Cargando…

Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

Speech intelligibility in multitalker settings is challenging for most cochlear implant (CI) users. One possibility for this limitation is the suboptimal representation of vocal cues in implant processing, such as the fundamental frequency (F0), and the vocal tract length (VTL). Previous studies sug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nogueira, Waldo, Boghdady, Nawal El, Langner, Florian, Gaudrain, Etienne, Başkent, Deniz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34461780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211030166
_version_ 1783747331770810368
author Nogueira, Waldo
Boghdady, Nawal El
Langner, Florian
Gaudrain, Etienne
Başkent, Deniz
author_facet Nogueira, Waldo
Boghdady, Nawal El
Langner, Florian
Gaudrain, Etienne
Başkent, Deniz
author_sort Nogueira, Waldo
collection PubMed
description Speech intelligibility in multitalker settings is challenging for most cochlear implant (CI) users. One possibility for this limitation is the suboptimal representation of vocal cues in implant processing, such as the fundamental frequency (F0), and the vocal tract length (VTL). Previous studies suggested that while F0 perception depends on spectrotemporal cues, VTL perception relies largely on spectral cues. To investigate how spectral smearing in CIs affects vocal cue perception in speech-on-speech (SoS) settings, adjacent electrodes were simultaneously stimulated using current steering in 12 Advanced Bionics users to simulate channel interaction. In current steering, two adjacent electrodes are simultaneously stimulated forming a channel of parallel stimulation. Three such stimulation patterns were used: Sequential (one current steering channel), Paired (two channels), and Triplet stimulation (three channels). F0 and VTL just-noticeable differences (JNDs; Task 1), in addition to SoS intelligibility (Task 2) and comprehension (Task 3), were measured for each stimulation strategy. In Tasks 2 and 3, four maskers were used: the same female talker, a male voice obtained by manipulating both F0 and VTL (F0+VTL) of the original female speaker, a voice where only F0 was manipulated, and a voice where only VTL was manipulated. JNDs were measured relative to the original voice for the F0, VTL, and F0+VTL manipulations. When spectral smearing was increased from Sequential to Triplet, a significant deterioration in performance was observed for Tasks 1 and 2, with no differences between Sequential and Paired stimulation. Data from Task 3 were inconclusive. These results imply that CI users may tolerate certain amounts of channel interaction without significant reduction in performance on tasks relying on voice perception. This points to possibilities for using parallel stimulation in CIs for reducing power consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8411629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84116292021-09-03 Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users Nogueira, Waldo Boghdady, Nawal El Langner, Florian Gaudrain, Etienne Başkent, Deniz Trends Hear Original Article Speech intelligibility in multitalker settings is challenging for most cochlear implant (CI) users. One possibility for this limitation is the suboptimal representation of vocal cues in implant processing, such as the fundamental frequency (F0), and the vocal tract length (VTL). Previous studies suggested that while F0 perception depends on spectrotemporal cues, VTL perception relies largely on spectral cues. To investigate how spectral smearing in CIs affects vocal cue perception in speech-on-speech (SoS) settings, adjacent electrodes were simultaneously stimulated using current steering in 12 Advanced Bionics users to simulate channel interaction. In current steering, two adjacent electrodes are simultaneously stimulated forming a channel of parallel stimulation. Three such stimulation patterns were used: Sequential (one current steering channel), Paired (two channels), and Triplet stimulation (three channels). F0 and VTL just-noticeable differences (JNDs; Task 1), in addition to SoS intelligibility (Task 2) and comprehension (Task 3), were measured for each stimulation strategy. In Tasks 2 and 3, four maskers were used: the same female talker, a male voice obtained by manipulating both F0 and VTL (F0+VTL) of the original female speaker, a voice where only F0 was manipulated, and a voice where only VTL was manipulated. JNDs were measured relative to the original voice for the F0, VTL, and F0+VTL manipulations. When spectral smearing was increased from Sequential to Triplet, a significant deterioration in performance was observed for Tasks 1 and 2, with no differences between Sequential and Paired stimulation. Data from Task 3 were inconclusive. These results imply that CI users may tolerate certain amounts of channel interaction without significant reduction in performance on tasks relying on voice perception. This points to possibilities for using parallel stimulation in CIs for reducing power consumption. SAGE Publications 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8411629/ /pubmed/34461780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211030166 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nogueira, Waldo
Boghdady, Nawal El
Langner, Florian
Gaudrain, Etienne
Başkent, Deniz
Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users
title Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users
title_full Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users
title_short Effect of Channel Interaction on Vocal Cue Perception in Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort effect of channel interaction on vocal cue perception in cochlear implant users
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34461780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211030166
work_keys_str_mv AT nogueirawaldo effectofchannelinteractiononvocalcueperceptionincochlearimplantusers
AT boghdadynawalel effectofchannelinteractiononvocalcueperceptionincochlearimplantusers
AT langnerflorian effectofchannelinteractiononvocalcueperceptionincochlearimplantusers
AT gaudrainetienne effectofchannelinteractiononvocalcueperceptionincochlearimplantusers
AT baskentdeniz effectofchannelinteractiononvocalcueperceptionincochlearimplantusers