Cargando…

Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical variations of the root canal system of mandibular second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: 190 mandibular second molars cone-beam computed tomography images were reviewed. The evaluation was performed by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomez, Francisco, Brea, Gisbeli, Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01787-7
_version_ 1783747306288316416
author Gomez, Francisco
Brea, Gisbeli
Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco
author_facet Gomez, Francisco
Brea, Gisbeli
Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco
author_sort Gomez, Francisco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical variations of the root canal system of mandibular second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: 190 mandibular second molars cone-beam computed tomography images were reviewed. The evaluation was performed by a radiologist with endodontic experience and two endodontists trained with CBCT technology. Tooth position, number of root and root canals, C-shaped root canal system configuration, presence of extra root (radix), and radicular grooves were assessed. Data was statistically analyzed using The Chi-square test (α = 0,05) to determine any significant difference between gender and the total number of root and root canals, and any significant difference between gender and root canal anatomical variation. RESULTS: Overall, 85.5% showed two separated roots, 12.1% a single root, 2.6% three roots or radix. 87.7% showed three root canals, 12.1% two root canals, 2.6% four root canals, and 1.6% a single root canal. 10% showed a single foramen, 75.3% two foramina, 13.6% three foramina and 1% showed four foramina.19.5% showed C-shaped anatomical variation, 51.4% in male patients, 48.6% in female patients. According to Fan classification: C1 13.6% in cervical third, C2 10% in the middle third, C3 17.3% in middle third, 15.5% in apical third, and C4 12.7% in the apical third. Root canals number in these samples were 5.4% a single canal, 21.6% two canals, 70.3% three canals, and 2.7% four canals. The root showed 46% with one foramen, 46% two foramina, and 8% three foramina. Radicular grooves 83.3% were found in the lingual area and 16.2% towards the buccal area. CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent anatomic presentation of the evaluated sample was a mandibular second molars with two roots, three root canals, and two apical foramina. Their variation was C-shaped root canals and Radix Paramolaris.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8411505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84115052021-09-09 Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis Gomez, Francisco Brea, Gisbeli Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical variations of the root canal system of mandibular second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: 190 mandibular second molars cone-beam computed tomography images were reviewed. The evaluation was performed by a radiologist with endodontic experience and two endodontists trained with CBCT technology. Tooth position, number of root and root canals, C-shaped root canal system configuration, presence of extra root (radix), and radicular grooves were assessed. Data was statistically analyzed using The Chi-square test (α = 0,05) to determine any significant difference between gender and the total number of root and root canals, and any significant difference between gender and root canal anatomical variation. RESULTS: Overall, 85.5% showed two separated roots, 12.1% a single root, 2.6% three roots or radix. 87.7% showed three root canals, 12.1% two root canals, 2.6% four root canals, and 1.6% a single root canal. 10% showed a single foramen, 75.3% two foramina, 13.6% three foramina and 1% showed four foramina.19.5% showed C-shaped anatomical variation, 51.4% in male patients, 48.6% in female patients. According to Fan classification: C1 13.6% in cervical third, C2 10% in the middle third, C3 17.3% in middle third, 15.5% in apical third, and C4 12.7% in the apical third. Root canals number in these samples were 5.4% a single canal, 21.6% two canals, 70.3% three canals, and 2.7% four canals. The root showed 46% with one foramen, 46% two foramina, and 8% three foramina. Radicular grooves 83.3% were found in the lingual area and 16.2% towards the buccal area. CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent anatomic presentation of the evaluated sample was a mandibular second molars with two roots, three root canals, and two apical foramina. Their variation was C-shaped root canals and Radix Paramolaris. BioMed Central 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8411505/ /pubmed/34470619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01787-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gomez, Francisco
Brea, Gisbeli
Gomez-Sosa, Jose Francisco
Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis
title Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis
title_full Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis
title_fullStr Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis
title_full_unstemmed Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis
title_short Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis
title_sort root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01787-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezfrancisco rootcanalmorphologyandvariationsinmandibularsecondmolarsaninvivoconebeamcomputedtomographyanalysis
AT breagisbeli rootcanalmorphologyandvariationsinmandibularsecondmolarsaninvivoconebeamcomputedtomographyanalysis
AT gomezsosajosefrancisco rootcanalmorphologyandvariationsinmandibularsecondmolarsaninvivoconebeamcomputedtomographyanalysis