Cargando…

A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND: Failed mitral bioprosthesis has conventionally been treated with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TM-VIVI) is emerging as an alternative to SMVR in high-risk patients. We report our experience with transapical TM-VIVI using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Peijian, Ma, Jiexu, Tan, Tong, Xie, Nianjin, Chen, Zhao, Zhang, Yuyuan, Liu, Yanjun, Wu, Hongxiang, Chen, Jimei, Zhuang, Jian, Liu, Jian, Guo, Huiming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527343
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-975
_version_ 1783747247519825920
author Wei, Peijian
Ma, Jiexu
Tan, Tong
Xie, Nianjin
Chen, Zhao
Zhang, Yuyuan
Liu, Yanjun
Wu, Hongxiang
Chen, Jimei
Zhuang, Jian
Liu, Jian
Guo, Huiming
author_facet Wei, Peijian
Ma, Jiexu
Tan, Tong
Xie, Nianjin
Chen, Zhao
Zhang, Yuyuan
Liu, Yanjun
Wu, Hongxiang
Chen, Jimei
Zhuang, Jian
Liu, Jian
Guo, Huiming
author_sort Wei, Peijian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Failed mitral bioprosthesis has conventionally been treated with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TM-VIVI) is emerging as an alternative to SMVR in high-risk patients. We report our experience with transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system. METHODS: From May 2020 to January 2021, 21 patients with a failed mitral bioprosthesis underwent transapical TM-VIVI without concomitant procedures at Guangdong Provincial People’s hospital. The mean age was 74.62 years. All patients were heavily symptomatic with severe mitral regurgitation and increased trans-prosthetic gradient. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (STS PROM) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroScore II) scores were used and predicted high mortality (STS PROM, 12.91%±9.94%; EuroScore II, 12.04%±10.5%). All the procedures were performed in a hybrid room. RESULTS: The success rate was 100% with no conversion to median sternotomy and no intraprocedural death. The mean ventilation time and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were 25±21.44 minutes and 4.14±7.08 days, respectively. No major postoperative complications were observed, except 1 patient suffered pneumonia and required tracheostomy. All patients recovered well. Postoperative echocardiography revealed excellent hemodynamics with no residual mitral regurgitation in 19 patients and mild regurgitation in 2 patients. In a subgroup analysis, no significant differences among procedural and postoperative outcomes were detected in patients with previous aortic-mitral double valve replacement (DVR) compared to other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the safety and feasibility of transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system, even in patients following DVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8411171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84111712021-09-14 A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis Wei, Peijian Ma, Jiexu Tan, Tong Xie, Nianjin Chen, Zhao Zhang, Yuyuan Liu, Yanjun Wu, Hongxiang Chen, Jimei Zhuang, Jian Liu, Jian Guo, Huiming J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Failed mitral bioprosthesis has conventionally been treated with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation (TM-VIVI) is emerging as an alternative to SMVR in high-risk patients. We report our experience with transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system. METHODS: From May 2020 to January 2021, 21 patients with a failed mitral bioprosthesis underwent transapical TM-VIVI without concomitant procedures at Guangdong Provincial People’s hospital. The mean age was 74.62 years. All patients were heavily symptomatic with severe mitral regurgitation and increased trans-prosthetic gradient. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (STS PROM) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroScore II) scores were used and predicted high mortality (STS PROM, 12.91%±9.94%; EuroScore II, 12.04%±10.5%). All the procedures were performed in a hybrid room. RESULTS: The success rate was 100% with no conversion to median sternotomy and no intraprocedural death. The mean ventilation time and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were 25±21.44 minutes and 4.14±7.08 days, respectively. No major postoperative complications were observed, except 1 patient suffered pneumonia and required tracheostomy. All patients recovered well. Postoperative echocardiography revealed excellent hemodynamics with no residual mitral regurgitation in 19 patients and mild regurgitation in 2 patients. In a subgroup analysis, no significant differences among procedural and postoperative outcomes were detected in patients with previous aortic-mitral double valve replacement (DVR) compared to other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the safety and feasibility of transapical TM-VIVI using the J-Valve system, even in patients following DVR. AME Publishing Company 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8411171/ /pubmed/34527343 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-975 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wei, Peijian
Ma, Jiexu
Tan, Tong
Xie, Nianjin
Chen, Zhao
Zhang, Yuyuan
Liu, Yanjun
Wu, Hongxiang
Chen, Jimei
Zhuang, Jian
Liu, Jian
Guo, Huiming
A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis
title A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis
title_full A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis
title_fullStr A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis
title_full_unstemmed A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis
title_short A novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using J-Valve for failed bioprosthesis
title_sort novel alternative: transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation using j-valve for failed bioprosthesis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527343
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-975
work_keys_str_mv AT weipeijian anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT majiexu anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT tantong anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT xienianjin anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT chenzhao anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT zhangyuyuan anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT liuyanjun anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT wuhongxiang anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT chenjimei anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT zhuangjian anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT liujian anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT guohuiming anovelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT weipeijian novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT majiexu novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT tantong novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT xienianjin novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT chenzhao novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT zhangyuyuan novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT liuyanjun novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT wuhongxiang novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT chenjimei novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT zhuangjian novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT liujian novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis
AT guohuiming novelalternativetransapicaltranscathetermitralvalveinvalveimplantationusingjvalveforfailedbioprosthesis