Cargando…

The ultrasonographic assessment of the morphologic changes in the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel in Japanese volunteers: relationship between dynamic ulnar nerve instability and clinical symptoms

BACKGROUND: We investigated the differences in the prevalence of ulnar nerve instability (UNI) by hand dominance and evaluated the relationship between UNI and morphologic changes in the ulnar nerve and the clinical findings and upper limb function. METHODS: This study examined 153 healthy participa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Endo, Fumitaka, Tajika, Tsuyoshi, Kuboi, Takuro, Shinagawa, Satoshi, Tsukui, Toshiki, Nakajima, Tomoki, Kogure, Yusuke, Chikuda, Hirotaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34505110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.05.005
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We investigated the differences in the prevalence of ulnar nerve instability (UNI) by hand dominance and evaluated the relationship between UNI and morphologic changes in the ulnar nerve and the clinical findings and upper limb function. METHODS: This study examined 153 healthy participants (n = 306 elbows; 44 men, 112 women; mean age 65.4 years) who underwent ultrasonography to assess the ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (UNCSA) at three points of the bilateral cubital tunnel at 30° of elbow flexion. Participants were divided into three groups based on the ultrasonography findings of UNI: no instability (type N), subluxation (type S), and dislocation (type D). For the dominant and nondominant sides, we assessed the relationship between the UNCSA and clinical factors, including the age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, fat mass, grip strength, key pinch strength, UNCSA, and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation score. RESULTS: We identified 75 cases without instability in both elbows and 78 cases with some instability. The prevalence of UNI was 51%. No significant difference was found between hand dominance and the prevalence of UNI. The UNCSA at 1 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle on the bilateral sides in type S was the most increased among three types. CONCLUSION: UNI was identified in almost half of the participants, with no marked difference found in the hand dominance. The UNCSA at 1 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle was significantly increased the most in type S. UNI does not appear to be associated with elbow symptoms in the general population.