Cargando…

Head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: An in vitro phantom study

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of quantitative measurements by contemporary intravascular imaging systems including optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI), frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), and 6 intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) systems. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishi, Takeshi, Imura, Shinji, Kitahara, Hideki, Kobayashi, Yoshio, Yock, Paul G., Fitzgerald, Peter J., Honda, Yasuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100867
_version_ 1783747722332864512
author Nishi, Takeshi
Imura, Shinji
Kitahara, Hideki
Kobayashi, Yoshio
Yock, Paul G.
Fitzgerald, Peter J.
Honda, Yasuhiro
author_facet Nishi, Takeshi
Imura, Shinji
Kitahara, Hideki
Kobayashi, Yoshio
Yock, Paul G.
Fitzgerald, Peter J.
Honda, Yasuhiro
author_sort Nishi, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of quantitative measurements by contemporary intravascular imaging systems including optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI), frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), and 6 intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) systems. METHODS: We imaged five cylindrical phantom models made from an acrylic resin with known lumen diameters (1.51, 2.03, 3.04, 4.04, and 5.04 mm, respectively) using OFDI (FastView and LUNAWAVE, Terumo), FD-OCT (Dragonfly JP and ILUMIEN OPTIS, Abbott Vascular), and 6 mechanically rotating IVUS systems including a system, two 40-MHz, one 45-MHz, two 60-Mhz and one broad-band frequency IVUS systems. The OFDI, FD-OCT, and IVUS images were obtained using automated motorized pullback in a tank filled with 37-degree Celsius saline and, in cases of OFDI and FD-OCT, contrast-saline mixture (1:1 ratio) and contrast under the system setting of the refractive index for the corresponding flush medium. RESULTS: All the imaging systems showed good accuracy and excellent precision of lumen measurement with the relative differences between the measured diameter and actual phantom diameter being ranging from −2.9% to 8.0% and minimum standard deviations of the measured diameters (≤0.02 mm). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that contemporary intravascular imaging systems including OFDI, FD-OCT, and IVUS provided clinically acceptable accuracy and excellent precision of quantitative lumen measurement in phantom models in vitro across a wide range of dimensions. Future research to confirm these findings in vivo are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8413874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84138742021-09-08 Head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: An in vitro phantom study Nishi, Takeshi Imura, Shinji Kitahara, Hideki Kobayashi, Yoshio Yock, Paul G. Fitzgerald, Peter J. Honda, Yasuhiro Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Correspondence INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of quantitative measurements by contemporary intravascular imaging systems including optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI), frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), and 6 intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) systems. METHODS: We imaged five cylindrical phantom models made from an acrylic resin with known lumen diameters (1.51, 2.03, 3.04, 4.04, and 5.04 mm, respectively) using OFDI (FastView and LUNAWAVE, Terumo), FD-OCT (Dragonfly JP and ILUMIEN OPTIS, Abbott Vascular), and 6 mechanically rotating IVUS systems including a system, two 40-MHz, one 45-MHz, two 60-Mhz and one broad-band frequency IVUS systems. The OFDI, FD-OCT, and IVUS images were obtained using automated motorized pullback in a tank filled with 37-degree Celsius saline and, in cases of OFDI and FD-OCT, contrast-saline mixture (1:1 ratio) and contrast under the system setting of the refractive index for the corresponding flush medium. RESULTS: All the imaging systems showed good accuracy and excellent precision of lumen measurement with the relative differences between the measured diameter and actual phantom diameter being ranging from −2.9% to 8.0% and minimum standard deviations of the measured diameters (≤0.02 mm). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that contemporary intravascular imaging systems including OFDI, FD-OCT, and IVUS provided clinically acceptable accuracy and excellent precision of quantitative lumen measurement in phantom models in vitro across a wide range of dimensions. Future research to confirm these findings in vivo are warranted. Elsevier 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8413874/ /pubmed/34504947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100867 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Correspondence
Nishi, Takeshi
Imura, Shinji
Kitahara, Hideki
Kobayashi, Yoshio
Yock, Paul G.
Fitzgerald, Peter J.
Honda, Yasuhiro
Head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: An in vitro phantom study
title Head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: An in vitro phantom study
title_full Head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: An in vitro phantom study
title_fullStr Head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: An in vitro phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: An in vitro phantom study
title_short Head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: An in vitro phantom study
title_sort head-to-head comparison of quantitative measurements between intravascular imaging systems: an in vitro phantom study
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100867
work_keys_str_mv AT nishitakeshi headtoheadcomparisonofquantitativemeasurementsbetweenintravascularimagingsystemsaninvitrophantomstudy
AT imurashinji headtoheadcomparisonofquantitativemeasurementsbetweenintravascularimagingsystemsaninvitrophantomstudy
AT kitaharahideki headtoheadcomparisonofquantitativemeasurementsbetweenintravascularimagingsystemsaninvitrophantomstudy
AT kobayashiyoshio headtoheadcomparisonofquantitativemeasurementsbetweenintravascularimagingsystemsaninvitrophantomstudy
AT yockpaulg headtoheadcomparisonofquantitativemeasurementsbetweenintravascularimagingsystemsaninvitrophantomstudy
AT fitzgeraldpeterj headtoheadcomparisonofquantitativemeasurementsbetweenintravascularimagingsystemsaninvitrophantomstudy
AT hondayasuhiro headtoheadcomparisonofquantitativemeasurementsbetweenintravascularimagingsystemsaninvitrophantomstudy