Cargando…

What does team science look like across the CTSA consortium? A qualitative analysis of the Great CTSA Team Science Contest submissions

INTRODUCTION: The Great CTSA Team Science Contest (GTSC) was developed to discover how Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs promote and support team science [1]. The purpose of this study was a secondary qualitative analysis of the GTSC submissions to better understand the diversity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelfrey, Clara M., Goldman, Ann S., DiazGranados, Deborah J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.812
_version_ 1783747267158605824
author Pelfrey, Clara M.
Goldman, Ann S.
DiazGranados, Deborah J.
author_facet Pelfrey, Clara M.
Goldman, Ann S.
DiazGranados, Deborah J.
author_sort Pelfrey, Clara M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Great CTSA Team Science Contest (GTSC) was developed to discover how Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs promote and support team science [1]. The purpose of this study was a secondary qualitative analysis of the GTSC submissions to better understand the diversity of team science initiatives across the CTSA consortium. METHODS: Secondary qualitative analysis of the GTSC data addressed the following research questions, which defined the top-level coding: (1) What CTSA component sponsored it? (2) Who was the team doing the work? (3) Who were the intended beneficiaries? (4) What was the intended outcome? (5) What strategies did they use? (6) What translational science (TS) stage was addressed? (7) How do they align with the NCATS team science strategic goals? (8) How do the CTSA’s team science efforts align with the National Academies Research Council (NRC) recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of team science? RESULTS: The GTSC received 170 submissions from 45 unique CTSA hubs. Qualitative analysis revealed a great variety of team science strategies for virtually all team science stakeholders. In addition to strategies to promote team science, results show successful examples that focus on outcomes and illustrate ways of measuring success. CONCLUSIONS: The GTSC shows that the CTSA consortium is involved in an extremely diverse array of team science activities, which align well with both the NRC recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of team science and the NCATS strategic goals for team science. Future research should evaluate the efficacy of team science strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8411266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84112662021-09-14 What does team science look like across the CTSA consortium? A qualitative analysis of the Great CTSA Team Science Contest submissions Pelfrey, Clara M. Goldman, Ann S. DiazGranados, Deborah J. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Great CTSA Team Science Contest (GTSC) was developed to discover how Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs promote and support team science [1]. The purpose of this study was a secondary qualitative analysis of the GTSC submissions to better understand the diversity of team science initiatives across the CTSA consortium. METHODS: Secondary qualitative analysis of the GTSC data addressed the following research questions, which defined the top-level coding: (1) What CTSA component sponsored it? (2) Who was the team doing the work? (3) Who were the intended beneficiaries? (4) What was the intended outcome? (5) What strategies did they use? (6) What translational science (TS) stage was addressed? (7) How do they align with the NCATS team science strategic goals? (8) How do the CTSA’s team science efforts align with the National Academies Research Council (NRC) recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of team science? RESULTS: The GTSC received 170 submissions from 45 unique CTSA hubs. Qualitative analysis revealed a great variety of team science strategies for virtually all team science stakeholders. In addition to strategies to promote team science, results show successful examples that focus on outcomes and illustrate ways of measuring success. CONCLUSIONS: The GTSC shows that the CTSA consortium is involved in an extremely diverse array of team science activities, which align well with both the NRC recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of team science and the NCATS strategic goals for team science. Future research should evaluate the efficacy of team science strategies. Cambridge University Press 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8411266/ /pubmed/34527293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.812 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pelfrey, Clara M.
Goldman, Ann S.
DiazGranados, Deborah J.
What does team science look like across the CTSA consortium? A qualitative analysis of the Great CTSA Team Science Contest submissions
title What does team science look like across the CTSA consortium? A qualitative analysis of the Great CTSA Team Science Contest submissions
title_full What does team science look like across the CTSA consortium? A qualitative analysis of the Great CTSA Team Science Contest submissions
title_fullStr What does team science look like across the CTSA consortium? A qualitative analysis of the Great CTSA Team Science Contest submissions
title_full_unstemmed What does team science look like across the CTSA consortium? A qualitative analysis of the Great CTSA Team Science Contest submissions
title_short What does team science look like across the CTSA consortium? A qualitative analysis of the Great CTSA Team Science Contest submissions
title_sort what does team science look like across the ctsa consortium? a qualitative analysis of the great ctsa team science contest submissions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.812
work_keys_str_mv AT pelfreyclaram whatdoesteamsciencelooklikeacrossthectsaconsortiumaqualitativeanalysisofthegreatctsateamsciencecontestsubmissions
AT goldmananns whatdoesteamsciencelooklikeacrossthectsaconsortiumaqualitativeanalysisofthegreatctsateamsciencecontestsubmissions
AT diazgranadosdeborahj whatdoesteamsciencelooklikeacrossthectsaconsortiumaqualitativeanalysisofthegreatctsateamsciencecontestsubmissions