Cargando…

The effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus

BACKGROUND: Stem size is an important element for successful time zero primary fixation of a press-fit humeral stem in shoulder arthroplasty. Little basic science research, however, has been conducted on the effects of implant thickness and canal fill on load transfer, contact, and stress shielding....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Synnott, Stephanie, Langohr, G. Daniel G., Reeves, Jacob M., Johnson, James A., Athwal, George S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34505100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.006
_version_ 1783747227457421312
author Synnott, Stephanie
Langohr, G. Daniel G.
Reeves, Jacob M.
Johnson, James A.
Athwal, George S.
author_facet Synnott, Stephanie
Langohr, G. Daniel G.
Reeves, Jacob M.
Johnson, James A.
Athwal, George S.
author_sort Synnott, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stem size is an important element for successful time zero primary fixation of a press-fit humeral stem in shoulder arthroplasty. Little basic science research, however, has been conducted on the effects of implant thickness and canal fill on load transfer, contact, and stress shielding. The purpose of this finite element study was to determine the effects of varying stem thickness on bone contact, bone stresses, and bone resorption owing to stress shielding. METHODS: Three generic short-stem implant models were developed and varied based on cross-sectional thickness (thinner – 8 mm, medium – 12 mm, thicker – 16 mm). Using a finite element model, three outcome measures were determined (1) the amount of bone-to-implant contact, (2) changes in cortical and trabecular bone stresses from the intact state, and (3) changes in cortical and trabecular strain energy densities which can predict bone remodeling or stress shielding. RESULTS: Increasing the size of the humeral stem had no significant effects on bone-to-implant contact during loading (P > .07). The thinner implant with the lowest canal fill ratio produced significantly lower changes in stress from the intact state in both cortical and trabecular bone (P < .002). In addition, the thinner implant resulted in a substantially lower volume of bone predicted to stress shield and resorb when compared with the medium and thicker stems. DISCUSSION: The results demonstrate that thinner implants and lower canal fill may be beneficial over thicker sizes, provided equal initial fixation can be achieved. The thinner implant has a greater degree of load sharing and increases the mechanical load placed on surrounding bone, reducing the risk of stress shielding and bone resorption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8411059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84110592021-09-08 The effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus Synnott, Stephanie Langohr, G. Daniel G. Reeves, Jacob M. Johnson, James A. Athwal, George S. JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Stem size is an important element for successful time zero primary fixation of a press-fit humeral stem in shoulder arthroplasty. Little basic science research, however, has been conducted on the effects of implant thickness and canal fill on load transfer, contact, and stress shielding. The purpose of this finite element study was to determine the effects of varying stem thickness on bone contact, bone stresses, and bone resorption owing to stress shielding. METHODS: Three generic short-stem implant models were developed and varied based on cross-sectional thickness (thinner – 8 mm, medium – 12 mm, thicker – 16 mm). Using a finite element model, three outcome measures were determined (1) the amount of bone-to-implant contact, (2) changes in cortical and trabecular bone stresses from the intact state, and (3) changes in cortical and trabecular strain energy densities which can predict bone remodeling or stress shielding. RESULTS: Increasing the size of the humeral stem had no significant effects on bone-to-implant contact during loading (P > .07). The thinner implant with the lowest canal fill ratio produced significantly lower changes in stress from the intact state in both cortical and trabecular bone (P < .002). In addition, the thinner implant resulted in a substantially lower volume of bone predicted to stress shield and resorb when compared with the medium and thicker stems. DISCUSSION: The results demonstrate that thinner implants and lower canal fill may be beneficial over thicker sizes, provided equal initial fixation can be achieved. The thinner implant has a greater degree of load sharing and increases the mechanical load placed on surrounding bone, reducing the risk of stress shielding and bone resorption. Elsevier 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8411059/ /pubmed/34505100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.006 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Synnott, Stephanie
Langohr, G. Daniel G.
Reeves, Jacob M.
Johnson, James A.
Athwal, George S.
The effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus
title The effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus
title_full The effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus
title_fullStr The effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus
title_full_unstemmed The effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus
title_short The effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus
title_sort effect of humeral implant thickness and canal fill on interface contact and bone stresses in the proximal humerus
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34505100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.006
work_keys_str_mv AT synnottstephanie theeffectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus
AT langohrgdanielg theeffectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus
AT reevesjacobm theeffectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus
AT johnsonjamesa theeffectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus
AT athwalgeorges theeffectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus
AT synnottstephanie effectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus
AT langohrgdanielg effectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus
AT reevesjacobm effectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus
AT johnsonjamesa effectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus
AT athwalgeorges effectofhumeralimplantthicknessandcanalfilloninterfacecontactandbonestressesintheproximalhumerus