Cargando…

Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction Over the years, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become an established and effective treatment for chronic urinary system retention and incontinence. The process of SNM is performed in two stages, the first is an evaluation phase and the second an implant phase. This study aimed to asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alghafees, Mohammad A, Alageel, Mohammed K, Alqahtani, Meshari A, Alghazwani, Yahia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513485
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16912
_version_ 1783747546095550464
author Alghafees, Mohammad A
Alageel, Mohammed K
Alqahtani, Meshari A
Alghazwani, Yahia
author_facet Alghafees, Mohammad A
Alageel, Mohammed K
Alqahtani, Meshari A
Alghazwani, Yahia
author_sort Alghafees, Mohammad A
collection PubMed
description Introduction Over the years, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become an established and effective treatment for chronic urinary system retention and incontinence. The process of SNM is performed in two stages, the first is an evaluation phase and the second an implant phase. This study aimed to assess the rate of failure of progression from the evaluation to the implantation stage and the factors predicting the outcome of this commonplace procedure. Materials and methods This retrospective cross-sectional study took place at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All the patients who underwent SNM implantation from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2021 were included. Patients younger than 14 years and patients who had the SNM implantation in a different hospital and were only followed-up at KAMC were excluded. Patient-related information were extracted from the BESTCare system. Frequency and percentage were used for the categorical variables, and the mean, median, and standard deviation to display the continuous variables. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to test for the association of the categorical variables. Results Among 28 patients, 46.4% (n=13) failed to progress from the evaluation phase to the implantation phase. Gender, age, having a co-morbidity, and SNM indication were not significant factors for predicting the outcome of the SNM evaluation phase. Conclusion The observed failure rate was marginally higher than the ones detected in other studies. Although no significant association was detected between evaluation stage failure and the assigned predictors, the results need to be interpreted with caution due to the small population size. Larger multicenter studies need to be done in order to investigate the link between patient characteristics and the efficacy of SNM. Establishing a concrete evidence would further refine the targeted patient population and indications for SNM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8412884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84128842021-09-09 Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience Alghafees, Mohammad A Alageel, Mohammed K Alqahtani, Meshari A Alghazwani, Yahia Cureus Urology Introduction Over the years, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become an established and effective treatment for chronic urinary system retention and incontinence. The process of SNM is performed in two stages, the first is an evaluation phase and the second an implant phase. This study aimed to assess the rate of failure of progression from the evaluation to the implantation stage and the factors predicting the outcome of this commonplace procedure. Materials and methods This retrospective cross-sectional study took place at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All the patients who underwent SNM implantation from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2021 were included. Patients younger than 14 years and patients who had the SNM implantation in a different hospital and were only followed-up at KAMC were excluded. Patient-related information were extracted from the BESTCare system. Frequency and percentage were used for the categorical variables, and the mean, median, and standard deviation to display the continuous variables. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to test for the association of the categorical variables. Results Among 28 patients, 46.4% (n=13) failed to progress from the evaluation phase to the implantation phase. Gender, age, having a co-morbidity, and SNM indication were not significant factors for predicting the outcome of the SNM evaluation phase. Conclusion The observed failure rate was marginally higher than the ones detected in other studies. Although no significant association was detected between evaluation stage failure and the assigned predictors, the results need to be interpreted with caution due to the small population size. Larger multicenter studies need to be done in order to investigate the link between patient characteristics and the efficacy of SNM. Establishing a concrete evidence would further refine the targeted patient population and indications for SNM. Cureus 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8412884/ /pubmed/34513485 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16912 Text en Copyright © 2021, Alghafees et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Urology
Alghafees, Mohammad A
Alageel, Mohammed K
Alqahtani, Meshari A
Alghazwani, Yahia
Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience
title Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Unsuccessful Progression of Sacral Neuromodulation From the Evaluation to the Implantation Stage: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort unsuccessful progression of sacral neuromodulation from the evaluation to the implantation stage: a single-center experience
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513485
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16912
work_keys_str_mv AT alghafeesmohammada unsuccessfulprogressionofsacralneuromodulationfromtheevaluationtotheimplantationstageasinglecenterexperience
AT alageelmohammedk unsuccessfulprogressionofsacralneuromodulationfromtheevaluationtotheimplantationstageasinglecenterexperience
AT alqahtanimesharia unsuccessfulprogressionofsacralneuromodulationfromtheevaluationtotheimplantationstageasinglecenterexperience
AT alghazwaniyahia unsuccessfulprogressionofsacralneuromodulationfromtheevaluationtotheimplantationstageasinglecenterexperience