Cargando…
Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience
Introduction Over the years, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become an established and effective treatment for chronic urinary system retention and incontinence. The process of SNM is performed in two stages, the first is an evaluation phase and the second an implant phase. This study aimed to asse...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513485 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16912 |
_version_ | 1783747546095550464 |
---|---|
author | Alghafees, Mohammad A Alageel, Mohammed K Alqahtani, Meshari A Alghazwani, Yahia |
author_facet | Alghafees, Mohammad A Alageel, Mohammed K Alqahtani, Meshari A Alghazwani, Yahia |
author_sort | Alghafees, Mohammad A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Over the years, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become an established and effective treatment for chronic urinary system retention and incontinence. The process of SNM is performed in two stages, the first is an evaluation phase and the second an implant phase. This study aimed to assess the rate of failure of progression from the evaluation to the implantation stage and the factors predicting the outcome of this commonplace procedure. Materials and methods This retrospective cross-sectional study took place at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All the patients who underwent SNM implantation from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2021 were included. Patients younger than 14 years and patients who had the SNM implantation in a different hospital and were only followed-up at KAMC were excluded. Patient-related information were extracted from the BESTCare system. Frequency and percentage were used for the categorical variables, and the mean, median, and standard deviation to display the continuous variables. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to test for the association of the categorical variables. Results Among 28 patients, 46.4% (n=13) failed to progress from the evaluation phase to the implantation phase. Gender, age, having a co-morbidity, and SNM indication were not significant factors for predicting the outcome of the SNM evaluation phase. Conclusion The observed failure rate was marginally higher than the ones detected in other studies. Although no significant association was detected between evaluation stage failure and the assigned predictors, the results need to be interpreted with caution due to the small population size. Larger multicenter studies need to be done in order to investigate the link between patient characteristics and the efficacy of SNM. Establishing a concrete evidence would further refine the targeted patient population and indications for SNM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8412884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84128842021-09-09 Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience Alghafees, Mohammad A Alageel, Mohammed K Alqahtani, Meshari A Alghazwani, Yahia Cureus Urology Introduction Over the years, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become an established and effective treatment for chronic urinary system retention and incontinence. The process of SNM is performed in two stages, the first is an evaluation phase and the second an implant phase. This study aimed to assess the rate of failure of progression from the evaluation to the implantation stage and the factors predicting the outcome of this commonplace procedure. Materials and methods This retrospective cross-sectional study took place at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All the patients who underwent SNM implantation from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2021 were included. Patients younger than 14 years and patients who had the SNM implantation in a different hospital and were only followed-up at KAMC were excluded. Patient-related information were extracted from the BESTCare system. Frequency and percentage were used for the categorical variables, and the mean, median, and standard deviation to display the continuous variables. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to test for the association of the categorical variables. Results Among 28 patients, 46.4% (n=13) failed to progress from the evaluation phase to the implantation phase. Gender, age, having a co-morbidity, and SNM indication were not significant factors for predicting the outcome of the SNM evaluation phase. Conclusion The observed failure rate was marginally higher than the ones detected in other studies. Although no significant association was detected between evaluation stage failure and the assigned predictors, the results need to be interpreted with caution due to the small population size. Larger multicenter studies need to be done in order to investigate the link between patient characteristics and the efficacy of SNM. Establishing a concrete evidence would further refine the targeted patient population and indications for SNM. Cureus 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8412884/ /pubmed/34513485 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16912 Text en Copyright © 2021, Alghafees et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Urology Alghafees, Mohammad A Alageel, Mohammed K Alqahtani, Meshari A Alghazwani, Yahia Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience |
title | Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full | Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience |
title_fullStr | Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience |
title_short | Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience |
title_sort | unsuccessful progression of sacral neuromodulation from the evaluation to the implantation stage: a single-center experience |
topic | Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513485 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16912 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alghafeesmohammada unsuccessfulprogressionofsacralneuromodulationfromtheevaluationtotheimplantationstageasinglecenterexperience AT alageelmohammedk unsuccessfulprogressionofsacralneuromodulationfromtheevaluationtotheimplantationstageasinglecenterexperience AT alqahtanimesharia unsuccessfulprogressionofsacralneuromodulationfromtheevaluationtotheimplantationstageasinglecenterexperience AT alghazwaniyahia unsuccessfulprogressionofsacralneuromodulationfromtheevaluationtotheimplantationstageasinglecenterexperience |