Cargando…
A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis
BACKGROUND: Failed mitral bioprosthesis has conventionally been treated with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TM-VIVI) is emerging as an alternative to SMVR in high-risk patients. We report our experience with transapical TM-VIVI using...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527343 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-975 |
_version_ | 1783747247519825920 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Peijian Ma, Jiexu Tan, Tong Xie, Nianjin Chen, Zhao Zhang, Yuyuan Liu, Yanjun Wu, Hongxiang Chen, Jimei Zhuang, Jian Liu, Jian Guo, Huiming |
author_facet | Wei, Peijian Ma, Jiexu Tan, Tong Xie, Nianjin Chen, Zhao Zhang, Yuyuan Liu, Yanjun Wu, Hongxiang Chen, Jimei Zhuang, Jian Liu, Jian Guo, Huiming |
author_sort | Wei, Peijian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Failed mitral bioprosthesis has conventionally been treated with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TM-VIVI) is emerging as an alternative to SMVR in high-risk patients. We report our experience with transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system. METHODS: From May 2020 to January 2021, 21 patients with a failed mitral bioprosthesis underwent transapical TM-VIVI without concomitant procedures at Guangdong Provincial People’s hospital. The mean age was 74.62 years. All patients were heavily symptomatic with severe mitral regurgitation and increased trans-prosthetic gradient. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (STS PROM) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroScore II) scores were used and predicted high mortality (STS PROM, 12.91%±9.94%; EuroScore II, 12.04%±10.5%). All the procedures were performed in a hybrid room. RESULTS: The success rate was 100% with no conversion to median sternotomy and no intraprocedural death. The mean ventilation time and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were 25±21.44 minutes and 4.14±7.08 days, respectively. No major postoperative complications were observed, except 1 patient suffered pneumonia and required tracheostomy. All patients recovered well. Postoperative echocardiography revealed excellent hemodynamics with no residual mitral regurgitation in 19 patients and mild regurgitation in 2 patients. In a subgroup analysis, no significant differences among procedural and postoperative outcomes were detected in patients with previous aortic-mitral double valve replacement (DVR) compared to other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the safety and feasibility of transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system, even in patients following DVR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8411171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84111712021-09-14 A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis Wei, Peijian Ma, Jiexu Tan, Tong Xie, Nianjin Chen, Zhao Zhang, Yuyuan Liu, Yanjun Wu, Hongxiang Chen, Jimei Zhuang, Jian Liu, Jian Guo, Huiming J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Failed mitral bioprosthesis has conventionally been treated with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TM-VIVI) is emerging as an alternative to SMVR in high-risk patients. We report our experience with transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system. METHODS: From May 2020 to January 2021, 21 patients with a failed mitral bioprosthesis underwent transapical TM-VIVI without concomitant procedures at Guangdong Provincial People’s hospital. The mean age was 74.62 years. All patients were heavily symptomatic with severe mitral regurgitation and increased trans-prosthetic gradient. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (STS PROM) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroScore II) scores were used and predicted high mortality (STS PROM, 12.91%±9.94%; EuroScore II, 12.04%±10.5%). All the procedures were performed in a hybrid room. RESULTS: The success rate was 100% with no conversion to median sternotomy and no intraprocedural death. The mean ventilation time and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were 25±21.44 minutes and 4.14±7.08 days, respectively. No major postoperative complications were observed, except 1 patient suffered pneumonia and required tracheostomy. All patients recovered well. Postoperative echocardiography revealed excellent hemodynamics with no residual mitral regurgitation in 19 patients and mild regurgitation in 2 patients. In a subgroup analysis, no significant differences among procedural and postoperative outcomes were detected in patients with previous aortic-mitral double valve replacement (DVR) compared to other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the safety and feasibility of transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system, even in patients following DVR. AME Publishing Company 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8411171/ /pubmed/34527343 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-975 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wei, Peijian Ma, Jiexu Tan, Tong Xie, Nianjin Chen, Zhao Zhang, Yuyuan Liu, Yanjun Wu, Hongxiang Chen, Jimei Zhuang, Jian Liu, Jian Guo, Huiming A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis |
title | A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis |
title_full | A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis |
title_fullStr | A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis |
title_short | A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis |
title_sort | novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using j-valve for failed bioprosthesis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527343 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weipeijian anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT majiexu anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT tantong anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT xienianjin anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT chenzhao anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT zhangyuyuan anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT liuyanjun anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT wuhongxiang anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT chenjimei anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT zhuangjian anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT liujian anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT guohuiming anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT weipeijian novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT majiexu novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT tantong novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT xienianjin novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT chenzhao novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT zhangyuyuan novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT liuyanjun novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT wuhongxiang novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT chenjimei novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT zhuangjian novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT liujian novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis AT guohuiming novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis |