paradigm compares subjects’ reactions to intentional and unintentional human behaviour. All dogs received three conditions: In the unwilling-condition, an experimenter intentionally withheld a reward from them. In the two unable-conditions, she unintentionally withheld the reward, either because she was clumsy or because she was physically prevented from giving the reward to the dog. Dogs clearly distinguished in their spontaneous behaviour between unwilling- and unable-conditions. This indicates that dogs indeed distinguish intentional actions from unintentional behaviour. We critically discuss our findings with regard to dogs’ understanding of human intentional action. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8410798/ /pubmed/34471153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94374-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schünemann, Britta
Keller, Judith
Rakoczy, Hannes
Behne, Tanya
Bräuer, Juliane
Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action
title Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action
title_full Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action
title_fullStr Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action
title_full_unstemmed Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action
title_short Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action
title_sort dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8410798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34471153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94374-3
work_keys_str_mv AT schunemannbritta dogsdistinguishhumanintentionalandunintentionalaction
AT kellerjudith dogsdistinguishhumanintentionalandunintentionalaction
AT rakoczyhannes dogsdistinguishhumanintentionalandunintentionalaction
AT behnetanya dogsdistinguishhumanintentionalandunintentionalaction
AT brauerjuliane dogsdistinguishhumanintentionalandunintentionalaction