Cargando…

Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task

BACKGROUND: As we learn a new nonnative language (L2), we begin to build a new map of concepts onto orthographic representations. Eventually, L2 can conjure as rich a semantic representation as our native language (L1). However, the neural processes for mapping a new orthographic representation to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Chris, Williams, Chad C., Krigolson, Olave E., Fyshe, Alona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2234
_version_ 1783747698779750400
author Foster, Chris
Williams, Chad C.
Krigolson, Olave E.
Fyshe, Alona
author_facet Foster, Chris
Williams, Chad C.
Krigolson, Olave E.
Fyshe, Alona
author_sort Foster, Chris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As we learn a new nonnative language (L2), we begin to build a new map of concepts onto orthographic representations. Eventually, L2 can conjure as rich a semantic representation as our native language (L1). However, the neural processes for mapping a new orthographic representation to a familiar meaning are not well understood or characterized. METHODS: Using electroencephalography and an artificial language that maps symbols to English words, we show that it is possible to use machine learning models to detect a newly formed semantic mapping as it is acquired. RESULTS: Through a trial‐by‐trial analysis, we show that we can detect when a new semantic mapping is formed. Our results show that, like word meaning representations evoked by a L1, the localization of the newly formed neural representations is highly distributed, but the representation may emerge more slowly after the onset of the symbol. Furthermore, our mapping of word meanings to symbols removes the confound of the semantics to the visual characteristics of the stimulus, a confound that has been difficult to disentangle previously. CONCLUSION: We have shown that the L1 semantic representation conjured by a newly acquired L2 word can be detected using decoding techniques, and we give the first characterization of the emergence of that mapping. Our work opens up new possibilities for the study of semantic representations during L2 learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8413773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84137732021-09-07 Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task Foster, Chris Williams, Chad C. Krigolson, Olave E. Fyshe, Alona Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: As we learn a new nonnative language (L2), we begin to build a new map of concepts onto orthographic representations. Eventually, L2 can conjure as rich a semantic representation as our native language (L1). However, the neural processes for mapping a new orthographic representation to a familiar meaning are not well understood or characterized. METHODS: Using electroencephalography and an artificial language that maps symbols to English words, we show that it is possible to use machine learning models to detect a newly formed semantic mapping as it is acquired. RESULTS: Through a trial‐by‐trial analysis, we show that we can detect when a new semantic mapping is formed. Our results show that, like word meaning representations evoked by a L1, the localization of the newly formed neural representations is highly distributed, but the representation may emerge more slowly after the onset of the symbol. Furthermore, our mapping of word meanings to symbols removes the confound of the semantics to the visual characteristics of the stimulus, a confound that has been difficult to disentangle previously. CONCLUSION: We have shown that the L1 semantic representation conjured by a newly acquired L2 word can be detected using decoding techniques, and we give the first characterization of the emergence of that mapping. Our work opens up new possibilities for the study of semantic representations during L2 learning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8413773/ /pubmed/34129727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2234 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Foster, Chris
Williams, Chad C.
Krigolson, Olave E.
Fyshe, Alona
Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task
title Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task
title_full Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task
title_fullStr Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task
title_full_unstemmed Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task
title_short Using EEG to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task
title_sort using eeg to decode semantics during an artificial language learning task
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34129727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2234
work_keys_str_mv AT fosterchris usingeegtodecodesemanticsduringanartificiallanguagelearningtask
AT williamschadc usingeegtodecodesemanticsduringanartificiallanguagelearningtask
AT krigolsonolavee usingeegtodecodesemanticsduringanartificiallanguagelearningtask
AT fyshealona usingeegtodecodesemanticsduringanartificiallanguagelearningtask