Cargando…

Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation

Emotion regulation is an indispensable part of mental health and adaptive behavior. Research into emotion regulation processes has largely focused on the concurrent effects of volitional emotion regulation. However, there is scarce evidence considering post-regulatory effects with regard to neural m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diers, Kersten, Dörfel, Denise, Gärtner, Anne, Schönfeld, Sabine, Walter, Henrik, Strobel, Alexander, Brocke, Burkhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255800
_version_ 1783747440619290624
author Diers, Kersten
Dörfel, Denise
Gärtner, Anne
Schönfeld, Sabine
Walter, Henrik
Strobel, Alexander
Brocke, Burkhard
author_facet Diers, Kersten
Dörfel, Denise
Gärtner, Anne
Schönfeld, Sabine
Walter, Henrik
Strobel, Alexander
Brocke, Burkhard
author_sort Diers, Kersten
collection PubMed
description Emotion regulation is an indispensable part of mental health and adaptive behavior. Research into emotion regulation processes has largely focused on the concurrent effects of volitional emotion regulation. However, there is scarce evidence considering post-regulatory effects with regard to neural mechanisms and emotional experiences. Therefore, we compared concurrent effects of cognitive emotion regulation with effects at different (immediate, short- and long-term) time intervals. In an fMRI study with N = 46 (N = 30 at re-exposure) young healthy adults, we compared neuronal responses to negative and neutral pictures while participants had to distance themselves from or to actively permit emotions in response to these pictures. We investigated the temporal dynamics of activation changes related to regulation in cognitive control brain networks as well as in the amygdala during stimulation (concurrent effects, timepoint 1) and post-stimulation (immediate, timepoint 2), as well as during re-exposure with the same pictures after short (10 minutes, timepoint 3) and long (1 week, timepoint 4) time intervals. At timepoint 1, negative pictures (versus neutral pictures) elicited a strong response in regions of affective processing, including the amygdala. Distancing (as compared to permit) led to a decrease of this response, and to an increase of activation in the right middle frontal and inferior parietal cortex. We observed an interaction effect of time (stimulation vs. post-stimulation) and regulation (distance vs. permit), indicating a partial reversal of regulation effects during the post-stimulation phase (timepoint 2). Similarly, after 10 minutes (timepoint 3) and after 1 week (timepoint 4), activation in the amygdala was higher during pictures that participants were previously instructed to distance from as compared to permit. These results show that the temporal dynamics are highly variable both within experimental trials and across brain regions. This can even take the form of paradoxical aftereffects at immediate and persistent effects at prolonged time scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8412372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84123722021-09-03 Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation Diers, Kersten Dörfel, Denise Gärtner, Anne Schönfeld, Sabine Walter, Henrik Strobel, Alexander Brocke, Burkhard PLoS One Research Article Emotion regulation is an indispensable part of mental health and adaptive behavior. Research into emotion regulation processes has largely focused on the concurrent effects of volitional emotion regulation. However, there is scarce evidence considering post-regulatory effects with regard to neural mechanisms and emotional experiences. Therefore, we compared concurrent effects of cognitive emotion regulation with effects at different (immediate, short- and long-term) time intervals. In an fMRI study with N = 46 (N = 30 at re-exposure) young healthy adults, we compared neuronal responses to negative and neutral pictures while participants had to distance themselves from or to actively permit emotions in response to these pictures. We investigated the temporal dynamics of activation changes related to regulation in cognitive control brain networks as well as in the amygdala during stimulation (concurrent effects, timepoint 1) and post-stimulation (immediate, timepoint 2), as well as during re-exposure with the same pictures after short (10 minutes, timepoint 3) and long (1 week, timepoint 4) time intervals. At timepoint 1, negative pictures (versus neutral pictures) elicited a strong response in regions of affective processing, including the amygdala. Distancing (as compared to permit) led to a decrease of this response, and to an increase of activation in the right middle frontal and inferior parietal cortex. We observed an interaction effect of time (stimulation vs. post-stimulation) and regulation (distance vs. permit), indicating a partial reversal of regulation effects during the post-stimulation phase (timepoint 2). Similarly, after 10 minutes (timepoint 3) and after 1 week (timepoint 4), activation in the amygdala was higher during pictures that participants were previously instructed to distance from as compared to permit. These results show that the temporal dynamics are highly variable both within experimental trials and across brain regions. This can even take the form of paradoxical aftereffects at immediate and persistent effects at prolonged time scales. Public Library of Science 2021-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8412372/ /pubmed/34473749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255800 Text en © 2021 Diers et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Diers, Kersten
Dörfel, Denise
Gärtner, Anne
Schönfeld, Sabine
Walter, Henrik
Strobel, Alexander
Brocke, Burkhard
Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation
title Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation
title_full Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation
title_fullStr Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation
title_full_unstemmed Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation
title_short Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation
title_sort should we keep some distance from distancing? regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255800
work_keys_str_mv AT dierskersten shouldwekeepsomedistancefromdistancingregulatoryandpostregulatoryeffectsofemotiondownregulation
AT dorfeldenise shouldwekeepsomedistancefromdistancingregulatoryandpostregulatoryeffectsofemotiondownregulation
AT gartneranne shouldwekeepsomedistancefromdistancingregulatoryandpostregulatoryeffectsofemotiondownregulation
AT schonfeldsabine shouldwekeepsomedistancefromdistancingregulatoryandpostregulatoryeffectsofemotiondownregulation
AT walterhenrik shouldwekeepsomedistancefromdistancingregulatoryandpostregulatoryeffectsofemotiondownregulation
AT strobelalexander shouldwekeepsomedistancefromdistancingregulatoryandpostregulatoryeffectsofemotiondownregulation
AT brockeburkhard shouldwekeepsomedistancefromdistancingregulatoryandpostregulatoryeffectsofemotiondownregulation