Cargando…
Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE neo in the CHANGE neo TA study
BACKGROUND: A transapical (TA) approach to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be used when a transfemoral (TF) approach is not feasible. The CHANGE neo TA study evaluated patients treated in routine clinical practice via TA-TAVR with the ACURATE neo bioprosthetic aortic valve. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100862 |
_version_ | 1783747257713033216 |
---|---|
author | Holzamer, Andreas Doss, Mirko Schramm, Rene Diegeler, Anno Conradi, Lenard Strauch, Justus Holzhey, David Erlebach, Magdalena Schröfel, Holger Arsalan, Mani Allocco, Dominic J Hilker, Michael |
author_facet | Holzamer, Andreas Doss, Mirko Schramm, Rene Diegeler, Anno Conradi, Lenard Strauch, Justus Holzhey, David Erlebach, Magdalena Schröfel, Holger Arsalan, Mani Allocco, Dominic J Hilker, Michael |
author_sort | Holzamer, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A transapical (TA) approach to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be used when a transfemoral (TF) approach is not feasible. The CHANGE neo TA study evaluated patients treated in routine clinical practice via TA-TAVR with the ACURATE neo bioprosthetic aortic valve. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-arm post-market study had a planned enrolment of 200 subjects; enrolment was terminated early due to declining TA-TAVR procedures at participating centers. Final enrolment was 107 patients (mean age: 79.3 years; 54.2% female; mean STS score at baseline: 6.2%). The mortality rate in the intent-to-treat population was 11.2% at 30 days (primary endpoint) and 25.6% at 12 months. The VARC-2 composite endpoint for 30-day safety occurred in 24.3% of patients. Six patients (5.6%) received a permanent pacemaker within 30 days. Site-reported echocardiographic data showed early improvements in mean aortic valve gradient (baseline: 38.8 [SD 13.1] mmHg, discharge: 6.7 [SD 3.7] mmHg) and effective orifice area (baseline: 0.7 [SD 0.2] cm(2), discharge: 1.9 [SD 0.6] cm(2)), and the discharge rate of paravalvular regurgitation was low (74.7% none/trace, 24.2% mild, 1.1% severe). CONCLUSIONS: TA-TAVR with the ACURATE neo valve system yields acceptable clinical outcomes, providing an alternative for patients with aortic stenosis who are not candidates for TF-TAVR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8411222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84112222021-09-08 Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE neo in the CHANGE neo TA study Holzamer, Andreas Doss, Mirko Schramm, Rene Diegeler, Anno Conradi, Lenard Strauch, Justus Holzhey, David Erlebach, Magdalena Schröfel, Holger Arsalan, Mani Allocco, Dominic J Hilker, Michael Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper BACKGROUND: A transapical (TA) approach to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be used when a transfemoral (TF) approach is not feasible. The CHANGE neo TA study evaluated patients treated in routine clinical practice via TA-TAVR with the ACURATE neo bioprosthetic aortic valve. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-arm post-market study had a planned enrolment of 200 subjects; enrolment was terminated early due to declining TA-TAVR procedures at participating centers. Final enrolment was 107 patients (mean age: 79.3 years; 54.2% female; mean STS score at baseline: 6.2%). The mortality rate in the intent-to-treat population was 11.2% at 30 days (primary endpoint) and 25.6% at 12 months. The VARC-2 composite endpoint for 30-day safety occurred in 24.3% of patients. Six patients (5.6%) received a permanent pacemaker within 30 days. Site-reported echocardiographic data showed early improvements in mean aortic valve gradient (baseline: 38.8 [SD 13.1] mmHg, discharge: 6.7 [SD 3.7] mmHg) and effective orifice area (baseline: 0.7 [SD 0.2] cm(2), discharge: 1.9 [SD 0.6] cm(2)), and the discharge rate of paravalvular regurgitation was low (74.7% none/trace, 24.2% mild, 1.1% severe). CONCLUSIONS: TA-TAVR with the ACURATE neo valve system yields acceptable clinical outcomes, providing an alternative for patients with aortic stenosis who are not candidates for TF-TAVR. Elsevier 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8411222/ /pubmed/34504944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100862 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Holzamer, Andreas Doss, Mirko Schramm, Rene Diegeler, Anno Conradi, Lenard Strauch, Justus Holzhey, David Erlebach, Magdalena Schröfel, Holger Arsalan, Mani Allocco, Dominic J Hilker, Michael Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE neo in the CHANGE neo TA study |
title | Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE neo in the CHANGE neo TA study |
title_full | Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE neo in the CHANGE neo TA study |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE neo in the CHANGE neo TA study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE neo in the CHANGE neo TA study |
title_short | Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE neo in the CHANGE neo TA study |
title_sort | clinical outcomes following transapical tavr with acurate neo in the change neo ta study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holzamerandreas clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT dossmirko clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT schrammrene clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT diegeleranno clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT conradilenard clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT strauchjustus clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT holzheydavid clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT erlebachmagdalena clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT schrofelholger clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT arsalanmani clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT alloccodominicj clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy AT hilkermichael clinicaloutcomesfollowingtransapicaltavrwithacurateneointhechangeneotastudy |