Cargando…
Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical variations of the root canal system of mandibular second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: 190 mandibular second molars cone-beam computed tomography images were reviewed. The evaluation was performed by...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01787-7 |
_version_ | 1783747306288316416 |
---|---|
author | Gomez, Francisco Brea, Gisbeli Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco |
author_facet | Gomez, Francisco Brea, Gisbeli Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco |
author_sort | Gomez, Francisco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical variations of the root canal system of mandibular second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: 190 mandibular second molars cone-beam computed tomography images were reviewed. The evaluation was performed by a radiologist with endodontic experience and two endodontists trained with CBCT technology. Tooth position, number of root and root canals, C-shaped root canal system configuration, presence of extra root (radix), and radicular grooves were assessed. Data was statistically analyzed using The Chi-square test (α = 0,05) to determine any significant difference between gender and the total number of root and root canals, and any significant difference between gender and root canal anatomical variation. RESULTS: Overall, 85.5% showed two separated roots, 12.1% a single root, 2.6% three roots or radix. 87.7% showed three root canals, 12.1% two root canals, 2.6% four root canals, and 1.6% a single root canal. 10% showed a single foramen, 75.3% two foramina, 13.6% three foramina and 1% showed four foramina.19.5% showed C-shaped anatomical variation, 51.4% in male patients, 48.6% in female patients. According to Fan classification: C1 13.6% in cervical third, C2 10% in the middle third, C3 17.3% in middle third, 15.5% in apical third, and C4 12.7% in the apical third. Root canals number in these samples were 5.4% a single canal, 21.6% two canals, 70.3% three canals, and 2.7% four canals. The root showed 46% with one foramen, 46% two foramina, and 8% three foramina. Radicular grooves 83.3% were found in the lingual area and 16.2% towards the buccal area. CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent anatomic presentation of the evaluated sample was a mandibular second molars with two roots, three root canals, and two apical foramina. Their variation was C-shaped root canals and Radix Paramolaris. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8411505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84115052021-09-09 Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis Gomez, Francisco Brea, Gisbeli Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical variations of the root canal system of mandibular second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: 190 mandibular second molars cone-beam computed tomography images were reviewed. The evaluation was performed by a radiologist with endodontic experience and two endodontists trained with CBCT technology. Tooth position, number of root and root canals, C-shaped root canal system configuration, presence of extra root (radix), and radicular grooves were assessed. Data was statistically analyzed using The Chi-square test (α = 0,05) to determine any significant difference between gender and the total number of root and root canals, and any significant difference between gender and root canal anatomical variation. RESULTS: Overall, 85.5% showed two separated roots, 12.1% a single root, 2.6% three roots or radix. 87.7% showed three root canals, 12.1% two root canals, 2.6% four root canals, and 1.6% a single root canal. 10% showed a single foramen, 75.3% two foramina, 13.6% three foramina and 1% showed four foramina.19.5% showed C-shaped anatomical variation, 51.4% in male patients, 48.6% in female patients. According to Fan classification: C1 13.6% in cervical third, C2 10% in the middle third, C3 17.3% in middle third, 15.5% in apical third, and C4 12.7% in the apical third. Root canals number in these samples were 5.4% a single canal, 21.6% two canals, 70.3% three canals, and 2.7% four canals. The root showed 46% with one foramen, 46% two foramina, and 8% three foramina. Radicular grooves 83.3% were found in the lingual area and 16.2% towards the buccal area. CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent anatomic presentation of the evaluated sample was a mandibular second molars with two roots, three root canals, and two apical foramina. Their variation was C-shaped root canals and Radix Paramolaris. BioMed Central 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8411505/ /pubmed/34470619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01787-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gomez, Francisco Brea, Gisbeli Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis |
title | Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis |
title_full | Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis |
title_fullStr | Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis |
title_short | Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis |
title_sort | root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01787-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomezfrancisco rootcanalmorphologyandvariationsinmandibularsecondmolarsaninvivoconebeamcomputedtomographyanalysis AT breagisbeli rootcanalmorphologyandvariationsinmandibularsecondmolarsaninvivoconebeamcomputedtomographyanalysis AT gomezsosajosefrancisco rootcanalmorphologyandvariationsinmandibularsecondmolarsaninvivoconebeamcomputedtomographyanalysis |