Cargando…
Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review
BACKGROUND: Recently, dental implant technology has been widely used for oral reconstruction. Dental implants are the treatment of choice for those patients with dental absences. An optimal implant placement is based on the prosthetic driven concept in order to achieve an aesthetic and functional re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34023841 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24566 |
_version_ | 1783747457043136512 |
---|---|
author | Parra-Tresserra, Anna Marquès-Guasch, Jordi Ortega-Martínez, Jordi Basilio-Monné, Joan Hernández-Alfaro, Federico |
author_facet | Parra-Tresserra, Anna Marquès-Guasch, Jordi Ortega-Martínez, Jordi Basilio-Monné, Joan Hernández-Alfaro, Federico |
author_sort | Parra-Tresserra, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, dental implant technology has been widely used for oral reconstruction. Dental implants are the treatment of choice for those patients with dental absences. An optimal implant placement is based on the prosthetic driven concept in order to achieve an aesthetic and functional restoration with a long-term prognosis. There are two types of guided implant surgery that are described in the literature: Static Guided Surgery (SGS) and Dynamic Guided Surgery (DGS). The aim of this study is to be aware of the current state of dynamic surgery and compare in the literature the discrepancies between planning and placement of dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study consists of a bibliographic review on the topic. The research has been performed in the Medline/Pubmed of articles published by different professional associations and societies in the international context. RESULTS: Twenty two studies out of 100 articles from the initial search were finally included. Our results have been compared with other current available papers in the literature reviewed that obtained similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic navigation shows a better accuracy and precision of implant placement. To corroborate the results of this review as well as to evaluate the different variables that could influence the accuracy of this technique, future randomized control trials will be needed. Key words:Guided surgery, dynamic navigation, dynamic guided surgery, computer assisted surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8412455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84124552021-09-09 Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review Parra-Tresserra, Anna Marquès-Guasch, Jordi Ortega-Martínez, Jordi Basilio-Monné, Joan Hernández-Alfaro, Federico Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review BACKGROUND: Recently, dental implant technology has been widely used for oral reconstruction. Dental implants are the treatment of choice for those patients with dental absences. An optimal implant placement is based on the prosthetic driven concept in order to achieve an aesthetic and functional restoration with a long-term prognosis. There are two types of guided implant surgery that are described in the literature: Static Guided Surgery (SGS) and Dynamic Guided Surgery (DGS). The aim of this study is to be aware of the current state of dynamic surgery and compare in the literature the discrepancies between planning and placement of dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study consists of a bibliographic review on the topic. The research has been performed in the Medline/Pubmed of articles published by different professional associations and societies in the international context. RESULTS: Twenty two studies out of 100 articles from the initial search were finally included. Our results have been compared with other current available papers in the literature reviewed that obtained similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic navigation shows a better accuracy and precision of implant placement. To corroborate the results of this review as well as to evaluate the different variables that could influence the accuracy of this technique, future randomized control trials will be needed. Key words:Guided surgery, dynamic navigation, dynamic guided surgery, computer assisted surgery. Medicina Oral S.L. 2021-09 2021-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8412455/ /pubmed/34023841 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24566 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Parra-Tresserra, Anna Marquès-Guasch, Jordi Ortega-Martínez, Jordi Basilio-Monné, Joan Hernández-Alfaro, Federico Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review |
title | Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review |
title_full | Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review |
title_fullStr | Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review |
title_short | Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review |
title_sort | current state of dynamic surgery. a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34023841 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24566 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parratresserraanna currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview AT marquesguaschjordi currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview AT ortegamartinezjordi currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview AT basiliomonnejoan currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview AT hernandezalfarofederico currentstateofdynamicsurgeryaliteraturereview |