Cargando…

Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review

BACKGROUND: Recently, dental implant technology has been widely used for oral reconstruction. Dental implants are the treatment of choice for those patients with dental absences. An optimal implant placement is based on the prosthetic driven concept in order to achieve an aesthetic and functional re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parra-Tresserra, Anna, Marquès-Guasch, Jordi, Ortega-Martínez, Jordi, Basilio-Monné, Joan, Hernández-Alfaro, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34023841
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24566
_version_ 1783747457043136512
author Parra-Tresserra, Anna
Marquès-Guasch, Jordi
Ortega-Martínez, Jordi
Basilio-Monné, Joan
Hernández-Alfaro, Federico
author_facet Parra-Tresserra, Anna
Marquès-Guasch, Jordi
Ortega-Martínez, Jordi
Basilio-Monné, Joan
Hernández-Alfaro, Federico
author_sort Parra-Tresserra, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, dental implant technology has been widely used for oral reconstruction. Dental implants are the treatment of choice for those patients with dental absences. An optimal implant placement is based on the prosthetic driven concept in order to achieve an aesthetic and functional restoration with a long-term prognosis. There are two types of guided implant surgery that are described in the literature: Static Guided Surgery (SGS) and Dynamic Guided Surgery (DGS). The aim of this study is to be aware of the current state of dynamic surgery and compare in the literature the discrepancies between planning and placement of dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study consists of a bibliographic review on the topic. The research has been performed in the Medline/Pubmed of articles published by different professional associations and societies in the international context. RESULTS: Twenty two studies out of 100 articles from the initial search were finally included. Our results have been compared with other current available papers in the literature reviewed that obtained similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic navigation shows a better accuracy and precision of implant placement. To corroborate the results of this review as well as to evaluate the different variables that could influence the accuracy of this technique, future randomized control trials will be needed. Key words:Guided surgery, dynamic navigation, dynamic guided surgery, computer assisted surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8412455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84124552021-09-09 Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review Parra-Tresserra, Anna Marquès-Guasch, Jordi Ortega-Martínez, Jordi Basilio-Monné, Joan Hernández-Alfaro, Federico Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review BACKGROUND: Recently, dental implant technology has been widely used for oral reconstruction. Dental implants are the treatment of choice for those patients with dental absences. An optimal implant placement is based on the prosthetic driven concept in order to achieve an aesthetic and functional restoration with a long-term prognosis. There are two types of guided implant surgery that are described in the literature: Static Guided Surgery (SGS) and Dynamic Guided Surgery (DGS). The aim of this study is to be aware of the current state of dynamic surgery and compare in the literature the discrepancies between planning and placement of dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study consists of a bibliographic review on the topic. The research has been performed in the Medline/Pubmed of articles published by different professional associations and societies in the international context. RESULTS: Twenty two studies out of 100 articles from the initial search were finally included. Our results have been compared with other current available papers in the literature reviewed that obtained similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic navigation shows a better accuracy and precision of implant placement. To corroborate the results of this review as well as to evaluate the different variables that could influence the accuracy of this technique, future randomized control trials will be needed. Key words:Guided surgery, dynamic navigation, dynamic guided surgery, computer assisted surgery. Medicina Oral S.L. 2021-09 2021-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8412455/ /pubmed/34023841 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24566 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Parra-Tresserra, Anna
Marquès-Guasch, Jordi
Ortega-Martínez, Jordi
Basilio-Monné, Joan
Hernández-Alfaro, Federico
Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review
title Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review
title_full Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review
title_fullStr Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review
title_full_unstemmed Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review
title_short Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review
title_sort current state of dynamic surgery. a literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34023841
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24566
work_keys_str_mv AT parratresserraanna currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview
AT marquesguaschjordi currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview
AT ortegamartinezjordi currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview
AT basiliomonnejoan currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview
AT hernandezalfarofederico currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview