Cargando…

Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review

During the COVID-19 pandemic older subjects have been disproportionately affected by the disease. Vaccination is a fundamental intervention to prevent the negative consequences of COVID-19, but it is not known if the needs and vulnerabilities of older people are adequately addressed by their inclusi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veronese, Nicola, Petrovic, Mirko, Benetos, Athanase, Denkinger, Michael, Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn, Knol, Wilma, Marking, Christine, Soulis, George, Maggi, Stefania, Cherubini, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34487916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101455
_version_ 1783747671917330432
author Veronese, Nicola
Petrovic, Mirko
Benetos, Athanase
Denkinger, Michael
Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn
Knol, Wilma
Marking, Christine
Soulis, George
Maggi, Stefania
Cherubini, Antonio
author_facet Veronese, Nicola
Petrovic, Mirko
Benetos, Athanase
Denkinger, Michael
Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn
Knol, Wilma
Marking, Christine
Soulis, George
Maggi, Stefania
Cherubini, Antonio
author_sort Veronese, Nicola
collection PubMed
description During the COVID-19 pandemic older subjects have been disproportionately affected by the disease. Vaccination is a fundamental intervention to prevent the negative consequences of COVID-19, but it is not known if the needs and vulnerabilities of older people are adequately addressed by their inclusion in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of vaccines for COVID-19. Given this background, we aimed to evaluate if current and ongoing phase II-III RCTs evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines included a representative sample of older people. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed until May 01st, 2021. Among 474 abstracts initially retrieved, 20 RCTs (ten already published, ten ongoing) were included. In the ten studies already published, the mean age of participants was 45.2 ± 11.9 years and only 9.83% of the participants were more than 65 years, 1.66% more than 75 years and less than 1% (0.55%) more than 85 years. In the ten ongoing RCTs, many of the studies aimed at including participants older than 18 years, with one study including participants between 18 and 84 years, and two between 21 and 100 years. In conclusion, our systematic review demonstrates that in published and ongoing phase II-III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines only a tiny fraction of the most vulnerable group of older people was included, although they clearly were the first population that had to be vaccinated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8413602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84136022021-09-03 Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review Veronese, Nicola Petrovic, Mirko Benetos, Athanase Denkinger, Michael Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn Knol, Wilma Marking, Christine Soulis, George Maggi, Stefania Cherubini, Antonio Ageing Res Rev Review During the COVID-19 pandemic older subjects have been disproportionately affected by the disease. Vaccination is a fundamental intervention to prevent the negative consequences of COVID-19, but it is not known if the needs and vulnerabilities of older people are adequately addressed by their inclusion in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of vaccines for COVID-19. Given this background, we aimed to evaluate if current and ongoing phase II-III RCTs evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines included a representative sample of older people. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed until May 01st, 2021. Among 474 abstracts initially retrieved, 20 RCTs (ten already published, ten ongoing) were included. In the ten studies already published, the mean age of participants was 45.2 ± 11.9 years and only 9.83% of the participants were more than 65 years, 1.66% more than 75 years and less than 1% (0.55%) more than 85 years. In the ten ongoing RCTs, many of the studies aimed at including participants older than 18 years, with one study including participants between 18 and 84 years, and two between 21 and 100 years. In conclusion, our systematic review demonstrates that in published and ongoing phase II-III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines only a tiny fraction of the most vulnerable group of older people was included, although they clearly were the first population that had to be vaccinated. Elsevier B.V. 2021-11 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8413602/ /pubmed/34487916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101455 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Veronese, Nicola
Petrovic, Mirko
Benetos, Athanase
Denkinger, Michael
Gudmundsson, Adalsteinn
Knol, Wilma
Marking, Christine
Soulis, George
Maggi, Stefania
Cherubini, Antonio
Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review
title Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review
title_full Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review
title_fullStr Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review
title_short Underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review
title_sort underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials on covid-19 vaccines: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34487916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101455
work_keys_str_mv AT veronesenicola underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT petrovicmirko underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT benetosathanase underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT denkingermichael underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT gudmundssonadalsteinn underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT knolwilma underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT markingchristine underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT soulisgeorge underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT maggistefania underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT cherubiniantonio underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview
AT underrepresentationofolderadultsinclinicaltrialsoncovid19vaccinesasystematicreview