Cargando…

Clinical value of baseline (18)F-FDG PET/CT in soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND: The use of (18)F-FDG Positron emission tomography/Computed tomography (PET/CT) in the initial staging of many cancers is clearly established. Most soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has a high affinity for (18)F-FDG, which is why (18)F-FDG PET/CT has been proposed as a non-invasive method, useful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reyes Marlés, Rafael Hernando, Navarro Fernández, José Luis, Puertas García-Sandoval, José Pablo, Santonja Medina, Fernando, Mohamed Salem, Laroussi, Frutos Esteban, Laura, Contreras Gutiérrez, José Fulgencio, Castellón Sánchez, María Isabel, Ruiz Merino, Guadalupe, Claver Valderas, María Antonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34476632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00110-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The use of (18)F-FDG Positron emission tomography/Computed tomography (PET/CT) in the initial staging of many cancers is clearly established. Most soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has a high affinity for (18)F-FDG, which is why (18)F-FDG PET/CT has been proposed as a non-invasive method, useful in diagnosis and follow-up. The standardized uptake value values (SUV), the volume-based metabolic parameters MTV (metabolic tumor volume), and TLG (total lesion glycolysis) determine tumor viability and provide its total volume and the total activity of metabolically active tumor cells. The histological grade is the most important predictor of metastases and mortality associated with STS, and a significant relationship between the metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the histological grade has been described. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on STS patients, who had histological grade according to the FNCLCC (Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer) criteria, as well as a baseline PET/CT. SUV (SUV(max), SUV(mean), and SUV(peak)), MTV, and TLG were quantified. A T-student test was performed to establish the relationship between the metabolic biomarkers and the histological grade. Their usefulness as predictors of the histological grade was verified using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. A survival function study was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. To assess the prognostic utility of the metabolic biomarkers we use the Log-Rank method. RESULTS: The SUV values were useful to discriminate high-grade STS. We found a significant relationship between the histological grade and the SUV values. SUV(max), SUV(peak), MTV, and TLG were predictors of overall survival (OS). There were no significant differences in the OS for the SUV(mean), or in the disease-free survival (DFS) for SUV(max), SUV(mean), SUV(peak), MTV, and TLG. CONCLUSIONS: The SUV(max), SUV(mean), and SUV(peak) values correlate with the HG and are useful to discriminate high-grade from low-grade STS. Patients with high SUV(max), SUV(peak), MTV, and TLG have a significantly lower OS.