Cargando…
Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
BACKGROUND: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. METHODS: This has been a retrospective, observational, single‐c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34097780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12864 |
_version_ | 1783747346600820736 |
---|---|
author | Radovanović, Nikola N. Pavlović, Siniša U. Kirćanski, Bratislav Branković, Nemanja Vujadinović, Nikola Sajić, Vojislav Milašinović, Ana Bisenić, Vesna Živković, Mirjana Milašinović, Goran |
author_facet | Radovanović, Nikola N. Pavlović, Siniša U. Kirćanski, Bratislav Branković, Nemanja Vujadinović, Nikola Sajić, Vojislav Milašinović, Ana Bisenić, Vesna Živković, Mirjana Milašinović, Goran |
author_sort | Radovanović, Nikola N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. METHODS: This has been a retrospective, observational, single‐center study. We included 181 patients in whom ILR was implanted at the Clinical Center of Serbia between January 2006 and July 2019. An event was marked as diagnostic if it led to a diagnosis and ILR was considered diagnostic if it verified or excluded an arrhythmia as the cause of syncope or palpitations. RESULTS: The mean age was 51.8 ± 17.8 years and 94 (51.9%) were male. The mean follow‐up period was 20.2 ± 15.8 months. ILR was diagnostic in 98 patients (54.1%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic value of ILR in regard to the baseline patients’ characteristics. The mean time to occurrence of the diagnostic event was 11.1 ± 9.6 months. The time to occurrence of a diagnostic event did not differ significantly between patients who underwent basic as compared to extended diagnostics before ILR implantation. CONCLUSIONS: ILR was able to achieve an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients with recurrent palpitations, ILR was significantly less diagnostic than in patients with syncope or presyncope. ILR should be implanted beforehand in syncope evaluation process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8411757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84117572021-09-03 Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations Radovanović, Nikola N. Pavlović, Siniša U. Kirćanski, Bratislav Branković, Nemanja Vujadinović, Nikola Sajić, Vojislav Milašinović, Ana Bisenić, Vesna Živković, Mirjana Milašinović, Goran Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm‐monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. METHODS: This has been a retrospective, observational, single‐center study. We included 181 patients in whom ILR was implanted at the Clinical Center of Serbia between January 2006 and July 2019. An event was marked as diagnostic if it led to a diagnosis and ILR was considered diagnostic if it verified or excluded an arrhythmia as the cause of syncope or palpitations. RESULTS: The mean age was 51.8 ± 17.8 years and 94 (51.9%) were male. The mean follow‐up period was 20.2 ± 15.8 months. ILR was diagnostic in 98 patients (54.1%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic value of ILR in regard to the baseline patients’ characteristics. The mean time to occurrence of the diagnostic event was 11.1 ± 9.6 months. The time to occurrence of a diagnostic event did not differ significantly between patients who underwent basic as compared to extended diagnostics before ILR implantation. CONCLUSIONS: ILR was able to achieve an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients with recurrent palpitations, ILR was significantly less diagnostic than in patients with syncope or presyncope. ILR should be implanted beforehand in syncope evaluation process. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8411757/ /pubmed/34097780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12864 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Radovanović, Nikola N. Pavlović, Siniša U. Kirćanski, Bratislav Branković, Nemanja Vujadinović, Nikola Sajić, Vojislav Milašinović, Ana Bisenić, Vesna Živković, Mirjana Milašinović, Goran Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title | Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_full | Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_short | Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
title_sort | diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34097780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radovanovicnikolan diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT pavlovicsinisau diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT kircanskibratislav diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT brankovicnemanja diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT vujadinovicnikola diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT sajicvojislav diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT milasinovicana diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT bisenicvesna diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT zivkovicmirjana diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations AT milasinovicgoran diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecordersinpatientswithunexplainedsyncopeorpalpitations |