Cargando…

Hip Muscle Strength Explains Only 11% of the Improvement in HAGOS With an Intersegmental Approach to Successful Rehabilitation of Athletic Groin Pain

BACKGROUND: Exercise-based rehabilitation targeting intersegmental control has high success rates and fast recovery times in the management of athletic groin pain (AGP). The influence of this approach on hip strength and lower limb reactive strength and how these measures compare with uninjured athl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baida, Samuel R., King, Enda, Richter, Chris, Gore, Shane, Franklyn-Miller, Andrew, Moran, Kieran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34398640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465211028981
_version_ 1783747301536169984
author Baida, Samuel R.
King, Enda
Richter, Chris
Gore, Shane
Franklyn-Miller, Andrew
Moran, Kieran
author_facet Baida, Samuel R.
King, Enda
Richter, Chris
Gore, Shane
Franklyn-Miller, Andrew
Moran, Kieran
author_sort Baida, Samuel R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exercise-based rehabilitation targeting intersegmental control has high success rates and fast recovery times in the management of athletic groin pain (AGP). The influence of this approach on hip strength and lower limb reactive strength and how these measures compare with uninjured athletes (CON) remain unknown. Additionally, the efficacy of this program after return to play (RTP) has not been examined. PURPOSE: First, to examine differences in isometric hip strength, reactive strength, and the Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) between the AGP and CON cohorts and after rehabilitation; second, to examine the relationship between the change in HAGOS and the change in strength variables after rehabilitation; last, to track HAGOS for 6 months after RTP. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 42 athletes diagnosed with AGP and 36 matched controls completed baseline testing: isometric hip strength, lower limb reactive strength, and HAGOS. After rehabilitation, athletes with AGP were retested, and HAGOS was collected at 3 and 6 months after RTP. RESULTS: In total, 36 athletes with AGP completed the program with an RTP time of 9.8 ± 3.0 weeks (mean ± SD). At baseline, these athletes had significantly lower isometric hip strength (abduction, adduction, flexion, extension, external rotation: d = –0.67 to −1.20), single-leg reactive strength (d = −0.73), and HAGOS (r = −0.74 to −0.89) as compared with the CON cohort. Hip strength (d = −0.83 to −1.15) and reactive strength (d = −0.30) improved with rehabilitation and were no longer significantly different between groups at RTP. HAGOS improvements were maintained or improved in athletes with AGP up to 6 months after RTP, although some subscales remained significantly lower than the CON group (r = −0.35 to −0.51). Two linear regression features (hip abduction and external rotation) explained 11% of the variance in the HAGOS Sports and Recreation subscale. CONCLUSION: Athletes with AGP demonstrated isometric hip strength and reactive strength deficits that resolved after an intersegmental control rehabilitation program; however, improved hip strength explained only 11% of improvement in the Sports and Recreation subscale. HAGOS improvements after pain-free RTP were maintained at 6 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8411474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84114742021-09-03 Hip Muscle Strength Explains Only 11% of the Improvement in HAGOS With an Intersegmental Approach to Successful Rehabilitation of Athletic Groin Pain Baida, Samuel R. King, Enda Richter, Chris Gore, Shane Franklyn-Miller, Andrew Moran, Kieran Am J Sports Med Articles BACKGROUND: Exercise-based rehabilitation targeting intersegmental control has high success rates and fast recovery times in the management of athletic groin pain (AGP). The influence of this approach on hip strength and lower limb reactive strength and how these measures compare with uninjured athletes (CON) remain unknown. Additionally, the efficacy of this program after return to play (RTP) has not been examined. PURPOSE: First, to examine differences in isometric hip strength, reactive strength, and the Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) between the AGP and CON cohorts and after rehabilitation; second, to examine the relationship between the change in HAGOS and the change in strength variables after rehabilitation; last, to track HAGOS for 6 months after RTP. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 42 athletes diagnosed with AGP and 36 matched controls completed baseline testing: isometric hip strength, lower limb reactive strength, and HAGOS. After rehabilitation, athletes with AGP were retested, and HAGOS was collected at 3 and 6 months after RTP. RESULTS: In total, 36 athletes with AGP completed the program with an RTP time of 9.8 ± 3.0 weeks (mean ± SD). At baseline, these athletes had significantly lower isometric hip strength (abduction, adduction, flexion, extension, external rotation: d = –0.67 to −1.20), single-leg reactive strength (d = −0.73), and HAGOS (r = −0.74 to −0.89) as compared with the CON cohort. Hip strength (d = −0.83 to −1.15) and reactive strength (d = −0.30) improved with rehabilitation and were no longer significantly different between groups at RTP. HAGOS improvements were maintained or improved in athletes with AGP up to 6 months after RTP, although some subscales remained significantly lower than the CON group (r = −0.35 to −0.51). Two linear regression features (hip abduction and external rotation) explained 11% of the variance in the HAGOS Sports and Recreation subscale. CONCLUSION: Athletes with AGP demonstrated isometric hip strength and reactive strength deficits that resolved after an intersegmental control rehabilitation program; however, improved hip strength explained only 11% of improvement in the Sports and Recreation subscale. HAGOS improvements after pain-free RTP were maintained at 6 months. SAGE Publications 2021-08-16 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8411474/ /pubmed/34398640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465211028981 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Baida, Samuel R.
King, Enda
Richter, Chris
Gore, Shane
Franklyn-Miller, Andrew
Moran, Kieran
Hip Muscle Strength Explains Only 11% of the Improvement in HAGOS With an Intersegmental Approach to Successful Rehabilitation of Athletic Groin Pain
title Hip Muscle Strength Explains Only 11% of the Improvement in HAGOS With an Intersegmental Approach to Successful Rehabilitation of Athletic Groin Pain
title_full Hip Muscle Strength Explains Only 11% of the Improvement in HAGOS With an Intersegmental Approach to Successful Rehabilitation of Athletic Groin Pain
title_fullStr Hip Muscle Strength Explains Only 11% of the Improvement in HAGOS With an Intersegmental Approach to Successful Rehabilitation of Athletic Groin Pain
title_full_unstemmed Hip Muscle Strength Explains Only 11% of the Improvement in HAGOS With an Intersegmental Approach to Successful Rehabilitation of Athletic Groin Pain
title_short Hip Muscle Strength Explains Only 11% of the Improvement in HAGOS With an Intersegmental Approach to Successful Rehabilitation of Athletic Groin Pain
title_sort hip muscle strength explains only 11% of the improvement in hagos with an intersegmental approach to successful rehabilitation of athletic groin pain
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34398640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465211028981
work_keys_str_mv AT baidasamuelr hipmusclestrengthexplainsonly11oftheimprovementinhagoswithanintersegmentalapproachtosuccessfulrehabilitationofathleticgroinpain
AT kingenda hipmusclestrengthexplainsonly11oftheimprovementinhagoswithanintersegmentalapproachtosuccessfulrehabilitationofathleticgroinpain
AT richterchris hipmusclestrengthexplainsonly11oftheimprovementinhagoswithanintersegmentalapproachtosuccessfulrehabilitationofathleticgroinpain
AT goreshane hipmusclestrengthexplainsonly11oftheimprovementinhagoswithanintersegmentalapproachtosuccessfulrehabilitationofathleticgroinpain
AT franklynmillerandrew hipmusclestrengthexplainsonly11oftheimprovementinhagoswithanintersegmentalapproachtosuccessfulrehabilitationofathleticgroinpain
AT morankieran hipmusclestrengthexplainsonly11oftheimprovementinhagoswithanintersegmentalapproachtosuccessfulrehabilitationofathleticgroinpain